List Mgmt. 2019 Draft Prospects

[stefoid]

so Keath and Bruce haven't helped your health?

sure! But relying on this sort of thing happening again is like factoring tatts winnings into your retirement plan

 

[weltschmerz]

Wonder if we’re considering Worrell?

 

[flipper83]

Bulldogs have just tweeted about Gould.

I think there could be something to this...

 

[Barking Mad]

Bold prediction.....

We will draft 2 youngsters who will be welcomed with open arms and have a thread opened up welcoming them to the kennel.
Following this there will questions on whether they play round one. If they miss there will be a mix of impatience on why the likes is Suckling and Dickson are getting games before them and the rest questioning why we drafted them at all.

 

[flipper83]

Road to the Draft ran a mock draft, with Kemp falling to us. If it happened I'd be rapt.

The problem with their Phantom draft and a few others is that they had Green and Henry both bid on and matched with picks before ours. With clubs able to trade picks after a bid it's highly unlikely that gws and freo use their picks to match bids. Realistically there would be 2 more picks taken before we get a look in.

 

[theBigB]

Wonder if we’re considering Worrell?

We should be.

 

[Virgin Dog]

Bold prediction.....

We will draft 2 youngsters who will be welcomed with open arms and have a thread opened up welcoming them to the kennel.
Following this there will questions on whether they play round one. If they miss there will be a mix of impatience on why the likes is Suckling and Dickson are getting games before them and the rest questioning why we drafted them at all.

Come on, at least do a hard one

 

[VitalDread]

Would love to get Kemp
Him being out till late next year will help his development with Morris

 

[Munnez]

Kemp!!!! never thought he would fall past 10

Not guaranteed that he will is a chance though with the fact he did an ACL

 

[Yojimbo]

The problem with their Phantom draft and a few others is that they had Green and Henry both bid on and matched with picks before ours. With clubs able to trade picks after a bid it's highly unlikely that gws and freo use their picks to match bids. Realistically there would be 2 more picks taken before we get a look in.

Trent Rivers did not like it, missed the top thirty..

 

[LittleG]

The problem with their Phantom draft and a few others is that they had Green and Henry both bid on and matched with picks before ours. With clubs able to trade picks after a bid it's highly unlikely that gws and freo use their picks to match bids. Realistically there would be 2 more picks taken before we get a look in.

The top pick is still used to pay the points required, prior to using later picks. That hasn’t changed, has it?

 

[flipper83]

The top pick is still used to pay the points required, prior to using later picks. That hasn’t changed, has it?

Pretty sure clubs are now allowed to trade their pick after a bid has been made so if gws intend to match a bid they could trade that pick down for a collection of later/ future picks.
Not sure how many list spots they have available but that would affect the number of later picks they could use.

 

[Northernsoul74]

Pretty sure clubs are now allowed to trade their pick after a bid has been made so if gws intend to match a bid they could trade that pick down for a collection of later/ future picks.
Not sure how many list spots they have available but that would affect the number of later picks they could use.

This is now the case. BS rule but hope we can use it somehow for JUH.

 

[flipper83]

The best case scenario for us is if Melbourne bid on green and gws don't match.
Could potentially happen considering Melbourne don't have their 2020 first and will be looking for players to have immediate impact and gws are apparently keen on Jackson

 

[LittleG]

Pretty sure clubs are now allowed to trade their pick after a bid has been made so if gws intend to match a bid they could trade that pick down for a collection of later/ future picks.
Not sure how many list spots they have available but that would affect the number of later picks they could use.

So, they trade their pick to someone else.... who will pick a player at that slot.... a team we don’t know what their needs are. GWS will still have to use, say pick 12, if that is the pick they trade back to and then can keep whatever other picks they just traded in.

In that case all Phantom drafts are pretty much worthless. We don’t know who will pick at 6 IF a bid is made for Greene prior to that and GWS match the bid.

 

[TBOW]

So, they trade their pick to someone else.... who will pick a player at that slot.... a team we don’t know what their needs are. GWS will still have to use, say pick 12, if that is the pick they trade back to and then can keep whatever other picks they just traded in.

In that case all Phantom drafts are pretty much worthless. We don’t know who will pick at 6 IF a bid is made for Greene prior to that and GWS match the bid.

Well it depends on whether they trade back to before our pick or after.
I would imagine that both of those guys would be paid for with picks later than 14 which essentially means that two other players would shift up the draft order to replace those picks as Flipper suggested.

 

[flipper83]

Pretty much.
If gws traded back to 12 that would still work for us because that pick would then get used for green points but if it was traded for a pick after our pick then we are effectively ending up with pick 15.

 

[weltschmerz]

We should be.

Yeah I wouldn't be upset if we took Worrell, though if we're interested we're keeping it on the down-low.

People I think would be good picks at 13: McAsey, Kemp, Worrell, Gould
People I think would be good for us but maybe overs at 13: Pickett, Sharp, De Koning, maybe Bergman (haven't looked close enough into him)

 

[House_of_Dahl]

Wonder if we’re considering Worrell?

Seems too much like what we already have with Young and Keath.

 

[doggies ftw]

Wait can someone explain this to me?

Just say Greene gets bid on by Melb at pick 3, GWS can trade their pick 6? That makes no sense

 

[Northernsoul74]

Wait can someone explain this to me?

Just say Greene gets bid on by Melb at pick 3, GWS can trade their pick 6? That makes no sense

AFL confirmed last week this is the case. BS rule to try and encourage trading on the night.

 

[VitalDread]

Wait can someone explain this to me?

Just say Greene gets bid on by Melb at pick 3, GWS can trade their pick 6? That makes no sense

Clubs have a 5 min window to get a trade in for extra picks

So it would be like Pick 6 downgraded for two mid level picks (say Geelong)

 

[Northernsoul74]

Clubs have a 5 min window to get a trade in for extra picks

So it would be like Pick 6 downgraded for two mid level picks (say Geelong)

I assume they still need the list spaces etc.

 

[theBigB]

Seems too much like what we already have with Young and Keath.

Keath is 28 years old.

Young has shown some promise, but has not yet had a full season of consistency at AFL level.

Worrell is not too different from McAsey, yet just about everyone is all-in on the McAsey wagon.

 

[Virgin Dog]

Keath is 28 years old.

Young has shown some promise, but has not yet had a full season of consistency at AFL level.

Worrell is not too different from McAsey, yet just about everyone is all-in on the McAsey wagon.

McAsey is more of your one-on-one defender like Howard or Andrews, while Worrell is more of your interceptor type. McAsey fits the bigger need, has shown more talent, plus has the appeal of being a Dogs fan (although this is hardly relevant). McAsey is easily a top 10 prospect, which is why he's an attractive option at Pick 13, while Worrell is likely not going to be best available at that point