- Oct 12, 2012
- 6,907
- 10,729
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Kinda feel like trading out next years first could be teasing someone to bid on Marra at 1 or 2, which may well be justified.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kinda feel like trading out next years first could be teasing someone to bid on Marra at 1 or 2, which may well be justified.
Yeah probably, and I'm on the record here suggesting we should downgrade next years first for points. But can't shake a worry that if we get too cocky/creative we'd end up getting screwed over somehow.I strongly feel this level of hype is off the mark.
I'd love if there was an unexpectedly high bid on Finn Maginness that wiped out Hawthorn's pick 11. I think that, and Port going for local in Gould, is really our only chance of getting McAsey.
I would draft Gould over McAsey. Gould is an elite kick who is strong enough to play KPD but a bit short. How many KPD can kick as well as Gould? He is like two players at once.
Port Adelaide OR Hawks will take Gould ahead of McAsey, so it won’t matter.
I don't see us paying the price of 13 and next year's first for any one player in this draft. I could however see us using it for a player after 13. Say Bergman or Rivers (or even possible Weightman) are still there late first round, we could use next year's first to trade in to take them. Now that Stevens isn't available to us we might not need the points haul we expected, and it might be a smart idea to trade out our first for something more valuable than just using it to match a bid.
do you think we might well end up with Gould?
sounds like a Bevo player.
Apparently not actually an NGA playerWhat happened with Stevens?
Evening all, I have your mob in our Freo mock draft and interested on your thoughts on who I should take at 13. Someone like McAsey or Gould seems to the best fit from what I can see or maybe a suitable small? With my later picks thinking a ruck plus a small forward/tall defender (whichever I don’t get at 13). Cheers.
Bid on Liam Henry first, he is the most suitable small, if a bid has not come already, that should make you popular.Evening all, I have your mob in our Freo mock draft and interested on your thoughts on who I should take at 13. Someone like McAsey or Gould seems to the best fit from what I can see or maybe a suitable small? With my later picks thinking a ruck plus a small forward/tall defender (whichever I don’t get at 13). Cheers.
Evening all, I have your mob in our Freo mock draft and interested on your thoughts on who I should take at 13. Someone like McAsey or Gould seems to the best fit from what I can see or maybe a suitable small? With my later picks thinking a ruck plus a small forward/tall defender (whichever I don’t get at 13). Cheers.
Think we’re all just happy if a bid for him occurs after pick 10 tbh. Am planning on bidding on him most likelyBid on Liam Henry first, he is the most suitable small, if a bid has not come already, that should make you popular.
Yeah was more thinking a mature ager for a bit of extra depth if I were to go down that directionRuck is a long way down our list of priorities. Good problem to have with our first choice ruck also being our young developing ruck. Trengove and Sweet are enough depth.
McAsey would be perfect, but if you can't get him another KPD later on would be good. Small forward and outside mid are other needs.
Best small in the draft by a fair way and I love his ties, Melbourne thinking about Weightman at pick 8 is sadThink we’re all just happy if a bid for him occurs after pick 10 tbh. Am planning on bidding on him most likely
I don’t mind Gould, could be a case of he’s too good to not take at 13 even if he’s not an obvious need.So I’m all in for either McAsey and Gould.
both would really add to our team defense/transition play.
our other key strength (quick hands) is well and truly sufficiently covered for the now and for the future