Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Age 22.1.19 M.Fowler
Fowler said, re the AFLW 2018 B & F "Emma Kearney is critical of the AFL's decision not to make it one match against each of the other 9 teams" in 2019.
E. Kearney said
"They were the ones that introduced expansion, so I think they've got to own that...if you asked EVERY (my emphasis) AFLW player, they'd want to be playing every team once...If we keep having a seven-game season, girls that come from different sports will think "you know what? I'm actually going to stick with my basketball, or my netball" and not do footy. It's a big commitment for only a small competition".
If the AFL don't greatly expand the AFLW 2020 season, they are incompetent & hypocrites.
(Recently, McLachlan said "Nothing is more important to the AFL than the AFLW". Footscray Chairman P.Gordon said "The AFLW is the most important development since Wills and Harrison" ie since 1858!).
The AFL will, rightfully, attract much scorn & multiple attacks from players & many others, & its hypocrisy will be constantly challenged over a disrespectful "Mickey Mouse comp."
(I am assuming that, at the end of the 2019 AFLW season, virtually all AFLW experts declare there has been a noticeable improvement in skills in the average player, & a more attractive, free-flowing game style- which I am expecting).
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl...er-new-kids-on-the-block-20190121-p50sqn.html
The AFL redistributing funds no doubt, but let's not rule out the increased revenue opportunities attached to a longer, better season with more teams. It isn't a question of whether it will become a 16-week competition, just when, and the push for that is not just coming from players but also club officials and administrators etc.Where does the cost come for the extra rounds??
The tv costs, extra salaries?
They already put in way more hours than contracted for, but that doesn't matter, officially speaking it is not allowed.Would the women be happy to get paid the same amount for 4 more weeks work??
In addition to many Melb. private girls' schools promoting female AF after the 2003 court decision (the cynics might say promotion of female AF dovetailed nicely with the private girls' schools mantra/advertising "Private girls' schools provide the best environment to fully challenge girls' interests, horizons & stereotypes"), Melb.'s southern suburbs' JFC's were most prominent.Something apparent as the comp, and womens footy in general, expands. I try to have a look at comps like TAC cup and VFLW to see who is coming along, and I haven't heard of any of Saints signings. As lower and junior leagues expand, the number of places to look and find hidden talent is growing.
Where does the cost come for the extra rounds??
The tv costs, extra salaries?
Would the women be happy to get paid the same amount for 4 more weeks work??
How much is the tv revenue?Why would they get paid the same for 4 more weeks? 4 more weeks of TV revenue should trickle into their pockets.
How much is the tv revenue?
My question was would the AFLW players be prepared to work for 4 more weeks, for no more money to improve the AFLW game in the long term.
I currently assume, they make no money through TV Revenue or attendance. I could be wrong.
Their player payments would come indirectly through TV Revenue, as I'm sure the next TV deal will include the AFLW rights.
They may be fine with it, but their deal was negotiated by the AFLPA, who I would assume would be dead against players being asked to put in extra hours for no pay, "for the good of the league".How much is the tv revenue?
My question was would the AFLW players be prepared to work for 4 more weeks, for no more money to improve the AFLW game in the long term.
I currently assume, they make no money through TV Revenue or attendance. I could be wrong.
That will be interesting& it will include the AFLW games, be interesting to see how those close to the dollars leak the AFLW value as part of the tendered deal.
No, the men's salary was negotiated first. The women's salary was then negotiated out of the AFLs take of revenue. This is why the AFLPA could negotiate the women's deal without it being a conflict.That will be interesting
Does this affect the guys salary ? I thought they got more if the afl income went above a certain level.
Just like in the Dockers-Magpies gameday thread, this poster mentions a number (in this case four) of ex-Collingwood players lost via non-expansion avenues as if it's a reason for more/better compensation picks.This comps a farce
We got in early WHY
STEVENS B. & f
Eva 2nd b& f
King
Bernardi
Hope
DUFfin
Garner
Edwards
AND NOW ANOTHER 4 lol
Explain
Why did Carlton get the first live pick in Victoria , where's the compensation?
7 wins in 19 games
Adelaide a state and territory team , heavily subsidised by a promo $
Gws. Ditto
Freo ditto
North ditto ( Tasmania)
It's a wonderful system
What we get this year pick 13 in Victoria
Apparently they have plans but think it's inappropriate to share them with the public.Does the AFLW have any long-term plans or are they just looking 12-24 months ahead?
I'm sick of this rubbish about minimising the overlap between AFLM and AFLW.
When will the AFLW be more than 7 H&A rounds?
Apparently they have plans but think it's inappropriate to share them with the public.
Aka they are massively winging it.
Or the plans have layers of contingencies and dependencies and they dealing with a PR minefield and a competitive sporting environment
Aka playing their cards close is precisely what they should be doing
I flip flop between being furious at the AFL for their stupid decisions, and recognising that what everyone else wants them to do instead may be even dumber. There is a benefit to shouting advice from the sidelines, everybody doesn't get to see your suggestion absolutely suck in practice.I would normally agree with you, but this administration has done so painfully little to earn trust over the last few years that I just can't believe they're genuinely on top of things. Part of the reason this is all so tense is because of the decisions the AFL has made in this area and their very poor communications up to this point, which doesn't suggest to me that there's any kind of master plan going on behind the scenes.
I really do hope you're right though.