Plunk
Rookie
- Dec 17, 2018
- 38
- 66
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Probably going to run with this until JLT barring any injury
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Almost identical to my teamView attachment 598145
Probably going to run with this until JLT barring any injury
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Question marks over McLeans role with Libba back and Dunkley playing more mid. McLean May return to more time forward.Haven’t seen too many teams with McLean yet. Could be an interesting POD.
#Definitely one of the stronger teams posted so far
Greene the only question mark.
That and the lack of Barrass, tisk tisk.
Barrass is innocent.#
FreekickMaynard
Question marks over McLeans role with Libba back and Dunkley playing more mid. McLean May return to more time forward.
Terrific structure. That backline could be awesome. I like the Wingard selection as wellView attachment 598477
Quite like this team, 14 keepers + Libba whilst keeping a pretty solid structure.
Have a Merry Christmas campaigners.
No offence to you at all but i don't get this "structure" thing that get's bandied around here.Terrific structure. That backline could be awesome. I like the Wingard selection as well
Having a great family lunch and a few beers then eagle rock came on. I teleported back to my seat at the G, sitting there in disbelief.Barrass is innocent.
Innocent I tells ya
8 years ago.Having a great family lunch and a few beers then eagle rock came on. I teleported back to my seat at the G, sitting there in disbelief.
I now can't listen to this classic song again
Structure just means distribution of cash, balance of premos, rookies and midpricers on each line, number of premos/rookies on field etc. At this stage when we know SFA about availability of rookies, the team in question does have a solid structure. Setterfield at F5(for example) leaving only 1 rookie on field is great imo and what I'm doing, especially as fwd rookies often score the least historically.No offence to you at all but i don't get this "structure" thing that get's bandied around here.
If we have rookies a plenty in the backs but bugger all in the fwds, what's wrong with going 2-0-4 & 4-0-2 for example?
It's not a real team, it's about maximising bang for bucks. Which is always important.
Yes exactly, we don't know the rookies, so saying it's a balanced side now is just a word.Structure just means distribution of cash, balance of premos, rookies and midpricers on each line, number of premos/rookies on field etc. At this stage when we know SFA about availability of rookies, the team in question does have a solid structure. Setterfield at F5(for example) leaving only 1 rookie on field is great imo and what I'm doing, especially as fwd rookies often score the least historically.
When we know more about rookies, then the structure you mentioned may well be feasible. But unlikely that there will be enough dependable back rookies to have 4 on field.
I feel for you broHaving a great family lunch and a few beers then eagle rock came on. I teleported back to my seat at the G, sitting there in disbelief.
I now can't listen to this classic song again
You know what else is a word...Yes exactly, we don't know the rookies, so saying it's a balanced side now is just a word.