Stephens at 7 is a must for mine, the exact type of young player we need. Have a feeling if we go with what's left of the sliders of Ash/Serong/Kemp at 7 then Melbourne or Carlton bid on Henry at 8 or 9. Stephens makes the most sense if available.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah it'd be a bit of a mind blower to select a small forward that high up in the top 10.Don't reckon the Dees will do it unless they actually think he is the 3rd best player in the draft.
Is there any chance that Melbourne could throw a big curveball. They are really into Henry and know we'll match their pick 8 bid. What if they go for Henry at 3 thinking we won't match with a price that high. Maybe they think the calibre of player they want will still be available at pick 8 (Someone like Ash) and they can get both players this way. Is it that unthinkable for "the best small forward in the draft"?
Just playing devils advocate - obviously I'd like Henry and hope there won't be any early bids, but we all think that which is kind of the point.
EFMIn true Freo style we won't match the early Henry bid and we will draft 2 players with 7 & 10 that were predicted to go much later, from Victoria, one who will take 4 years to develop and with a long term Vic gf who needs her family support, the other with fragile bones that break during important early season games.
I think this would be close to doable, but Belly needs to get on his bike. Each trade slightly favours the other club, but in the end we come out in front. Bell will need to be shrewd.
22, future 2nd, future 3rd >> 17,36 (Geelong)
7,10,17,36,58,69
10, 36 >> 8 (Melbourne)
7,8,17,58,69 (79,83).........
We use 7,8 on Stephens + Ash/Flanders/Robertson, and 17 on a Henry bid. I'll be bloody annoyed to miss out on Sharp, but such is life.We'll have 48,58,69 (70 + 83) as spec picks if we have list room, which we probably won't. Hang onto the others for points next year.
Okily Dokilysounds like a bit of Flanders is what the Crows need right now to get them out of their melancholy
They already did that with Petracca a few drafts ago since he doesn't have the tank to play midfield. Surely they won't do it deliberately, although you could argue that Henry will end up a mid/forward like Walters.Yeah it'd be a bit of a mind blower to select a small forward that high up in the top 10.
Yeah but petracca was very solid build he could play from round 1. Henry is scrawny doubt someone would bid on him that high because of his build.They already did that with Petracca a few drafts ago since he doesn't have the tank to play midfield. Surely they won't do it deliberately, although you could argue that Henry will end up a mid/forward like Walters.
Plus they also drafted Ned McHenry last year. Shithouse effort not to commit to it by themI heard Adelaide were really keen on Flanders when Scott Burns was looking as their possible head coach. Brodie Smith is nicknamed Smithers for those that didn't know.
That would have been awesome
Petracca was more a money man who had claims to midfield development, in the vein of D. Martin and Raynor.They already did that with Petracca a few drafts ago since he doesn't have the tank to play midfield. Surely they won't do it deliberately, although you could argue that Henry will end up a mid/forward like Walters.
I heard Adelaide were really keen on Flanders when Scott Burns was looking as their possible head coach. Brodie Smith is nicknamed Smithers for those that didn't know.
That would have been awesome
Okily Dokily
We don't have the list spots to take our picks to the draft let alone picking up a DFAAnyone into Robertson as a DFA?
We need to replace two wingers, and a small forward. I'd expect JLo would want more outside class, speed. Stephens with Henry gives usExpanded AFL Phantom Draft: Risers, sliders and new names
With the free agency and trade periods over, attention now turns to the draft. Chris Doerre has analysed all the possibilities to expand his phantom draft into the first two rounds.www.espn.com.au
Literally the worst outcome
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It probably is, but Ash, Henry and Day still bring serious speed and skill into our side. Change Ash for Stephens I'd be giving a big tick.Expanded AFL Phantom Draft: Risers, sliders and new names
With the free agency and trade periods over, attention now turns to the draft. Chris Doerre has analysed all the possibilities to expand his phantom draft into the first two rounds.www.espn.com.au
Literally the worst outcome
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It probably is, but Ash, Henry and Day still bring serious speed and skill into our side. Change Ash for Stephens I'd be giving a big tick.
As long as they get on the scoreboardIt probably is, but Ash, Henry and Day still bring serious speed and skill into our side. Change Ash for Stephens I'd be giving a big tick.