- Jan 10, 2011
- 34,367
- 57,683
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Ormond AFC
I was just trying to see how you would find a way to disagree with meGood to see you taking notice again
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was just trying to see how you would find a way to disagree with meGood to see you taking notice again
If you believe that you should put your house on them because they are $4.50 to make the 8. You would end up with 4 and half housesCarlton are a better than even chance of making the 8 next year.
Get your point and agree sort ofI love lemons. If you need any head to oakleigh lemons on tap.
How this for a salty lemon grapefruit explosion.
Paddy 500k
Robo 600k
Dmac 350k
Hanners 800k
= 2.25 million a year in cap space.
What do they all have in common?
L.......
You didn’t even know where he played so how do you know that.I don't agree. He is very agile and good below his knees. He just needs to build up his tank for AFL footy. Once he does that we will have a good player on our hands and the best part is, it is for free (ie no draft picks).
I've seen him play quite a few times. ITK's have also said he is untapped talent.You didn’t even know where he played so how do you know that.
HahaI've seen him play quite a few times. ITK's have also said he is untapped talent.
LOL thats funny old P66 the poster who just loves being contrary to everyone on the forum to see what reaction he gets just to stir thingsI was just trying to see how you would find a way to disagree with me
They’re one injury away from being bottom 4.Carlton are a better than even chance of making the 8 next year.
If you believe that you should put your house on them because they are $4.50 to make the 8. You would end up with 4 and half houses
LOL thats funny old P66 the poster who just loves being contrary to everyone on the forum to see what reaction he gets just to stir things
Don't deny it you told me by Pm thats what you do to see reactions you get LOL
Lots of love to you again. Yes I deliberately go against others. Bruce will not get 13 and will not be held to his contract. Same with Steven. Maybe I go against others because I know I will be right and they will be wrong. All fun anyway.LOL thats funny old P66 the poster who just loves being contrary to everyone on the forum to see what reaction he gets just to stir things
Don't deny it you told me by Pm thats what you do to see reactions you get LOL
Thanks dad.I’ve not been on this forum for as long as some here but from what I can gather, plugger66 has pretty good opinions on footy. Not sure he’s being contrary just for the sake of it. Think he just has his opinions. And for what it’s worth they’re pretty sound...at least in my humble opinion.
Put half his family in thereWhat the fu** is he going to do with half a house
Thanks dad.
I once told plugger66 that I thought his posts were great and he disagreed with me.I’ve not been on this forum for as long as some here but from what I can gather, plugger66 has pretty good opinions on footy. Not sure he’s being contrary just for the sake of it. Think he just has his opinions. And for what it’s worth they’re pretty sound...at least in my humble opinion.
RubbishI once told plugger66 that I thought his posts were great and he disagreed with me.
In an ideal world you draft best available, then trade out if you end up with the wrong balance.
A case in point, is Bruce traded when we got King.
I'm not sure we executed well though.
We got unders for Bruce and King hasn't played a game yet.
If we traded Gresham for Whitfield, we lose 3 years, and we'd need to pay Whitfield to come here.
Everytime we trade a "good" player in we have to pay above average.
Its easy to see what happens if you do too much of it.
RIght now Gresham is our best small forward, our best at center clearances.
To me its nuts to trade him when we only have second rate players to do those things.
We haven't got enough players through the draft to generate a surplus in any role.
( except for a surplus of very average players ).
Thats not going to change soon, we have one decent pick in the next two drafts.
I don't agree. He is very agile and good below his knees. He just needs to build up his tank for AFL footy. Once he does that we will have a good player on our hands and the best part is, it is for free (ie no draft picks).
I wouldn't mind the saints making a big play for Ollie Wines next year, especially after Bing re-signed with the suns. Feels highly gettable and is the type of inside mid we need. Would be the missing piece in our squad. Feels like the blues would be his likely destination should he leave though.
I once told plugger66 that I thought his posts were great and he disagreed with me.
I think you are definitely trolling now. He looked as far off AFL as any kid I have seen. They literally had to get permission for him to play Ammos because he was so far off VFL footy still. If he makes it, he will have come from a million miles back. Stranger things have happened but .....
I think plugger66 and mowman going into a lawn mowing business together is more likely than Alabakis playing AFL
I don't agree. He is very agile and good below his knees. He just needs to build up his tank for AFL footy. Once he does that we will have a good player on our hands and the best part is, it is for free (ie no draft picks).
At the time we probably needed the good guy policy. It was put into place after the Milne, duthie etc etc stuff. It just went on too long.I think we thought we could get a midfield through free agency once we built our spine with players like Longer, Hickey, Paddy and Hugh. Good idea but every single part of it didn't work. I think our ridiculous good guy policy probably hurt Trout as well.