True, better kick though. It's either him, Bewley, Giro or a draftee if Ed goes though.Tucker isn't fast enough.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True, better kick though. It's either him, Bewley, Giro or a draftee if Ed goes though.Tucker isn't fast enough.
Shill, sturt, carter, duman, colyer would be in the mix as wellTrue, better kick though. It's either him, Bewley, Giro or a draftee if Ed goes though.
Define “enough “?Tucker isn't fast enough.
Agree long term some of those boys are definitely options. Can probably add Henry to it as well.Shill, sturt, carter, duman, colyer would be in the mix as well
He is quicker than Mundy, but slower than Hughes. If he was a key to our ball movement, playing on a wing, I'd send an athlete to him purely to tag and Tucker will NEVER find space. Langdon and Hill create the space by foot speed.
I'd send an athlete to him purely to tag and Tucker will NEVER find space.
Tucker has played the wing a majority of his career. He doesn’t get enough of it, and isn’t fast enough. Langdon uses his speed and endurance at the same time to get his disposals. Tucker will struggle in that role tbhBrad Hill and Tucker (not as proven in the role though).
No.Anthony McDonald-Tipungwuti.
should we look at him. Ideally he takes Switta spot, provides the same pressure butkicjs goals.
If that happens, I want a fresh start in the coaching department as well.Heard today North is likely for Brad Hill and Langdon maybe Melbourne.
If correct based on Stephen Hills offer we can expect band 1 compo.
Brad Hill would require Norths first.
Langdon would require Melbournes second
That takes us to the draft with 7,8,9,21,25 based on current ladder positions.
7,8,9 used on draft with 21 on Henry gives us 4 genuine top ten talent from 1 draft pool.
Horrible for the short term but if we nail it outstanding for the long term
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
No.
He has a very bad habit of getting in way of leading forwards.
We can't just keep going to the draft for high picks, it is a lottery and then you have to wait about 3 seasons or 50-60 games before they can even be something. We have got players like Langdon and Tucker to those marks, we can't just keep starting over again as our drafting has been pretty hit and miss anyway.Heard today North is likely for Brad Hill and Langdon maybe Melbourne.
If correct based on Stephen Hills offer we can expect band 1 compo.
Brad Hill would require Norths first.
Langdon would require Melbournes second
That takes us to the draft with 7,8,9,21,25 based on current ladder positions.
7,8,9 used on draft with 21 on Henry gives us 4 genuine top ten talent from 1 draft pool.
Horrible for the short term but if we nail it outstanding for the long term
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I think we need to be consistently making finals before we think about top 4.B: Nathan Wilson (26) Joel Hamling (26) Luke Ryan (23)
HB: Connor Blakely (23) Alex Pearce (25) Griffin Logue (21)
C: Brad Hill (26) Adam Cerra (19) Stephen Hill (29)
HF: Michael Walters (28)
F: Sam Sturt (18) Jesse Hogan (24) liam henry (17)
R: Rory Lobb (26) Nathan Fyfe (27) Andrew Brayshaw (19)
B:
Trade bait: Darcy, Langdon
I really like Lobb's mobility, which means we should consider trading Darcy especially if helps fill some of our other weaknesses.
I personally don't feel Matera or Switta should be near the best 22, so this is something we should target this year either through the draft or trade.
I think Cox or Taberner will fill the other KPF role, with Sturt as the mobile 3rd tall.
The midfield already lacks speed and skills, so idealy this is another thing we can target this year.
The big question is how far away are we from the top 4?
Should we push for a flag now, or hit the draft?
I like to think if we have our best 22 on the park we are close to top 4, but that appears to be a big if plus we tend to run our players into the ground during the year.
The way that GC are going I think the AFL would step in and stop any S Hill type signing if the amounts that have been spoken about are even half correct. Also if we lose Langdon and B Hill in the 1 year there goes all of our speed on the outside which we can't replace with anyone in our current squad.Heard today North is likely for Brad Hill and Langdon maybe Melbourne.
If correct based on Stephen Hills offer we can expect band 1 compo.
Brad Hill would require Norths first.
Langdon would require Melbournes second
That takes us to the draft with 7,8,9,21,25 based on current ladder positions.
7,8,9 used on draft with 21 on Henry gives us 4 genuine top ten talent from 1 draft pool.
Horrible for the short term but if we nail it outstanding for the long term
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com