- Apr 20, 2006
- 9,140
- 12,201
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Betts I’m neither here nor there but I would probably prefer him on the list to Lang or Polson next season so would be happy enough for the club to delist one of them and bring him in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As it sits, Lebois leaving has us with the standard four rookies plus Owies as a category B. No rookie vacancy unless we promote someone or alter our divide.Is anybody able to let us know, how many list spots we have atm. So far we have thomas,fasolo,pickett,garlett,lobbe,kerr,schumacher and lebois off the list thats 8. Just not sure how it works with the likes of deluca and gibbons joining us half way through the year, and we have 5 on the rookie list already? I'm just trying to work out how many players we will probably be trading for and how many we'll take in the draft.
On the fence with Betts.
Can find an argument for him and can just as easily find an argument against him.
What happens, happens but the supporters best not to expect too much from Eddie, should we acquire him.
I'd be happy with a dozen or so reasonable games and a bit of magic here and there. That would do.
Is anybody able to let us know, how many list spots we have atm. So far we have thomas,fasolo,pickett,garlett,lobbe,kerr,schumacher and lebois off the list thats 8. Just not sure how it works with the likes of deluca and gibbons joining us half way through the year, and we have 5 on the rookie list already? I'm just trying to work out how many players we will probably be trading for and how many we'll take in the draft.
Is anybody able to let us know, how many list spots we have atm. So far we have thomas,fasolo,pickett,garlett,lobbe,kerr,schumacher and lebois off the list thats 8. Just not sure how it works with the likes of deluca and gibbons joining us half way through the year, and we have 5 on the rookie list already? I'm just trying to work out how many players we will probably be trading for and how many we'll take in the draft.
Re Cameron, I have never seen him play to be honest, (was probably getting a haircutWhat I want to see from the CFC is that once a player comes to us, they become the better player.
Hard to say whether we now have the right formula in place with Teague & Russell, but it's what we need to show for future players wanting to come to us.
No team can get this right 100% of the time, but we have to become more of a Hawthorn in this department than a Melbourne.
Re. Cameron:
What is it exactly do we see in a 24/5 year old that has a history of having played 1 AFL game?
Even when he had the door open to him this year, Sydney opted for non-ruckman in front of him. What do we see?
Yep. I can't see why we are breaking balls to get a small forward in ahead of (still) the best crumbing forward in the game. We don't lose with Eddie. He will bring back those members from the wilderness and boost membership numbers. He will play the role we need for a couple of years until he retires, and it's time to get someone else, at which point I suspect we'll have a lot more players lining up to come to the club. When he's finished, he will be a great person to keep on for player development not to mention while he's playing. All this I for (I suspect) very low cost to the club.Eddie over Butler all day long. Its not even a debate I would suggest.
I really don't like the idea of recruiting a player that played 'x' role and turned them into a player that plays the 'y' role...........but -
If we are taking on Papley and Martin and then still reeling in Butler and maybe even Betts, something has to give.
Is it possible that we've sold the notion of Martin playing in our backline?
I'm likely miles off, but I can now see Martin being that exit-player we've been craving for and especially so as Simpson will surely be in his last year and output may drop-off through the course of the year. Maybe?
I really don't like the idea of recruiting a player that played 'x' role and turned them into a player that plays the 'y' role...........but -
If we are taking on Papley and Martin and then still reeling in Butler and maybe even Betts, something has to give.
Is it possible that we've sold the notion of Martin playing in our backline?
I'm likely miles off, but I can now see Martin being that exit-player we've been craving for and especially so as Simpson will surely be in his last year and output may drop-off through the course of the year. Maybe?
Or we are aiming to return SPS to the midfield. Martin makes sense across a number of scenarios.I really don't like the idea of recruiting a player that played 'x' role and turned them into a player that plays the 'y' role...........but -
If we are taking on Papley and Martin and then still reeling in Butler and maybe even Betts, something has to give.
Is it possible that we've sold the notion of Martin playing in our backline?
I'm likely miles off, but I can now see Martin being that exit-player we've been craving for and especially so as Simpson will surely be in his last year and output may drop-off through the course of the year. Maybe?
I really don't like the idea of recruiting a player that played 'x' role and turned them into a player that plays the 'y' role...........but -
If we are taking on Papley and Martin and then still reeling in Butler and maybe even Betts, something has to give.
Is it possible that we've sold the notion of Martin playing in our backline?
I'm likely miles off, but I can now see Martin being that exit-player we've been craving for and especially so as Simpson will surely be in his last year and output may drop-off through the course of the year. Maybe?
We arent?We all love Eddie, however, given we aren't yet in "win now" mode
Or we are aiming to return SPS to the midfield. Martin makes sense across a number of scenarios.
What, for 1 year?
Far better or is it just a bit easier for him to find the ball? Still think his most inflential work is in the middle, his best game was in the middle, and maybe another pre season gets him there permanently.Why would we? He has played far better playing of halfback than he has through the midfield.
Far better or us it just a bit easier for him to find the ball? Still think his most inflential work is in the middle, and maybe another pre season gets him there permanently.
Plus the imminent return of Docherty and likely inclusion if Martin causes a reshuffle.
How Doc returns isn't the question...yet. If he gets through pre season he will have a spot waiting, and will be given time to make it his again.I certainly don't see Martin playing off half back. I also am far from bullish about Docherty's return. He wont have played for more than two years. Far from convinced he will be anything like he was previously.
We finished 5 games out of finals let alone being serious contenders, coupled with our young talent still being quite green would indicate that we're not.We arent?