Plus Answerth is the same age as that cohort and we picked Noah up a year later so to nab those four(Rayner, Bailey, Starc and Answerth) from what is considered a relatively weak draft class is a huge win for the clubIn what many are retrospectively calling a weak draft I am thrilled with the three we picked up.
Wonder if Hannebery year is wrongAlso relevant:
Lol there are Richmond posters saying they don't rate Neale, he accumulates but doesn't much impact the game. Doesn't need a tag.Also relevant:
They are quite clearly different types of players.Lol there are Richmond posters saying they don't rate Neale, he accumulates but doesn't much impact the game. Doesn't need a tag.
Just on goal kicking Neale is ahead of their beloved dusty. - Dusty has 10.3 the season, Neale 10.9.
Some of those Richmond supports really know their footy clearly.
Taking a break from sudokuVotes from Friday night:
Lachie Neale (BL)
Charlie Cameron (BL)
Alex Witherden (BL)
Noah Answerth (BL)
Dayne Zorko (BL)
Andrew McGrath (ESS)
Jarrod Berry (BL)
That would mean Fages gave Witherden 1 point.Taking a break from sudoku
LN 5, 5
CC 3, 3
AW 4, 1
NA 4, 0
DZ 2, 0
A Mc 2, 0
cant see any other way they could be distributed. But for the life of me I can’t understand how Noah got 4 and zero. Only explanation is Fages gave him four for blanketing AMT and Essendon didn’t rate the effort.
Fair enough, but that would mean Fages rated blanketing AMT lower than most BigFooty voters. He would Have rated Berry higher? By the bye I gave both Noah and Jarrod votes.That would mean Fages gave Witherden 1 point.
I could see Essendon giving Answerth 4 points for blanketing AMT.
I'm on the other side, I reckon Answerth got 4 from Fages. Mitch Robbo was saying that Noah got so much praise from everyone in the rooms after the game. Witho was good, but Noah was great at shutting down one of the most damaging guys on the field, as well as finding the footy and being effective with it. I think Noah's role was harder and he had as close to a perfect game as we could've asked for from him.Fair enough, but that would mean Fages rated blanketing AMT lower than most BigFooty voters. He would Have rated Berry higher? By the bye I gave both Noah and Jarrod votes.
and thanks for posting these votes. Nice mix of maths/footy understanding puzzle.