_RT_
Not A Minion
- Sep 17, 2006
- 49,908
- 101,664
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Furies Premiers 2010
- Moderator
- #1,126
Whole thing is horrificThat first trade is horrific lol
Dockers are in a world of hurt as well IMO, especially if Carlton bid on Henry at their first pick (currently 9 but likely to drop to 10) as the Dockers only have 536 points worth of picks in hand (470 once Green bid pushes back their current picks). To match a bid at pick 10, they require 1116 points after discount, which means they still require 646-580 points. That means next years first pick, say they had pick 10, would drop down to pick 27 once the deficit points are accounted for. Reckon that's a big price to pay for Henry who is small mid/forward.Interesting ...... from the AFL site
The Giants face the sticky and complicated situation of going into the most significant Draft Value Index (DVI) deficit in the system's five years of existence, depending on where a bid is placed on their Academy gun Tom Green.Rival clubs believe local foes Sydney – who holds pick No.5 in next week's draft – is the most likely team to call Green's name on Wednesday night, which would force GWS to find 1502 DVI points to match the bid.
However, after that particular selection, the Giants currently hold picks No.40, 59, 60, 80 and 94 later in the draft. Collectively, that equates to just 733 DVI points.
It means that all of those picks would be shifted to the back end of the draft order, while the club would still need to find a further 769 DVI points the following season to match the bid for Green.
While the numbers can be confusing, the bottom line is that it could leave the Giants facing the daunting prospect of starting next year's player movement period without a single pick until the third or potentially even the fourth round of the 2020 national draft.
That is in part due to the complicating factor that GWS traded its 2020 first-round selection in a deal with Adelaide on Tuesday in an effort to snare pick No.4 and potentially leapfrog a bid on Green.
Unfortunately i dont see many clubs coming for our later picks now that the latest trades have happened and the club's needing points are sorted, We can only trade them out for 2020 picks if clubs are desperate with a player they like still on the board , But i would rather trade out our 2020 picks than trade in picks for next year.
Better for us as we can sit back at the end of the second round and take our pick of the 3 best remaining kids on the board and address some list needs at the same time, while pick 56 probably comes forward to end up inside the top 50 as well. Just stockpile the talent and develop them the Richmond way and maintain the current successful era for as long as possible.







