tomthabuddah1
Senior List
Not for me - Duncan uninjured has been really poor for a while now and specially when under pressure.Maybe- I'd consider replacing him for Duncan next week.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not for me - Duncan uninjured has been really poor for a while now and specially when under pressure.Maybe- I'd consider replacing him for Duncan next week.
26% of Cats posters here think Richmond will win by 40+ points? Seriously?
Those are mostly Tigers supporters votes. You can see the user names by clicking on the Votes: link26% of Cats posters here think Richmond will win by 40+ points? Seriously?
26% of Cats posters here think Richmond will win by 40+ points? Seriously?
This is really boring stuff. Offer the solution; don't just dismiss what they are putting forward by itself.Taylor forward fails much more than it works. Thought they gave up on it after the Dogs game this year.
Id be amazed if Henderson works forward.
It's ridiculous really. Gone from giving us a chance to thinking we're screwed.
I hope our players do not have the same attitude of many of our fans. We are one win away from a GF - this is a good moment.
I remember how excited I was in 2004, when we were back in the Prelim for the first time in years. One win from a Grand Final. We have become a pretty entitled supporter group.
Great minds think alike DW. Our jinx seemed to work well last week, hopefully it does again!I tipped Richmond basically to jinx them, Geelong have always won when I tip against them, although I didn't do the poll would rather just leave that.
This is really boring stuff. Offer the solution; don't just dismiss what they are putting forward by itself.
^ This I like. "This isn't ideal but there's not much we can do".I have to say I agree on the first two points.....Taylor forward does rarely work, and I too will be amazed if Hendo up forward works either.
That said, there's no obvious alternative, without 'reaching' just as desperately by selecting someone left field like Fort or Cocky. Which probably demonstrates that we're pushing the proverbial uphill.
You know, I know, we all know that Taylor or Henderson forward is not going to work.This is really boring stuff. Offer the solution; don't just dismiss what they are putting forward by itself.
So you've got nothing. Angry man yells at cloud. Cool.You know, I know, we all know that Taylor or Henderson forward is not going to work.
Since I'm not getting paid a million bucks a year with a whole bunch of assistants around me I would of hoped they could come up with a better solution without my help!
But personally would of played Fort. Seemed our "if Hawkins goes down, try this" idea earlier in the year. And it worked ok.
1-39pts.Are we really are $3.75 with Sportsbet?
Fort the least mobile man on an AFL list against their mobile defence. A 45 year old Taylor deals with ground balls five times as effectively and has three times the mobility. Combined with leadership and game nous. Throwing an incompetent rookie in as support for Sav in a prelim would outrank Blitz rucking the first final as a MC decision.You know, I know, we all know that Taylor or Henderson forward is not going to work.
Since I'm not getting paid a million bucks a year with a whole bunch of assistants around me I would of hoped they could come up with a better solution without my help!
But personally would of played Fort. Seemed our "if Hawkins goes down, try this" idea earlier in the year. And it worked ok.
1-39pts.
$3.12 for the win. Not bad odds if anyone’s confident!
Fort the least mobile man on an AFL list against their mobile defence. A 45 year old Taylor deals with ground balls five times as effectively and has three times the mobility. Combined with leadership and game nous. Throwing an incompetent rookie in as support for Sav in a prelim would outrank Blitz rucking the first final as a MC decision.
Yes, winning by a particular margin will always be higher odds than winning by any margin.I don't understand this betting thing.....
So it's $3.12 if we win...... But if we win by 1 - 39 points it's $3.75???
Are we really are $3.75 with Sportsbet?
Get on BetEasy and use the Double Earnings promotion on Tigers v Cats game... will get you $5.6-1 capped for $10 stake... better take those, even if its a tenner1-39pts.
$3.12 for the win. Not bad odds if anyone’s confident!
Yes, winning by a particular margin will always be higher odds than winning by any margin.
Get on BetEasy and use the Double Earnings promotion on Tigers v Cats game... will get you $5.6-1 capped for $10 stake... better take those, even if its a tenner
Why not? Do you see Taylor or Henderson doing a better job?So you've got nothing. Angry man yells at cloud. Cool.
Fort is not the answer.
Hendo is 4.2 times as mobile as Fort so I still see it as a net win in comparison to Taylor back, Fort forward. I'm going under the assumption that Stanley and Taylor will be forward more than Henderson, who surely plays back.How do you see Hendo coping with their mobile defence?