- Apr 26, 2016
- AFL Club
Play in a simulated football league - find great movies and TV shows - play Werewolf - play video games (try our Minecraft server) - argue about politics - listen to music - keep up with science news - play board games - just gasbag - discuss true crime - and so much more.
I think that's exactly where we're going and have already started shifting (Florent, Hayward, Papley and Jones have attended a lot of contests and won a decent share of our clearances over the last two years and you'd assume they want Stephens and Clarke to get amongst it too. Maybe even Taylor or Gray).It has puzzled me why, with Hanners going, JPK, Jack, Parker all ageing, the Swans haven't tried to trade or draft a big bodied inside mid over the last few years. The makeup of our midfield is evolving, moving away from the Swans being the best contested ball team, to, a pacey, skilful midfield.
All those posters who have been demanding a change in the game plan, maybe the Recruiters have been onto that for a few years now??
patience is a virtue
Imagine a quick and skilful midfield, being fed off half back by guys like Dawson, Gould, Mills, Alliirr, Ling, Lloyd. Could be a good time to be a forward.
250 game player for the club will do me fine.Can’t see florent becoming a pure a grader
Just doesn’t have that level in him imo
250 game player for the club will do me fine.
Sort of like a Jude Bolton who played 300games for our club & grabbing 2 p'ships along the way.
He was never an A Grader. Just a good old fashioned Blood!
You have raised one similar thingInteresting that Hanners was an absolute star despite his shitful kicking, but you say Florent won't be because of it.
What has he or look like a star?Think we can agree Florent is a good player regardless
Doesn’t need to be Hannebery or Bolton etc
I think a lot would agree he is not the future of the clubs success more a nice complementary piece which every club needs
Many would think he is a star I guess fair enough if you do
What has he or look like a star?
Fair enough. But they are different players having different roles for the benefit of the team & they will both make plenty of mistakes.Why? Just don’t think he will rack up possession numbers
Rather florent getting 19 than Lloyd 35 useless touches
Fair enough. But they are different players having different roles for the benefit of the team & they will both make plenty of mistakes.
The important thing is that they combine well for the team & do more good with their roles than bad.
When those 53 games have been spent almost entirely developing and not anywhere close to a player's prime, then they absolutely do. He has had some starring games, and some not so. Why is it so difficult for you to grasp that someone might just think those starring games will become more and more regular?No different to pointing out years in the system
People 53 games in don’t suddenly become stars from no where