MRP / Trib. 2019 MRP Chook Lotto - Carlton Tribunal News & Reports

Remove this Banner Ad

Just glad it's a fine only - don't think Daisy will be too upset.

Takes the field next week and helps us to another win.

The club should cover this type of bullsh!t fine just to show that they support players who go in hard at the contest.
What else was Daisy supposed to do? Squib the contest to avoid knocking the opposition player over? How would that have looked? Is that what the AFL wants us to see?
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Saw some clip of Christian explaining the decisions on Facebook. Said the players would not find it unacceptable for Hodge to have his genitals grabbed so no fine for his opponent. Not sure too many would agree that it is now considered ok to do that, would be classed as sexual assault at a nightclub.

No explanation for the Daisy decision given, all others discussed. Pretty sure there is no reasonable explanation for it so was off limits in the regular interview spot.

Christian has lost the plot.
 
Saw some clip of Christian explaining the decisions on Facebook. Said the players would not find it unacceptable for Hodge to have his genitals grabbed so no fine for his opponent. Not sure too many would agree that it is now considered ok to do that, would be classed as sexual assault at a nightclub.

No explanation for the Daisy decision given, all others discussed. Pretty sure there is no reasonable explanation for it so was off limits in the regular interview spot.

Christian has lost the plot.
What?? He said they wouldn't find it unacceptable?? Unbelievable.
 
Way too much bias going on with the mrp.

I think some pre processing should be done on potential incidents before they reach Christian.

Video should be changed to grayscale with faces and club emblems pixelated.

Only half joking.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

What?? He said they wouldn't find it unacceptable?? Unbelievable.
Yep, even had a good old chuckle with the host. The bloke is sickening
 
The club should cover this type of bullsh!t fine just to show that they support players who goes in hard at the contest.
What else was Daisy supposed to do? Squib the contest to avoid knocking the opposition player over? How would that have looked? Is that what the AFL wants us to see?
717602
 
It just lacks all consistency, precedence is not considered. It still does my head in how they went softly, softly with the "little master's" 3 clearly deliberate strikes.
Daisy and Setters were both given the rough end of the pineapple.
****em. Bring on premierships 17,18,19, 20, a couple of Brownlows and at least 1 Rising star
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top