dogs105
Sweet Kennels Proprietor
Where will Hartley go?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Us?Where will Hartley go?
Sounds like he must have something lined up given Essendon had a contract on the table. Not the worst KPD going around by a long stretch...
Hartley seeks opportunities elsewhere
Michael Hartley's time in the red and black comes to an end.www.essendonfc.com.au
Didn't think it would take someone too long to give old Kyle a mention....hahaMassive upgrade on Hartigan.
And dmac.Massive upgrade on Hartigan.
In the NBA they get fines, at the AFC they got offended.
Campo is harder to judge, some players really rate him. I think as the group was set for a huge change it was clear he wasn't equipped for it. Had a lot of credits after 2015 but burnt them all and then some.
The players aren’t stupid. Imagine continually getting towelled up in the middle, and being instructed to continually back yourself in and follow the same plan.Will not be naming names, but apparently he was a big problem with the players. This actually surprised me, as I had always thought he was well liked by the playing group.
From what I'd been told it had become Fagan vs Roo/Chapman on the review. Fagan was pushing for it, Roo/Chapman kept telling him it wasn't needed, Burton and Campo were great, then Roo put his foot in his mouth with the "go support someone else" comment and so Roo/Chapman called the review as damage control, but limited the scope not to include the board (which Fagan wanted)I don't think Burton was ever safe, the real talk started mid year. Fagan really pushed for the review, he was obviously listening to the groundswell.
Campo is harder to judge, some players really rate him. I think as the group was set for a huge change it was clear he wasn't equipped for it. Had a lot of credits after 2015 but burnt them all and then some.
Liked by some of the older senior core, but not as much outside that.Will not be naming names, but apparently he was a big problem with the players. This actually surprised me, as I had always thought he was well liked by the playing group.
From what I'd been told it had become Fagan vs Roo/Chapman on the review. Fagan was pushing for it, Roo/Chapman kept telling him it wasn't needed, Burton and Campo were great, then Roo put his foot in his mouth with the "go support someone else" comment and so Roo/Chapman called the review as damage control, but limited the scope not to include the board (which Fagan wanted)
Liked by some of the older senior core, but not as much outside that.
"statistics...no " ' " requiredThis is one of those cases when statistic's really stings!
I don't think it's all the senior players, but he had an older group like the Douglas/Thommo/Danger types who loved him.Interestingly, this info came from a senior player.
Maybe playing favourites? It would probably be hard not to when you've been at the club for a decade.
From what I heard, Brett was surprised (probably all that public support he was receiving from Chapman), and is pretty unhappy that he is the scapegoat when there are others still there who perhaps shouldn't be.From what I'd been told it had become Fagan vs Roo/Chapman on the review. Fagan was pushing for it, Roo/Chapman kept telling him it wasn't needed, Burton and Campo were great, then Roo put his foot in his mouth with the "go support someone else" comment and so Roo/Chapman called the review as damage control, but limited the scope not to include the board (which Fagan wanted)
Liked by some of the older senior core, but not as much outside that.
I believe that. Fagan is an outsider and not stupid, I believe he’s eventually seen through the Boys Club culture and wants to change it.From what I'd been told it had become Fagan vs Roo/Chapman on the review. Fagan was pushing for it, Roo/Chapman kept telling him it wasn't needed, Burton and Campo were great, then Roo put his foot in his mouth with the "go support someone else" comment and so Roo/Chapman called the review as damage control, but limited the scope not to include the board (which Fagan wanted)
Liked by some of the older senior core, but not as much outside that.
From what I heard, Brett was surprised (probably all that public support he was receiving from Chapman), and is pretty unhappy that he is the scapegoat when there are others still there who perhaps shouldn't be.
I'm not sure who they are though
The group he was well liked by was diminishing by the dayWill not be naming names, but apparently he was a big problem with the players. This actually surprised me, as I had always thought he was well liked by the playing group.
From what I'd been told it had become Fagan vs Roo/Chapman on the review. Fagan was pushing for it, Roo/Chapman kept telling him it wasn't needed, Burton and Campo were great, then Roo put his foot in his mouth with the "go support someone else" comment and so Roo/Chapman called the review as damage control, but limited the scope not to include the board (which Fagan wanted)
Roo was not responding to questions about the review but in general about the clubs leaders making decisions, that could have meant them keeping certain members.No that's not right, Fagan didn't think we needed the review and had ideas on what he wanted to change, took those ideas to the board, the board said they want a full review before implementing what Fagan wanted to do.
"go support someone else" was Roos hypothetical response to people who would not accept the findings of the review so it definitely wasn't what caused the review.
3 announcements to support nicks not far away.
Godden looks likely to be named senior assistant.
Well we know it wasn’t DmacInterestingly, this info came from a senior player.
Maybe playing favourites? It would probably be hard not to when you've been at the club for a decade.