Caller points out media hypocrisy r.e Tim Kelly choosing a club compared to Dangerfield selecting a club.
Four eyes Barrett immediately shuts it down as a conspiracy.
Enough said.
what did he say exactly?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Caller points out media hypocrisy r.e Tim Kelly choosing a club compared to Dangerfield selecting a club.
Four eyes Barrett immediately shuts it down as a conspiracy.
Enough said.
Haze surprisingly goes in to bat for Eagles more than one would think
This was posted in the other thread that is also dedicated to Tim Kelly hypotheticalsView attachment 757112
possible pick swap proposed on trade radio in order to get the pick(s) for Kelly.Thoughts?
Geelong dont have pick 69 its 73 .View attachment 757112
possible pick swap proposed on trade radio in order to get the pick(s) for Kelly.Thoughts?
Geelong dont have pick 69 its 73 .
That trade helps out carlton more than us
69 or 73 are usless picks we do not need . This year around the team with the lower picks have the power .
I still think we can get kelly + future 2nd
for 14 + future 1st .
Works out about pick 5
I proposed a different trade on the other board where we get 9 41 and 46 .Turn 69/73 or whatever it is into a future fourth. We’re not going to be picking that late in this year’s draft anyway. There’s a chance we only take two live picks and upgrade Watson.