HAWKSBESTEVA
Club Legend
- Jun 14, 2020
- 2,095
- 3,700
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Banned
- #3,801
If crows want a mid to replace [PLAYERCARD]brad crouch[/PLAYERCARD] then they would take Phillips at 1 over Holland’s
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

We can't lose.Thanks for that info. Welcome to Hawthorn Elijah Hollands or Will Phillips.
Just my opinion Brant but Hagdorn used to act like he wanted to be a big Victorian reporter who just sprouted shite.Hagdorn is either pretty good or pretty bad - I forget. Vlahos as really good.
Doesn't mean that this particular bit of info is correct of course, but the WA guys generally aren't crazy like your Tom Browne types.
AFL clubs are not that loose with drafting info. If true and we were desperate for DGB we could trade up to pick 2.Thought you guys might be interested to know about this
though I can't vouch for how reliable Hagdorn is.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I mean it’s pretty likely DGB isn’t going top 2 and swans have pick 3 so they’ll probably have first dibs on him anywayJust my opinion Brant but Hagdorn used to act like he wanted to be a big Victorian reporter who just sprouted sh*te.
As time went on he became a little more reliable & doesn’t get much wrong nowadays.
My issue with his comment though is why would Syd let everyone know who they plan on picking with their 1st pick ?
Vlahos is a good reliable reporter who doesn’t chase the headline story
Bruhn for me , Henry is a massive reach at 4If none of DGB, MacDonald and Hollands are available on d like to take bruhn of Henry. We need class and xfactor.
If none of DGB, MacDonald and Hollands are available on d like to take bruhn of Henry. We need class and xfactor.
Yeah that’s why we were pretty much last for contested and clearances.... we don’t bat deep enough there.The only thing we don't need is inside mids
Yeah that’s why we were pretty much last for contested and clearances.... we don’t bat deep enough there.
On paper it’s good but in practice, not so good. I think Phillips will be a superstar, he can play inside and outside. Adding Phillips to worpel and Mitchel is something I’d want to do.Mitchell, Worpel and JOM with Maginess, Jones and Cousins in reserve is more than enough. Those first three should be good enough, we sure pay them as if they are.
On paper it’s good but in practice, not so good. I think Phillips will be a superstar, he can play inside and outside. Adding Phillips to worpel and Mitchel is something I’d want to do.
Unfortunately I don’t think JOM will ever be the player we thought he’d be, should be pushed to the wing or HF where he can find more time and space.
On paper sure but it doesn’t translate to games, are you happy relying on finn who has played one game of afl, Jones who has played 1 game...Mitchell, Worpel and JOM with Maginess, Jones and Cousins in reserve is more than enough. Those first three should be good enough, we sure pay them as if they are.
On paper sure but it doesn’t translate to games, are you happy relying on finn who has played one game of afl, Jones who has played 1 game...
Did you watch our midfield last year? I wouldn't be worried about what we need at the minute. Only thing we need is best available.The only thing we don't need is inside mids
Did you watch our midfield last year? I wouldn't be worried about what we need at the minute. Only thing we need is best available.
100% and our forward line was completely dysfunctional the two years he was in charge of it. Was stoked when it was announced he was leaving.Noted above already. The other thing I will say is I find the lack of criticism of [PLAYERCARD]Scott Burns[/PLAYERCARD]' coaching to be bizarre. The one thing we should be able to do is win clearances, and he somehow had us in a huge defecit. Sure, part of this is down to Ceglar's inability to ruck/ give away constant frees, but I still feel like he got out relatively unscathed given Clarkson was seen on camera at a quarter time break re-writing Burns' entire stoppage set-ups.
Understandable. Henry is projected to go around 7 so not massive reach but probably a little early. What he showed as an under age player gives me the impression he has a very high ceiling. I’m a bit on my own on that one though.Bruhn for me , Henry is a massive reach at 4
Yeah the Day pick last year has me feeling we might go for Henry. Upside and X factor.Understandable. Henry is projected to go around 7 so not massive reach but probably a little early. What he showed as an under age player gives me the impression he has a very high ceiling. I’m a bit on my own on that one though.
"Hagdorn" sounds like Hawthorn tried to come up with a fake name for themselves at the last second.Thought you guys might be interested to know about this
though I can't vouch for how reliable Hagdorn is.
Hope not, has some ability but hasn’t played well against adults and he hasn’t really got the skills to be a gun forward and isn’t tall enough to be a dominant ruck. There will be better players on the board at 4.If Thilthorpe is there when it’s our pick, we will snap him up.
I'm not sure we will. Probably a moot point though.If Thilthorpe is there when it’s our pick, we will snap him up.