Not for mine. Both stay.
That was meant to be an "if". Both stay in mine until Rohan shows he's fit next week and one has a poor game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Not for mine. Both stay.
That was meant to be an "if". Both stay in mine until Rohan shows he's fit next week and one has a poor game.
surely Taylor forward
Not for mine. If Rohan comes in it has to be for a forward. Atkins or Miers.
Henderson on Riewoldt?
More I think about it the more I think that Fort would have been the better Hawkins replacement. Even though Henderson is the better player.
Just saw we have Nicholls as an umpire again, fu**!
Game is over before it even starts!
Henderson can handle the heat of finals. Fort is unknown. This is the right call IMO.
Yes.
Matchups?
Blicavs just has to go to Lynch I think. Harry really should be on Riewoldt but with Henderson coming in that looks his matchup? Rioli is there most dangerous small forward and often will go missing for the match if he starts badly - Stewart to him I reckon. Kolo or Bews to Castagna/Bolton etc. O'Connor to Lambert.
Just saw we have Nicholls as an umpire again, fu**!
Game is over before it even starts!
I oscillate. Henderson hasn't got a sterling finals record by any means. Tomorrow night he gets the opportunity to change that.
I think that the logical option was Henderson coming in Ray. I'm happy with that but the bigger question remains as to how the team is actually going to structure up...
More I think about it the more I think that Fort would have been the better Hawkins replacement. Even though Henderson is the better player.
All the umpires around are s**t, the names of them are irrelevant.. A s**t one out, another s**t one inYou're ******* joking.
How is that possible? He absolutely murdered us last week.
fu** me.
People see things differently, some take note of things that others may find irrelevant.Never ceases to amuse me people who think umpires in this day and age have real bias against certain teams. I’ve never even looked at who is umpiring a game once in my life that I can remember {nor cAn I remember ever leaving a game actually thinking that the umpires legitimately cost us the match)
He probably is - but he would at least give me hope - because he is lightning quick - and a very strong mark - if he clicked - he has got a high ceiling he has got alot of talent
Henderson - then is no boldness at all in bringing him - and in my opinion - the worse team you would want to bring him in against is Richmond because they are quick - that chaos ball over the back - where it is a sprint to the line - disaster
Just saw we have Nicholls as an umpire again, fu**!
Game is over before it even starts!
He was probably our best defender in the Brisbane game. In much better form than Fort and deserves his opportunity.
Hope you went with BetEasy @ 5.4-1 for $10... that's all I did so farBecause of this post I just put on a bet.
Gee, I hope you are right. That was my operation money.
Something about the whole Hendo thing leaves me cold