I've been waiting all year till round 23 for a game to be windy at Blundstone Arena and when it's windy both teams forget how to play with the wind...Thompson 1 mark 1 possie short on the SB promo,lol missed my Syd stk middle 160.5/172.5 by 0.5 ,frikkin buddy junk goal! Also ruined the SB other promo they had at $14 Syd,NM, geel,wc all 1-39 cash back if one leg wrong, Syd were up 39 before the buddy goal lol
I like it as well.
Two options for GC. They don't turn up like last 2 round 23 games (both 100 point losses) or they do turn up and GWS win by 7+ goals anyway. Can't see GWS being lethargic given they need to win and they should have sufficient motivation from playing 2 shockers in a row. 6 of the last 8 GC games have been losses by over 42 points including 4 over 69 points. 1u GWS -41.5.lol.
I'm posting a late season psychological betting model from round 19 to 23, hence the disclaimer "Nothing due to this time of year". Same reason why I didn't include the Bris win over Geel, WC line vs NM or Rich line vs Coll which were all wins.
But let's see how we go this week:
2u O154.5 Port vs Freo
2u O163.5 Syd vs StK
1.5u O160.5 Syd vs StK
1u O170.5 NM vs Melb
1u O170.5 GC vs GWS
2u Rich -13.5
1.5u Coll -13.5 TB
1.5u Port -16.5
Feel free for you and Targett to post you're bets up.
paying 3.50 to win coleman at sportsbet, pretty sure he has more behinds so those are better odds for 6 goalsAnyone think J Cameron can level with ben brown for goals tonight? will his team feed it to him just to help him win the coleman? GWS cant change their ladder position. He Needs 6 to draw level. Thoughts?
some options- Cameron 5g+ @2.45 lads, 6g+ @3.10 sb.
You're crazyAnybody else reckon the AFL is a chance to sabotage the Eagles tonight?
It will make it much easier for them to sabotage Richmond tomorrow to gift Brisbane a top two spot.
0.5U Hawks 40+ @ 36.
0.5U Hawks 40+ into Brisbane SU @ 96.
Call me crazy.
rewarded for more shots I thought, I heard about that being a rule when Pav nearly tied Hawkins in 2012, I could be wrong though.Lol I don't think behinds would come into it, rewarded for inaccuracies