He played 22 games for them this year...
wow, sorry i just checked and to my surprise you are right
88 games over 8 season suggest a fringe or injury restricted player.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
He played 22 games for them this year...
Great if trueSimply. No. Will not even be contemplated. Could well be next Cap.
Simply. No. Will not even be contemplated. Could well be next Cap.
My general rule interpretation of this:
My general rule of interpretation of this is, if it's from a random trade facebook page it is 99% dog shite.My general rule interpretation of this:
- I'm sure Hawthorn have enquired about Whitfield. But they enquire about many players from all clubs every year.
- Hawks openly discuss many trade value permutations in all of these discussions. It's ridiculous to think the hawks have landed on a combo and slapped it on the table as a final offer, or even starting bid, while the player is still in finals and under contract.
- It's much more likely that the hawks have floated a number of combinations past GWS to see what they're interested in.
- no trade involving Hawthorn is complete without weird 3rd and 4th round pick swaps.
- You need to charge your phone.
Time to change your name buddy. Dont want him(cogs) associated with the hawks anymore.Obviously not real but if it was I would do this deal, worth it.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
My general rule interpretation of this:
- I'm sure Hawthorn have enquired about Whitfield. But they enquire about many players from all clubs every year.
- Hawks openly discuss many trade value permutations in all of these discussions. It's ridiculous to think the hawks have landed on a combo and slapped it on the table as a final offer, or even starting bid, while the player is still in finals and under contract.
- It's much more likely that the hawks have floated a number of combinations past GWS to see what they're interested in.
- no trade involving Hawthorn is complete without weird 3rd and 4th round pick swaps.
- You need to charge your phone.
One small addition:
- these rumour websites have the same amount of inside knowledge as my dog. ‘Strong rumours’ my backside ...
Time to change your name buddy. Dont want him(cogs) associated with the hawks anymore.
I have suspicions something is up. Frost will be a bit player if in fact correct. From what I hear, he is one of a couple we are speaking to in the KPD space. Frost was muted in the Lewis deal.
Every contact I have saying the same. Just think fundamentals. We budgeted for 1.1m for Cogs, possibly $1.5m first year front ended. I understood back in June we were expecting an additional net $1.5m based on List movements.
Simply that is nearly $3m pure. My numbers might be slightly out..........but still !!!
Something has to give with Plan B. or C.
Cap space is not the issue. Trade or Draft collateral is.
This is GW’s challenge.
hahahahaCan confirm as a Dees supporter that Frost is not worth pick 10. That's delusional.
I will entertain a straight swap for an ageing Gunstan or Smith.
This is best comment I’ve read in weeks. Good for you Leather PoisoningMy general rule interpretation of this:
- I'm sure Hawthorn have enquired about Whitfield. But they enquire about many players from all clubs every year.
- Hawks openly discuss many trade value permutations in all of these discussions. It's ridiculous to think the hawks have landed on a combo and slapped it on the table as a final offer, or even starting bid, while the player is still in finals and under contract.
- It's much more likely that the hawks have floated a number of combinations past GWS to see what they're interested in.
- no trade involving Hawthorn is complete without weird 3rd and 4th round pick swaps.
- You need to charge your phone.
With Cegs getting 3 years, Macca being resigned earlier this year, and IIRC young Ned Reeves just recently getting a 1 or 2 year extension, would it be a fair assumption that Pitto may be out the door?
He signed another year. He is a project ruckman, he may take time.Where did you see Reeves get that contract. He's a genuine laughing stock and will be off the list next year. I spoke to some people on the weekend that are genuinely astonished he's on an afl list
Captain of which club?Simply. No. Will not even be contemplated. Could well be next Cap.
The main reason I wouldn’t do that trade is that I reckon it could end up winning GWS a premiership. Smith on the wing for them and Big Boy in the ruck to me even though losing Whitfield would push them over the top.
Why don’t you just post with your real account.
The main reason I wouldn’t do that trade is that I reckon it could end up winning GWS a premiership. Smith on the wing for them and Big Boy in the ruck to me even though losing Whitfield would push them over the top.
The HFC website.Where did you see Reeves get that contract.
As much as i deplore Gil and the afl this attitude is a bit like throwing the toys out of the cot. Just because it happened once doesn’t mean it will apply for ever more. If at first you don’t succeed try try again.Time to move on from trying to get elite talent from GilWS.
Gil will allow the Giants to cook the books however they see fit to keep players there.
I wouldn’t bother wasting our time.
He knocked back a four year deal on huge money last year. Was going to be part of the TL deal.
So what your saying Tops is that where trading BB to GWS where he’ll sign a 250k per season x 5 years with an additional 1.25m per season as the ambassador of all the really really big peopleBased on something just said to me by someone I trust “Cegs three years gives us flexibility”.
His comment surprised.
All I know is it will take an enormous offer to get BB out of Vic.