Persevering Saint
Brownlow Medallist
Well, I for one am shocked - SHOCKED - at the suggestion that players like Stevie Lawrence may have partaken of recreational drugs. I've always assumed they were as pure as the sniffen' blow.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Because controversy brings ratings.Completely understandable, but why bring it up now? I understand GT is honest, it was the way he talked about it that upset the majority
The only reason Stevie Lawrence got sacked was because he wasn't Fraser Gehrig.Well, I for one am shocked - SHOCKED - at the suggestion that players like Stevie Lawrence may have partaken of recreational drugs. I've always assumed they were as pure as the sniffen' blow.
And was Mike Sheahan's son expelled from school as a 12 year old for dealing drugs?I think it lacked class to resond specifically about St. Kilda leading into a pretty damn important preseason.
He could easily have deflected the question, but seems desperate to hold on to his media "presence".
BUT I think naming names would be even more shameful, especially if he was told this information and didn't see it himself. Putting names out there has pretty big implications for their families, jobs, friends. I'd rather hear of rumour and innuendo than have names put out there either during or post career.
Those saying drug use should be talked about and not swept under the carpet. Yeah, I agree but not by media parasites like Mike Sheahan looking for headlines to stay relevant. There's a way to discuss these things without simply trying to profit from them at the expense of others.
Finally, about being tarnished by the same brush and having to prove innocence. I think that's hogwash, and it's precious. It's like that Gilette ad suggesting men sort their s**t out. Lots of guys said they didn't want to be put in the same group as murderers, rapists e.t.c. I think that's pretty damn precious, because the problem is there and we are in the same group. The drug problem is there (whether Thomas said it or not), and those players WERE in the same group/team, and I call BS that they didn't know anything about it. Dal and co could be a bit less worried about their own image and a bit more honest and concerned for the welfare of players that are taking drugs, especially a lot of drugs.
Remember the first three you mentioned were too drunk for Bangkok?lawrence, hamil, gehrig, baker definitely (have friends that used to party with him), gram (name says it all.. ), saw monty out a few times when he was younger pretty off his face, maguire too, peckett was definitely no angel can confirm, etc.. but the thing is, who cares? I care if it's affecting their performance, or they do it in a public manner and the club loses sponsorship $$, but if not it's none of my business.
Yeah Nah.
I'd say the ratio between mental health sufferers turning to drugs compared with people using mental health as an excuse to not get caught is about 186,653 to 1
The co-morbidity between drug use and mental health issues is confirmed by anecdotal evidence and a mountain of scientifically validated research. Whether it is a chicken or egg argument is a moot point.
Whether people start taking drugs to mask pain, or create problems through drug taking isn't the point. In either instance, the person is ill and needs help and treatment, not condemnation. Pop into any one of our prisons and you'll see the physical, mental and psychological carnage caused by the "War on Drugs".
We've tried punishment, exposure and shaming. It hasn't worked for decades, so why do we as a society persist? As for GT, he needs to stay relevant. I think I'll rename him Sandra Sully.
zThe co-morbidity between drug use and mental health issues is confirmed by anecdotal evidence and a mountain of scientifically validated research. Whether it is a chicken or egg argument is a moot point.
Whether people start taking drugs to mask pain, or create problems through drug taking isn't the point. In either instance, the person is ill and needs help and treatment, not condemnation. Pop into any one of our prisons and you'll see the physical, mental and psychological carnage caused by the "War on Drugs".
We've tried punishment, exposure and shaming. It hasn't worked for decades, so why do we as a society persist? As for GT, he needs to stay relevant. I think I'll rename him Sandra Sully.
I wouldn’t go that far....he may have just been kicking to the hot spot....he kicked it before the forward led - at least it wasn’t on top of the forwards head though - chance or design the question....DID WE JUST KICK TO A PLAYER AND NOT BOMB?? OMG OMG OMG OMG.
exactly there is no point to bringing it up now ... it serves no point except to pump up the profile of Grant Thomas ....Completely understandable, but why bring it up now? I understand GT is honest, it was the way he talked about it that upset the majority
well lets just look at the midfield ... who would you rather get instruction from a 2x all australian, premiership player who captaines an AFL clum and won three b&f's in his playing days ,who coached an AFL tean and was an assistant in 3 flag winning teams ..... of a bloke who happened to coach a stacked Claremont WAFL team to a flag ....Well we left it to the assistants last preseason and we saw how great that was.
The old head coach does everything model is long gone...
The co-morbidity between drug use and mental health issues is confirmed by anecdotal evidence and a mountain of scientifically validated research. Whether it is a chicken or egg argument is a moot point.
Whether people start taking drugs to mask pain, or create problems through drug taking isn't the point. In either instance, the person is ill and needs help and treatment, not condemnation. Pop into any one of our prisons and you'll see the physical, mental and psychological carnage caused by the "War on Drugs".
We've tried punishment, exposure and shaming. It hasn't worked for decades, so why do we as a society persist? As for GT, he needs to stay relevant. I think I'll rename him Sandra Sully.
GTs drug of choice has always been the almighty dollar.exactly there is no point to bringing it up now ... it serves no point except to pump up the profile of Grant Thomas ....
i could tell you the drugs i tried as a kid but that doesnt tell you the person i became all it says is on one specific day i made a choice to do something i prob shouldnt have ... i reckon in GT's life there are moments like that yet i dont think his "honesty" would make him disclose them ...
Some of the older Saints women on Facebook were talking about Thomas at the Saints Disco and reckons he should hold his council.exactly there is no point to bringing it up now ... it serves no point except to pump up the profile of Grant Thomas ....
i could tell you the drugs i tried as a kid but that doesnt tell you the person i became all it says is on one specific day i made a choice to do something i prob shouldnt have ... i reckon in GT's life there are moments like that yet i dont think his "honesty" would make him disclose them ...
I really don't think much about Thommo …..he seems to come out with a controversial opinion on everything.....it gets tiresome after a while.By all means say that drug taking is a concern throughout the competition, and take the AFL to task for its drug policy, but why come out and say explicitly that it was rife at the Saints?
exactly there is no point to bringing it up now ... it serves no point except to pump up the profile of Grant Thomas ....
i could tell you the drugs i tried as a kid but that doesnt tell you the person i became all it says is on one specific day i made a choice to do something i prob shouldnt have ... i reckon in GT's life there are moments like that yet i dont think his "honesty" would make him disclose them ...
Why St Kilda's leadership decision stunned the Swans
Feb 21, 2019 3:20PM
Damian Barrett has questioned Dan Hannebery's leadership credentials
SYDNEY officials "nearly fell off their chairs" on learning of Dan Hannebery's appointment to St Kilda's leadership group, AFL.com.au chief football correspondent Damian Barrett has revealed.
Hannebery, who moved from the Swans to the Saints on a lucrative five-year deal, was elected to the Saints' five-man leadership group last week.
While Hannebery has committed himself at training, Barrett said the 27-year-old had reportedly failed to rein in his heavy social schedule.
BARRETT: Can Hannebery live up to his price tag - and pressure?
"He's certainly said to have a good off-season. He's got up to a bit of socialising in the off-season," Barrett said on The Sounding Board podcast.
"It is an issue because of what they've invested in him and the fact that no other club, when it came to the crunch in Trade Period last year, actually went for him.
"I think it's a questionable decision (to recruit Hannebery) right now".
This Damian Barrett character will do anything to get a headline - how can the media just downright slander someone
And if i remember correctly, he did try it on the players.I remember Thommo got in some Russian quack who wanted him to do enemas and eat string or some s**t. He was going to try it on the playing group. I'm pretty sure he'd look back at that and realise he was probably a bit heavy on his own drug use at the time.
Wouldn't really bother entertaining these people's opinions.
So according to this muppet - Sydney officials, a club where Dan Hannebery was a vice captain for years, nearly fell off their chairs because Hannebery, who is now the most experienced and decorated player on our list, was appointed to our leadership group.Why St Kilda's leadership decision stunned the Swans
Feb 21, 2019 3:20PM
Damian Barrett has questioned Dan Hannebery's leadership credentials
SYDNEY officials "nearly fell off their chairs" on learning of Dan Hannebery's appointment to St Kilda's leadership group, AFL.com.au chief football correspondent Damian Barrett has revealed.
Hannebery, who moved from the Swans to the Saints on a lucrative five-year deal, was elected to the Saints' five-man leadership group last week.
While Hannebery has committed himself at training, Barrett said the 27-year-old had reportedly failed to rein in his heavy social schedule.
BARRETT: Can Hannebery live up to his price tag - and pressure?
"He's certainly said to have a good off-season. He's got up to a bit of socialising in the off-season," Barrett said on The Sounding Board podcast.
"It is an issue because of what they've invested in him and the fact that no other club, when it came to the crunch in Trade Period last year, actually went for him.
"I think it's a questionable decision (to recruit Hannebery) right now".
This Damian Barrett character will do anything to get a headline - how can the media just downright slander someone