- Banned
- #101
You mean orchestrating the biggest election win this century?because peta credlin is the judge of a good prime minister. definitely wasn’t the closest advisor to failed prime minister tony abbott
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean orchestrating the biggest election win this century?because peta credlin is the judge of a good prime minister. definitely wasn’t the closest advisor to failed prime minister tony abbott
Credlin nailed it. Shorten doesn’t look and sound like a PM.
Although Morrison performed better than the other two debates.Good point made on the guardian feed, almost the entire debate and indeed entire campaign has been focused on Labor's policies.
Then they started drinking their own bath water. The beginning of the end.You mean orchestrating the biggest election win this century?
LNP don’t have any policies. I honestly could not name one policy they have.
Credlin nailed it. Shorten doesn’t look and sound like a PM.
A pathological phobia of water vehicles does not a policy make I guess.StOp Da BoAtZ!¡!¡!¡!¡!¡
I saw a clip of the show on Facebook once and she was bad. She kept stammering and and screwing up what she was saying.And Credlin doesn't sound like a TV commentator - what's your point? Or hers? He just doesn't have the vibe of the thing?
If the removal of negative gearing will not have an impact on housing prices, then how will it help housing affordability?
I cringe when Sharri Markson is onI saw a clip of the show on Facebook once and she was bad. She kept stammering and and screwing up what she was saying.
I have a feeling that million dollar bet on a Shorten victory may represent a News columnist betting syndicate.Bolt, Speers and Murray saying Shorten won?
Jesus. Did Morrison take a sh*t on the lectern or what?
When Morrison the one behind in the polls and puts on a pretty weak performance like that he knows he is just trying to save the furniture. If this was a real contest you would have seen him have a proper crack rather than spend an hour talk about nothing in particular.Bolt, Speers and Murray saying Shorten won?
Jesus. Did Morrison take a sh*t on the lectern or what?
Bolt, Speers and Murray saying Shorten won?
Jesus. Did Morrison take a sh*t on the lectern or what?
Maybe they've got internal polling suggesting that Abbott and Dutton aren't toast after all and a Morrison loss would be great for the dream team of Abbott and Dutton in opposition?Bolt also criticised his own paper for that article attacking Shorten’s Mum. Said that her achieving her goals decades later did not mean she didn’t make a genuine sacrifice.
Maybe a few see the writing on the wall and want to look fair and reasonable.
When Morrison the one behind in the polls and puts on a pretty weak performance like that he knows he is just trying to save the furniture. If this was a real contest you would have seen him have a proper crack rather than spend an hour talk about nothing in particular.
Bolt also criticised his own paper for that article attacking Shorten’s Mum. Said that her achieving her goals decades later did not mean she didn’t make a genuine sacrifice.
Maybe a few see the writing on the wall and want to look fair and reasonable.
'A political hit job': Labor braces for war with Murdoch media
By David Crowe
May 8, 2019 — 11.45pm
Labor is bracing for an escalating assault from News Corp and fears further attacks in the final days of the election campaign after a furious Bill Shorten savaged Rupert Murdoch's company over its reporting of his mother's life and career.
Mr Shorten and his senior colleagues accused the media empire of being a "cheer squad" for Prime Minister Scott Morrison and cited its use of tax havens in the Cayman Islands as one reason it wanted to stop Labor taking power on May 18.
Labor deputy leader Tanya Plibersek said the company was trying to block funding increases for schools and hospitals while protecting "tax loopholes".
"I wonder if that's got anything to do with the fact that Rupert Murdoch and his companies pay little or no tax in Australia? It could be something to do with the fact that News [Corp] has paid very little tax in Australia in recent years," Ms Plibersek said.
The sharp criticism of Mr Murdoch's company and its tax affairs is seen as a warning shot in a deepening dispute after years of friction and negative stories about Labor throughout the campaign.
In an emotional address to the media that saw him come close to tears, Mr Shorten slammed the company's Sydney newspaper, The Daily Telegraph, for a report that used the headline "mother of invention" and suggested he had misled voters about his mother.
Bolt is actually backing his own paper the Herald Sun who refused to publish the story. It’s a case of News Corp saying one thing up north and another down south, but all with the ultimate aim of getting the Tory’s back in.Bolt also criticised his own paper for that article attacking Shorten’s Mum. Said that her achieving her goals decades later did not mean she didn’t make a genuine sacrifice.
Maybe a few see the writing on the wall and want to look fair and reasonable.
Bolt is actually backing his own paper the Herald Sun who refused to publish the story. It’s a case of News Corp saying one thing up north and another down south, but all with the ultimate aim of getting the Tory’s back in.