Saintos The ITK
Premium Platinum
Keith and Bruce sound like two old derros down the early openers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zak Jones will get to the Saints and had a medical yesterday, according to Sam Landsberger and Tom Browne.
Brucey is worth between 8-14.
And I have spoken.
Hmm, this smells like posturing for better money at the Crows. Unlikely to come.Brad Crouch
“He’s gone to the Crows and his management has started talks on a five-year deal. He wants a long-term deal beyond his contract for 2020, but his management is also at the same time is still shopping him around to teams like Gold Coast and St Kilda.”
- Mitch Cleary
Yeah sounds like he's just pushing for a better contract.Brad Crouch
“He’s gone to the Crows and his management has started talks on a five-year deal. He wants a long-term deal beyond his contract for 2020, but his management is also at the same time is still shopping him around to teams like Gold Coast and St Kilda.”
- Mitch Cleary
Especially in a draft year that is supposedly pretty shallow.Brucey is worth between 8-14.
And I have spoken.
For The Record Maybe
Maybe, but all three of those players are miles better than Newnes in my opinion. If we get a 2nd rounder for Newnes the club should buy a lotto ticket.
But the quality of the contract probably does.Free agency comps had very little to do with the quality of the player.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why are people put off by Jenkins? Not a contested forward sure, but runs really well and kicks bags. If he is the 3rd tall in a team with 2 of Marshall, Membrey and Max then I think he'd be fine. Late-ish pick and we take on his salary after freeing up space by giving Steven away.
Plays for 2 years in the seniors, gets 1 more after that on the list as depth behind the King boys.
I'd much prefer to keep Bruce but Jenkins would be fine as a stop gap for a few years.
Parker?
Fake tan revolutionFor The Record Maybe
I can’t see us getting any of pick 12 from the dogs for Bruce . They do have pick 30 and 48 which equals in the points system around pick 20, and it think that’s about right.
Then pick 30= Jones
If we were to get 30 and 41 for Bruce
30 would be enough to get Jones i think
Would 41 be enough to get Keath? Maybe a bit short.
I'd be happy with that deal if it got us those two and if the plan is to play Battle forward
If we get Keath, it will offset Bruce since we can move Battle forward.
I can’t see us getting any of pick 12 from the dogs for Bruce . They do have pick 30 and 48 which equals in the points system around pick 20, and it think that’s about right.
Then pick 30= Jones
Bruce is no where near as good as HoganI want Jones but not to sell Bruce for him. We will have to give up 2 firsts to replace him with King. He's not much off Hogan who got heaps and a top 10 goal kicker in the AFL in a side with the second worst midfield in the AFL and maybe ever. Sydney want a first round pick for him anyway. He'll cost a pick around 19 to 25 INO. Best chance would be a future second with them hoping we finish second last. Keath would want a second apparently too.
Bruce is no where near as good as Hogan
Sydney might want a first for Jones but they won't get it
Not sure what Keath would cost, but as I said, if we got both for Bruce it's a good deal. If not then we don't do it.