Just looking at it and I reckon ill start with Hurn again next year.
Just adds so much needed sexiness to my team.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Just looking at it and I reckon ill start with Hurn again next year.
Just adds so much needed sexiness to my team.
Is that one of Hurns thighs in a bikini ?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
No Grundy wasn't in my starting side. Traded him in prior to round 5. I started with Nank in the hope he would have the kind of breakout season that Grundy had.Question then.....was Grundy in your starting side ?
I'm certainly not denigrating Grundy .....but it would be highly unusual for a 30 point average increase year on, to be maintained .....I'd expect a 10 point fall, to a 117 average
I agree ....that's what this forum is about ...yes there's the shit-stirring on gameday, but these debates are healthy, with no wrong answersNo Grundy wasn't in my starting side. Traded him in prior to round 5. I started with Nank in the hope he would have the kind of breakout season that Grundy had.
I get what you are saying and don't disagree. It's rare that a player averages more than 120 for two seasons in a row. Only the best of the best back it up. But what value do you put on a trade? I can see arguments for going both ways. Set and forget with Grundy and Gawn, or one of them and a cheaper with a view to upgrading. However, for me, if I'd got it right at the start that's one less trade I would have needed throughout the year.
Right now I'm set on starting with Gawn and Grundy next year, but a lot can happen between now and then. If someone like Darcy kills it in the preseason then I might be tempted to go the cheaper option, but it's just another trade I need to use at a later date.
My best year ever was last year when I went with mid priced madness at the start and finished in the top 200. With the depth of the upcoming draft I reckon next year will be GNR with only true breakout candidates and injury discounted players worth considering. Right now Dunkley stands out as a breakout player. Priced in the mid 90's but averaged nearly 130 in his last five games.
I love having these conversations because everyone has different views. It would be pretty boring if we all thought the same wouldn't it? I'm already looking forward to next year.
Just looking at it and I reckon ill start with Hurn again next year.
Just adds so much needed sexiness to my team.
Expect something different from me next year campaignersExcept Hurn obviously
![]()
This will be debated for 6 months which is good.Back to Grundy / Gawn .....i guess these decisions will be influenced by who's available for the rest of our teams
I agree .....this is similar thinking to me ....however I'll look at the rest of the team, what value picks there are, and good available rookies, b4 making the call on Grundy / GawnThis will be debated for 6 months which is good.
Clearly they were steals at 503 & 534K with their output this season. But with their prices next year you'll want the 130 averages straight away to justify the outlay. One bad week and you'll save yourself 100K.
I wanted Danger from the start but wasn't going to fork out 749K. I picked him up for 150K less and he's tonned up 12 times since.
Locks for 2019:
Backs: Lloyd, Whitfield, Doch
Mids: Titch, Cripps, M Crouch/Zerrett at 100ave
Rucks: Gawn, Grundy
Fwds: Dusty, Danger (plz)
Will be watching Hannebery and Cockatoo closely over the pre season.
Bit early to be looking at non playing loophole options before the draw has even been released.![]()

http://supercoachtalk.com/the-motts-manoeuvre-luke-hodge/I agree ....that's what this forum is about ...yes there's the shit-stirring on gameday, but these debates are healthy, with no wrong answers
The debate i had pre-season, was do i start Robbie Gray R1 ..despite having a 1 week suspension ...now everyone said it was madness to start a suspended player (given he also had the bye)
But what cost a trade ? .......AND then how many Coaches held players like Fyfe, Kelly, Walters on their benches for multiple weeks ? ....what's the difference there, when i was only holding Gray for the 1 week
In hindsight i should have followed my gut and started Gray
2017 article .....you didn't think of giving me the link, just a touch earlier ?.....like B4 R1 ? ..
I'm not sure if we did one this year, might have.2017 article .....you didn't think of giving me the link, just a touch earlier ?.....like B4 R1 ? ..![]()
And yes could have / should have been replicated this year with GrayI'm not sure if we did one this year, might have.
Was a killer move in 2016 with Zorko though.
Duly noted.And yes could have / should have been replicated this year with Gray
Yeah, that's a good topic .....the other would be the current debate of starting 2 premium ruckmen Gawn / GrundyDuly noted.
Will do one with Gaff next year assuming he misses just the one![]()
I'm not sure if we did one this year, might have.
Was a killer move in 2016 with Zorko though.
