- Oct 16, 2015
- 24,279
- 30,558
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Other way aroundStephens at 7, Kemp at 10.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Other way aroundStephens at 7, Kemp at 10.
Possibility, would be fine by me.Other way around
Maybe, I'd try 28 first.We'd need to give something like 23 back obviously
Chad Cornes...But but but Rowey said he was a lock......
I think they'll get someone, who that is o have no idea. Glenelg were quite concerned Stone was going early days though.
My guess would be Nicks might want someone he's had a relationship within football before.
That won't be happeningThey should get him on Footy Classified to explain his side of the story. Would be a good laugh I reckon.
Who told you they want Flanders?They want 4 specifically for Flanders so would unlikely trade for pick 10. He will be long gone by then according to the phantom drafts.
He just has faith I think.Who told you they want Flanders?
I'd be very happy with Kemp and McAseyReckon if we get 7 and 10 it's McAsey we have our eye on at 10
I'd be stoked with that.Reckon if we get 7 and 10 it's McAsey we have our eye on at 10
Understand & support trading #4 for two x first roundHeard through my source that Crows looking to trade pick 4 for picks 7 and 10 (Freo) or with Geelong (14 amd 17 along with something else)...
Shiver me timbers....
Understand & support trading #4 for two x first round
But why would Freo do that deal ....makes no sense ...they want Henry and maybe Jackson ? ...Understand that scenario if Henry gets a bid by Crows or Syd ....but is that realistic ?
Could see
Freo #7 & #10 to the Crows for #4
Crows #7 to Geel for #14 & #17
Crows give #17 to Freo
Summary
Crows #4 becomes #10 & #14
Geel #14 & #17 becomes #7
Freo #7 & #10 becomes #4 and #17
Good for Adel & Geel .....not sure still the benefit to Freo
But Freo would want both ....so they're better to keep both picks IMOUnlikely Freo would entertain trading 7 or 10 until a bid for Henry comes in.
Only exception may be they are targeting Jackson and think he may be taken by Sydney at 5.
On iPad using BigFooty.com mobile app
I can categorically tell you he was committed to the Crows before they demoted him by appointing Burton, and that he doesn't have a lot of time for the administration who did it.Poulos leaving the Crows was not the cause of the Hamstrings and soft tissue issues. what effected them was Burton meddling in the medical side and eqaully important his failure to get somone who understood how the Kangatech and NordBoard technoglies worked.
Re Poulos the question that is disputed is did he have a top job with international exposure, line up up before or after leaving the Crows.
Re Poulas To be honest I heard that many differant stories from poeple who all mention they are in the know I will stick to the middle ground on this one.I can categorically tell you he was committed to the Crows before they demoted him by appointing Burton, and that he doesn't have a lot of time for the administration who did it.
I reached out to Nick last year in an effort to get him on the podcast. We shared a bit over DMs but he didn't want to come on, for obvious reasons. I'm comfortable that he was being genuine, he was with the 7's by then.Re Poulas To be honest I heard that many differant stories from poeple who all mention they are in the know I will stick to the middle ground on this one.
But one I am lead to believe is the Postion Burton took was differant to the one Pouplos had the previous year, they combined the the Fitness and Medical dept under one person pervious to that they had 2 seperate departments.
My view is The idea was sound, but the wrong person was selected to lead,
I reckon if he was coming we would have announced it quite quickly, reckon there will be no further changes or additions until next year.
I think I'd rather trade 4 for 6 and GWS 2020/1Understand & support trading #4 for two x first round
But why would Freo do that deal ....makes no sense ...they want Henry and maybe Jackson ? ...Understand that scenario if Henry gets a bid by Crows or Syd ....but is that realistic ?
Could see
Freo #7 & #10 to the Crows for #4
Crows #7 to Geel for #14 & #17
Crows give #17 to Freo
Summary
Crows #4 becomes #10 & #14
Geel #14 & #17 becomes #7
Freo #7 & #10 becomes #4 and #17
Good for Adel & Geel .....not sure still the benefit to Freo
We paid 19 and 8 for 4.Understand & support trading #4 for two x first round
But why would Freo do that deal ....makes no sense ...they want Henry and maybe Jackson ? ...Understand that scenario if Henry gets a bid by Crows or Syd ....but is that realistic ?
Could see
Freo #7 & #10 to the Crows for #4
Crows #7 to Geel for #14 & #17
Crows give #17 to Freo
Summary
Crows #4 becomes #10 & #14
Geel #14 & #17 becomes #7
Freo #7 & #10 becomes #4 and #17
Good for Adel & Geel .....not sure still the benefit to Freo
We paid 19 and 8 for 4.
Giving it up for 10 and 14 seems cheap?
Surely we'd be looking to bring 23 in closer to a first or get 10 lower?
I think it makes pretty obvious sense why they'd do it.Understand & support trading #4 for two x first round
But why would Freo do that deal ....makes no sense ...they want Henry and maybe Jackson ? ...Understand that scenario if Henry gets a bid by Crows or Syd ....but is that realistic ?
Could see
Freo #7 & #10 to the Crows for #4
Crows #7 to Geel for #14 & #17
Crows give #17 to Freo
Summary
Crows #4 becomes #10 & #14
Geel #14 & #17 becomes #7
Freo #7 & #10 becomes #4 and #17
Good for Adel & Geel .....not sure still the benefit to Freo