No Oppo Supporters 2019 General AFL Discussion

[ashep]

Wow...that’s so conclusive Would you care to show me snicko and hotspot? What a load of rubbish.

What do you think is going on if it isn't Greene dragging his fingers over Neale's eyes?

 

[bedford]

We're talking about the Norf Harvey, not the Aints one.

I know who im talking about champ.

 

[bedford]

Greene is a grub on and off the field and so is his breeding

 

[Mick Oxlong]

What do you think is going on if it isn't Greene dragging his fingers over Neale's eyes?

That’s fingers in the eye area, that’s not gouging. Fingers in the eye area is NOT a reportable offense. Now it’s up to you to prove to me that he gouged, which is what the tribunal is ‘assuming’!

Now again, snicko and hotspot please!

 

[The King!]

How many games did I say goose , would have played a lot more if they kept SOO

lol you said he stood out always for the big v.... so its based on if they kept it? turn it up caeser

 

[Mick Oxlong]

What do you think is going on if it isn't Greene dragging his fingers over Neale's eyes?

 

[Mick Oxlong]

lol you said he stood out always for the big v.... so its based on if they kept it? turn it up caeser

Is there a minimum?

 

[bedford]

lol you said he stood out always for the big v.... so its based on if they kept it? turn it up caeser

That is the biggest insult to me on here 88

 

[ashep]

That’s fingers in the eye area, that’s not gouging. Fingers in the eye area is NOT a reportable offense. Now it’s up to you to prove to me that he gouged, which is what the tribunal is ‘assuming’!

Now again, snicko and hotspot please!

I think you ought to read up on the actual charge because "gouge" isn't mentioned so I don't have to prove that at all.

If you want to argue that what Greene did isn't suspension-worthy then we can agree to disagree. I'm of the opinion that there is absolutely no place for it in footy. What you simply cannot do is suggest that the evidence is "inconclusive". He did what he was charged with.

 

[Mick Oxlong]

I think you ought to read up on the actual charge because "gouge" isn't mentioned.

If you want to argue that what Greene did isn't suspension-worthy then we can agree to disagree. I'm of the opinion that there is absolutely no place for it in footy. What you simply cannot do is suggest that the evidence is "inconclusive". He did what he was charged with.

I think you need to read up on the rules because what the flog was charged with (he’s undeniably a flog) is not even an offense under AFL rules. And again, show me snicko and hotspot...I too can swing at a ball, doesn’t mean I hit it!

 

[The King!]

Is there a minimum?

is2 times always

i always give to charity then

i dunno, im bored, and just interacting with the great man

 

[Mick Oxlong]

is2 times always

i always give to charity then

i dunno, im bored, and just interacting with the great man

Should we call him ‘Sir’?

 

[ashep]

I think you need to read up on the rules because what the flog was charged with (he’s undeniably a flog) is not even an offense under AFL rules. And again, show me snicko and hotspot...I too can swing at a ball, doesn’t mean I hit it!

Now you're just making stuff up.

Laws of Australian Football
21.2.2 Reportable Offences
(a) Intentionally or carelessly
(viii) making unreasonable or uneccessary contact with the eye region of another person

 

[The King!]

Should we call him ‘Sir’?

what do you order for breakfast

- poached eggs
- fried eggs
- scrambled eggs
- dippy egg with soldiers
- no *en eggs

 

[Mick Oxlong]

what do you order for breakfast

- poached eggs
- fried eggs
- scrambled eggs
- dippy egg with soldiers
- no fu**en eggs

I think you know

 

[Mick Oxlong]

Now you're just making stuff up.

Laws of Australian Football
21.2.2 Reportable Offences
(a) Intentionally or carelessly
(viii) making unreasonable or uneccessary contact with the eye region of another person

Am I? I’m pretty sure the media, players and advocates have been all over it.

Edit: you’re also assuming he raked and gouged. Any player that has pushed another in the face, aren’t they meeting the criteria of that rule also?

 

[The King!]

I think you know

Disgusting

 

[ashep]

Am I? I’m pretty sure the media, players and advocates have been all over it.

Edit: you’re also assuming he raked and gouged.

I couldn't give a stuff what they're saying. It's right there in black and white in the laws of the game so if you or anyone else says what he was charged with isn't even an offence, you're factually incorrect.

And no I am not assuming he "raked and gouged". I'm acknowledging the evidence which clearly shows he made unnecessary and unreasonable contact.

This is what pisses me off about this situation. So many people going off half cocked not understanding what they're actually talking about.

 

[Mick Oxlong]

I couldn't give a stuff what they're saying. It's right there in black and white in the laws of the game so if you or anyone else says what he was charged with isn't even an offence, you're factually incorrect.

And no I am not assuming he "raked and gouged". I'm acknowledging the evidence which clearly shows he made unnecessary and unreasonable contact.

This is what pisses me off about this situation. So many people going off half cocked not understanding what they're actually talking about.

Read my edit. Push in the face, how is it different?

And I’m not going off hard cocked but do you know what you’re talking about? It’s ok, you’re clearly a Greene is a flog, let’s rub him out hopinda guy, that’s ok, I’m a prove it guy. How’s snicko and hotspot going?

 

[ashep]

Read my edit. Push in the face, how is it different?

And I’m not going off hard cocked but do you know what you’re talking about? It’s ok, you’re clearly a Greene is a flog, let’s rub him out hopinda guy, that’s ok, I’m a prove it guy. How’s snicko and hotspot going?

"There's no evidence!"
Produce video evidence
"That's not a gouge!"
He wasn't charged with gouging
"Yeah but whatever he was charged with isn't even a rule"
Here's the specific paragraph in the Laws of Australian Football
"....yeah but that's not a gouge!"
He wasn't charged with gouging
"....where's the proof!"

Mate I've got nothing else to "prove" here.

 

[The King!]

mick is fired up tonight

 

[Mick Oxlong]

"There's no evidence!"
Produce video evidence
"That's not a gouge!"
He wasn't charged with gouging
"Yeah but whatever he was charged with isn't even a rule"
Here's the specific paragraph in the Laws of Australian Football
"....yeah but that's not a gouge!"

Mate I've got nothing else to "prove" here.

Of course you don’t, you’re not on the MRO or tribunal, or appeals committee. But you’re innocent unless proven guilty of any offence and I’m sorry, IMO, he’s not guilty (even for a f’wit). There’s no proof that what he did was any more dangerous than pushing someone in the face!

 

[Mick Oxlong]

mick is fired up tonight

Am I? Would I be reported because I was, I don’t know, aggressive?

 

[The King!]

Am I?

you seem a little aggressive, bit Papley like

 

[Mick Oxlong]

you seem a little aggressive, bit Papley like

Papley’s stupid...vaginas are everywhere (I’m sure he knows but I’m just going with the ‘homesick’ rumour). Homesick my arse!