Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They will do their review and have a process in place like they do on all companies, just adapt it to suit the industry and company and compare with the other clubs as that is the only comparison they can draw upon. They will compare with the Wsst Coast and Hawks and also GC and Melbourne and find a happy medium Im sure
The biggest item they will look at is historical results as you cant review a company unless you can see its results, not projections
What do you think they will find from results, with on and off field as they will do both
Not at all accountants analyse results and facts, also how those results are obtained , that's how Ive found both deloittes and KPMG never had much to do with Earnst and Yong apart from answering some audit questions for them
So financially the club is strong, and membership wise it is strong, compared to the other teams
On Field our results are middle of the road
They are very fact driven, they don't draw upon opinions to often
How do you think the review will look based on the results we show?
I think the review will show off field the club knows clearly what its doing and onfield we are middle of the road with room for improvement, based on results purely
Of course it is. Marty doesn't understand.I thought this was more than a financial review?
I know who doesn't understandOf course it is. Marty doesn't understand.
Sounds like a variation of the he is leaving rumour.So I hear the club has told Brad Crouch to explore his options.
Surely not!!
Will they interview players about personalities at the club or is it processes and structures.
Or burton might be doing everything by the book but if everyone hates him because he’s a dick, is he going to be recommend to be moved on?
Chapman's Managing Director, and Director Con Tragakis both used to work for KPMG.....
Our team
Five key business partners - Rob Chapman, Jennifer Ma, Jim Hazel, Con Tragakis, Bruce Carterchapmancp.com.au
Why do you persist with this idea that an organisational review by a firm like KPMG (or E&Y, or PwC) is some sort of variation on a financial audit? It has been discussed enough on this board, and in particular the nature of these firms and the work they do, that it should be clear by now.
Actual results - financial or on-field - are peripheral to such a review. A club commissions such a review BECAUSE their results have not been satisfactory, they don't do it because they want someone to look at their results and benchmark them. OK, that sort of thing might get a mention, but it will be peripheral in the sense that they will be mentioned as the backdrop to the review and the basis for recommendations eg:
"Recommendation 1: Sack Brett Burton. This will address the issues raised by stakeholders (refer Section 4.5 of the report) and improve the club's ability to achieve its stated goal, listed in the Terms of Reference under 2.3.1: Win Premierships."
It is not an audit. The people conducting the review will not be auditors. Benchmarks, facts and figures - financial or on-field - will be mentioned, of course, but they will be peripheral.
Rucci saying KPMG may be doing the review.
You really shouldn't talk about yourself in the third person
Um, that's not the point. It's got nothing to do with Rucci/KPMG - it could be PwC, E&Y, Deloitte - doesn't matter. What you've been talking all along about a review by such a firm being some sort of glorified audit focused on analysis of results by accountants. Because you don't understand the nature of such a review or the firms that conduct them. You were saying this before the Rucci rumour was posted.I didn't persist with anything it was a rumour by Rucci that KPMG would be used that was posted
Have a go at Rucci not me
Butts is the one to take over from Keath or Talia by the time they are 30. But we need another young KPD.But you are thinking too short term there mate.
We need to think about the 2021 / 2022 seasons. Keath will be 30 by then and anything but dynamic!! Hartigan needs to go too, or become SANFL backup.
I feel the same about Greenwood. He only has a couple of years in him ... Better to trade that out and get young talent into his role ASAP ... And I love what Hugh brings in terms of point of difference.
It's the same reason why, even though he is close to my favourite AFC footballer, the idea of Brad Crouch seeking better opportunities might be what is best for the team. Trade him out now while he has good value - after a year of no injuries, because our next two years are about rebuilding the club.
I can't see how we fit Sloane and Mrouch and Brouch into our midfield if we expect to improve.
It's gotta be a harsh transition. As Clarkson said ... Catastrophic change!
Sent using Tapatalk App on Android.
They will have a Human resource consultant or one already on there books, who would be looking at the employee/employer relationship/interactions in a football sense it would Player to coach, Player to management, Coach to management Coach to Board. Board to players etc.Will they interview players about personalities at the club or is it processes and structures.
Or burton might be doing everything by the book but if everyone hates him because he’s a dick, is he going to be recommend to be moved on?
Um, that's not the point. It's got nothing to do with Rucci/KPMG - it could be PwC, E&Y, Deloitte - doesn't matter. What you've been talking all along about a review by such a firm being some sort of glorified audit focused on analysis of results by accountants. Because you don't understand the nature of such a review or the firms that conduct them. You were saying this before the Rucci rumour was posted.
Ain't that the truth. We suffer from SA GREAT attitude still ... where only people living in SA think SA is great.Butts is the one to take over from Keath or Talia by the time they are 30. But we need another young KPD.
I am not adverse to trading out BCrouch. But it should be for something decent.
Personally think you add some midfield class to the Crouchs and Sloane you have a fairly decent midfield.
But since there is no SA player that fits that profile we will never be able to trade one in.
a 4th rounder for 45 goal a year player for 4+ years?Im sorry to say this JJ will never attract a 2nd regardless if we pay his whole salary, fourth rounder for an SANFL player
Surely the $1.2m we suppsedly have for Grundy would make SA Great for Cognelio or Whitfield?Ain't that the truth. We suffer from SA GREAT attitude still ... where only people living in SA think SA is great.
You confused me by answering about a financial review.No one knows, but I doubt they would be caling for a financial review alone, for a club succeeding in that area, you would think its an entire club review covering everything including financial as the may cross over into saying we should spend more money, but if the finances dont allow it, that wont be recommended
a 4th rounder for 45 goal a year player for 4+ years?
You confused me by answering about a financial review.
Well I obviously wasn’t part of that review hence why I asked what they would do.It will be the same type of review as Earnst and young did for richmond obviously
No way would I do that deal unless we get a much better pick than he's worth. 1st or 2nd rounder.Heard from a solid source that Jenkins to Geelong (who clearly don't have a salary cap) is a done deal. We will also be paying $250k of his salary to move him.
Not sure if we are getting anything back or just getting him out, but that's the deal.
Was talked about by Crows players over the weekend.