Fair enough. Pretty small sample size because of injury but ticks a lot of boxes for me.Just seems like a Solid Prospect but nothing that Stands Out to me
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fair enough. Pretty small sample size because of injury but ticks a lot of boxes for me.Just seems like a Solid Prospect but nothing that Stands Out to me
If Daicos is top 5 as most are suggesting, we’ll need somewhere in the realms of 1800-3000 points for him. Thats not an overly great result, particularly if he goes top 2.If we were to finish 8, we would have picks 11(1329 pts), 29(653) x2, 47(316), 65(90). As we have 2 x 2nds, we could use our 1st and one of our 2, 2nds or our 3rd and still have over 1000 points, for Daicos. Dons may well agree to that.
If Daicos is top 5 as most are suggesting, we’ll need somewhere in the realms of 1800-3000 points for him. Thats not an overly great result, particularly if he goes top 2.
We’ll do what we have to in order to get him Dave. It’s preferable to avoid going in to deficit if we can though.IF he is good as Advertised would he be worth going into possible deficit in the 2022 Draft?
Hopefully he hasn't been put off by all the recent going's on.We’ll do what we have to in order to get him Dave. It’s preferable to avoid going in to deficit if we can though.
We will have some trades that will be made next year as well as, if a little short, we could go into deficit. Anyway I was just pointing it out.If Daicos is top 5 as most are suggesting, we’ll need somewhere in the realms of 1800-3000 points for him. Thats not an overly great result, particularly if he goes top 2.
We’ll do what we have to in order to get him Dave. It’s preferable to avoid going in to deficit if we can though.
I’m sure that despite everything that’s happened, he’d still much rather play with his brother than be drafted to one of the bottom feeder clubs, which is what will happen if he enters the open draft.Hopefully he hasn't been put off by all the recent going's on.
Fair enough. Pretty small sample size because of injury but ticks a lot of boxes for me.
I think we already have guys that can play Chapman role.If we can trade up for a top 5 pick (nearly impossible), Will Phillips, DGB or Thilthorpe (whomever is available).
If we trade up for a late top 10; Reid/Cox/Chapman.
I really just hope we can get 2 picks ahead of Reef. Gonna be costly though.
With the 20% discount, do what the dogs have done. All you need is a bunch of 2nd/3rd rounders and it covers the points.If Daicos is top 5 as most are suggesting, we’ll need somewhere in the realms of 1800-3000 points for him. Thats not an overly great result, particularly if he goes top 2.
I think we already have guys that can play Chapman role.
If Daicos is top 5 as most are suggesting, we’ll need somewhere in the realms of 1800-3000 points for him. Thats not an overly great result, particularly if he goes top 2.
Does that mean 3 from the ND and upgrade 3 rookies? Need 36 on senior list so have to put 6 more on senior list don't we?
I don't understand why clubs seem so reluctant to go into deficit for academy,father son kids. They effectively go on to deficit for other players when they trade out future picks.We’ll do what we have to in order to get him Dave. It’s preferable to avoid going in to deficit if we can though.