Other six a 48 and some 60sOk. So base selection on 11 weeks and ignore all other games played?
And the other 6?
How’d he go in the last ten rounds?
Didnt play a single game in the last ten because of injury
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Other six a 48 and some 60sOk. So base selection on 11 weeks and ignore all other games played?
And the other 6?
How’d he go in the last ten rounds?
Yeah no idea why people would be looking at his past midfield performances now that he looks like to be moving back in there, how stupid is that. Sure, there's a lot more to the story but please, it's hardly irrelevant.Already had.
Love the selective data.
Over an eight game period Brent Stanton was a better SC scorer than GAJ at his prime; avg 137
Arrrgh. Don't remind me. I brought him in and lost my top 200 ranking soon after.Already had.
Love the selective data.
Over an eight game period Brent Stanton was a better SC scorer than GAJ at his prime; avg 137
Yep but only because Barrass is slightly cheaperSolid selection. D1.
He's not in my current team. Laird, Lloyd and William's are my starting 3 big boys.Cheers mate
You locking him in?
Absolutely agree with these concernsWalters the little campaigner will get some of Neale's midfield minutes.
Until there's some actual concrete evidence (meaning the 3 nab games) i'm not really buying the idea of Blakely playing in the midfield.
Bare in mind Brayshaw and Cerra will probably get more minutes in there as well. Then there's Waterhouse to worry about.
Short video on second page is interesting...
Will have already been covered but impact of new rule and decisions re stocking backline with play on from the kick-in style seagulls and pocketing higher clips from the word go vs seeing what backline rooks present vs other lines will be interesting.
He lock.I think Brodie Smith will take all the kick ins.
Do you still take Smith at that price, with an 80 average ?He lock.
90+ for 332k yes please
He hasn’t averaged 90 since 2011He lock.
90+ for 332k yes please
Do you still take Smith at that price, with an 80 average ?
If Collins is preferred by Dew over Hombsch, he will match Smith easily.No thanks. I'd rather a 123k rookie averaging 65-70. Those extra 10-15 points aren't worth 200k+ to me.
That's why i really haven't given Smith a serious thought .......none of us had him as an option in 2017 & it's just his low price that has caught Coaches attention.No thanks. I'd rather a 123k rookie averaging 65-70. Those extra 10-15 points aren't worth 200k+ to me.
He’s my current D5.Andrew Birch ....thoughts on Griffin Logue @ $164K ....2018 season wrecked by injury, surely in his 3rd year, he's a chance of a solid block of games
That's why i really haven't given Smith a serious thought .......none of us had him as an option in 2017 & it's just his low price that has caught Coaches attention.
But I'm like you & would prefer a $117K - $160K Rookie
Sure why notDo you still take Smith at that price, with an 80 average ?
Andrew Birch ....thoughts on Griffin Logue @ $164K ....2018 season wrecked by injury, surely in his 3rd year, he's a chance of a solid block of games
So ATS you're opting for Logue over Collins ? ......I don't think these two can hold down a KPD role, whereas Collins looks almost a lock at 194cm and 97kgsHe’s my current D5.
Will play every game if fit. Unsure of Collins JS with Dew/Hombsch.