I think Henry suffers from not enough highlight videos on you tubeFor what it’s worth I rate Henry ......he is as dynamic as Holland’s imo .

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I think Henry suffers from not enough highlight videos on you tubeFor what it’s worth I rate Henry ......he is as dynamic as Holland’s imo .

He is a mid-sized forward but also plays back. Based on last year some watchers had him as capable of the wing. Got some physical presence so maybe a mid but without games you would only be guessing at that potential.I s that the bro of the Geelong Henry?
So he's a Mid too? had some notion he was a KPP.
Is he, quick who breaks the lines & is elite on both sides of his body?
For what it’s worth I rate Henry ......he is as dynamic as Holland’s imo .
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Won’t the Swans need to trade their first rounder to get a look at Daniher?1 ugle hagan wbd
2 sa kid, forget his name adel
3 wa kid, mcdonald north
4 phillips Sydney
5 Campbell sydney
6 Hollands Hawthorn
Actually so angry that Sydney get two bites of the cherry
Edit: hold up, geelong are doing a 2019 west coast
Swans would have won today if Clarko didn't piss off Papley. He's deliberately missed. 5 times.Won’t the Swans need to trade their first rounder to get a look at Daniher?
Won’t the Swans need to trade their first rounder to get a look at Daniher?
Fair enough didn’t realise he was a free agent, get ready to see another 10yr contract.I guess, if * match a FA bid
The more I think about it, the more I'm comfortable with the fact that the player we're interested in drafting will be available at our pick 4.
Or we're of the view that we'd be happy with either of the top 5-6.
Hence we weren't too fussed with dropping from pick 3 to 4 today.
as long as we don’t draft DGB with the 4th pick
Spot on , his a 3rd man up which we have plenty of. Use it on will Phillips apparently his got some speed so sounds good.Agree.
This is purely based on the highlights footage, but he just seems like a 3rd tall rather than a pure KPP. We don't need that type of player. We're screaming out for speedy midfielders and KPP.
Splitting pick for for 2 picks between 10 and 15 could be a possibility.
Sad timesI've conceded it'll be Bruhn or Phillips. We'll now miss on the absolute cream. We need to look at the next tier. O'Driscoll may even be a bolter.
I've conceded it'll be Bruhn or Phillips. We'll now miss on the absolute cream. We need to look at the next tier. O'Driscoll may even be a bolter.
We were pretty much shit for no reason, waste of a season.That'll be tough to swallow given we've had to put up with a season of sh*te.
What is wrong with picking Bruhn with pick 4 if he's selected? We need more midfield depth.
Complete different situation, that is a poor takeImagine this is 2004 and the people up set about winning wished we got got that lucrative pick 3 instead of 5, no Franklin for us.
On SM-G955F using BigFooty.com mobile app