MRP / Trib. 2019 MRP Chook Lotto - Carlton Tribunal News & Reports

[Iamcarlton]

Ive just gone through the AFL rule book and the only possible thing he could be done for is unreasonable or unnecessary contact with an umpire.
If there was unnecessary contact, then you would argue that contact between walsh and degoey didnt cause the contact to the umpire as degoey was already in that position and the contact didnt cause him to move.
Honestly it is a farce as the contact is so ridiculously miniscule I doubt anyone even knew about it.

Correct the contact from Sam didn't change Degoeys path as Degoey kept going on the same path into the contest to where he set up almost behind the ump .
The problem was Degoey set up too close to directly behind where the umpire was reversing after the bounce .
The fine will be reversed surely .

 

[GodisNavyBlue]

Knowing how ****** the AFL tribunal is T the Walsh could end up suspended. A nice side effect for the AFL would be that he would then be ineligible for the NAB Rising Star

On SM-A520F using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Funk]

This happened in the first quarter.

At least we know why the umps screwed us over for the rest of the day.

 

[Dadda Dave]

When do the umps front the judiciary for bringing the game into disrepute for blatantly cheating??

 

[koutamarto]

Yep and the push was so minuscule that Degoey still sharked the tap out .
If anything there should be an exclusion zone from which players can't enter when the umpire is bouncing and then reversing out of .
Of which I was of the understanding they do have .
Degoey was almost directly behind the umpire when bouncing Walsh was on the other side any sort of contact which I believe does happen in the AFL and Degoey runs into the umpire .
Its Degoey here that should be penalised for setting up so close behind the umpire .

I vaguely remember something in the rules changing around the space behind umpires over the off season. cant remember exactly what it was though!

Im wiht you 100%. whats a man to do? Not contest?

 

[thylacine60]

If Judd deems the better players deserve preferential treatment because they are just that he is wronger than the time that person was really wrong that time.

 

[Healer]

When do the umps front the judiciary for bringing the game into disrepute for blatantly cheating??

Ump got in the way of play.
How the **** could Walshy know that TooGooey would trip the Ump.

 

[Ruckus]

Given the erratic nature of the AFL's tribunal system, you need to choose your battles wisely - while I think Walsh being singled-out for a fine in this case is harsh, I'm not sure it's worth running the gauntlet of the 'inconsistencies' of the system, shall we say. The system is so flimsy and makey-uppy that I think I'd be inclined in this case to just cop the fine and move on.

Having said that, here's to common sense prevailing, and the charge being thrown out.

 

[thylacine60]

Given the erratic nature of the AFL's tribunal system, you need to choose your battles wisely - while I think Walsh being singled-out for a fine in this case is harsh, I'm not sure it's worth running the gauntlet of the 'inconsistencies' of the system, shall we say. The system is so flimsy and makey-uppy that I think I'd be inclined in this case to just cop the fine and move on.

Having said that, here's to common sense prevailing, and the charge being thrown out.

which is pretty much where they want clubs to be I imagine.........we don't know wtf is going to happen so how the hell can you?

 

[ajb72]

If Walsh had pushed DeGoey into the umpires area, then sure he is responsible.
But in this case Degoey was already there, it isnt Walsh's responsiblity to let him leave the area uninhibited.

The AFL advocate will argue that Walsh's actions caused the trip as DeGoey was trying to avoid the umpire but couldnt due to Walsh.
It is pretty basic to argue the reponse that it is DeGoey's fault as he was in the area already, and Walsh prevented him from leaving it, he did not push him into the area. They may argue that he shouldve let him leave the area, but that opens up players deliberately starting behind the umpire so they can get an unimpeeded run.

Honestly this years MRP is the worst of all time.

 

[Dadda Dave]

If Walsh had pushed DeGoey into the umpires area, then sure he is responsible.
But in this case Degoey was already there, it isnt Walsh's responsiblity to let him leave the area uninhibited.

The AFL advocate will argue that Walsh's actions caused the trip as DeGoey was trying to avoid the umpire but couldnt due to Walsh.
It is pretty basic to argue the reponse that it is DeGoey's fault as he was in the area already, and Walsh prevented him from leaving it, he did not push him into the area. They may argue that he shouldve let him leave the area, but that opens up players deliberately starting behind the umpire so they can get an unimpeeded run.

Honestly this years MRP is the worst of all time.

That's only because Christian and co are looking after their mates that is creating inconsistency..
It's a farce and there's no other word for it..

 

[Jeremias]

Misconduct?

That's ******* laughable. How embarrassing for the AFL that footage of the incident has been released.

We erred by not challenging the Setterfield incident, I'm glad we're not making the mistake here.

If he doesn't get off it's a disgrace.

 

[teagueyubeauty]

Given the erratic nature of the AFL's tribunal system, you need to choose your battles wisely - while I think Walsh being singled-out for a fine in this case is harsh, I'm not sure it's worth running the gauntlet of the 'inconsistencies' of the system, shall we say. The system is so flimsy and makey-uppy that I think I'd be inclined in this case to just cop the fine and move on.

Having said that, here's to common sense prevailing, and the charge being thrown out.

**** that, should have appealed Setterfields and they should sue the MRP for wasting everybody’s time tonight

 

[Aphrodite]

Marcus Clarke

 

[Dadda Dave]

Misconduct?

That's ******* laughable. How embarrassing for the AFL that footage of the incident has been released.

We erred by not challenging the Setterfield incident, I'm glad we're not making the mistake here.

If he doesn't get off it's a disgrace.

Be prepared to be for disappointment..

 

[Aphrodite]

**** **** ****

What a farce!

 

[Dadda Dave]

****

I'm shocked to be sitting here..
How can they sleep at night..

 

[Aphrodite]

Shame Walshy didn't change his surname to Ablett!

 

[Dadda Dave]

Some of these desicions are making our great game the laughing stock .

 

[Dadda Dave]

Shame Walshy didn't change his name to Ablett!

Maybe if Walshy shaved his arse and walked backwards the judiciary would of confused him for Gazz and thought "there's nothing to see here ...move on"..

 

[VeinGlorious]

Shame Walshy didn't change his name to Ablett!

This. Is. Gold

P.s New avatar is boss Aph

 

[Aphrodite]

This. Is. Gold

P.s New avatar is boss Aph

Changed it from Cersei.

 

[thylacine60]

Shame Walshy didn't change his name to Ablett!

magnificent!!

 

[thylacine60]

Changed it from Cersei.

pffft......

 

[Aphrodite]

pffft......

Shut up.