to get you have to give
nothing is for free and no reason for Geelong to feel a sense of entitlement
Tom Lynch.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
LIVE: Sydney v Carlton - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 60% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists »
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
LIVE: Sydney v Carlton - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 60% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists »
to get you have to give
nothing is for free and no reason for Geelong to feel a sense of entitlement
Young + Jackson seem like the 2 that will go at 3 and 4
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
This was what was posted on the trades boardSomeone is going to have to explain this to me...
We take whoever at pick 4
Bid comes on Green at 5
How many points?
If we are in deficit for next year, that comes off our first round selection doesn’t it? But that’s now with Adelaide. Do they slide? Or does our points come off a later selection meaning we basically lose our second rounder as well. We won’t be entering the draft until the mid sixties?
And does that mean we’ll be done by pick 5 or will we still have really late picks this year? If we’re in deficit for next year, how can we still have picks this year?
I is confused.
Someone is going to have to explain this to me...
We take whoever at pick 4
Bid comes on Green at 5
How many points?
If we are in deficit for next year, that comes off our first round selection doesn’t it? But that’s now with Adelaide. Do they slide? Or does our points come off a later selection meaning we basically lose our second rounder as well. We won’t be entering the draft until the mid sixties?
And does that mean we’ll be done by pick 5 or will we still have really late picks this year? If we’re in deficit for next year, how can we still have picks this year?
I is confused.
By my maths that's correct, except we can match Melbourne's bid on Green with pick 4.This was what was posted on the trades board
Traded - GWS trade #6 and future R1 pick (tied to GWS) to Adelaide for #4
Can Adelaide turn 6 into Fremantles 10 and a future first. Essentially turning 4 into 10 and 2 additional first round picks. Depends if Adelaide thinks they can get a player they like at 10 Nah. You wouldn't think. You'd suggest our first next year is worth a hell of a lot more than GWS's...www.bigfooty.com
I'm confused myself.
It will only cost points on picks we actually own so no impact on the crows at all.
But if the Swans bid on Green as expected with the 20% discount we will need to pay up 1500 pts and at the moment we only have 733 pts with pick 40 59 and 60 so its going to pretty much wipe out all our picks for next year.
I think this is just a bit dodgy. I would prefer to keep 12,18 and then trade down. Look at the Devon Smith deal, we got the equivalent of a late second rounder , but also got pick 11 which was Bonar. What happened to him, given away for almost nothing.It will only cost points on picks we actually own so no impact on the crows at all.
But if the Swans bid on Green as expected with the 20% discount we will need to pay up 1500 pts and at the moment we only have 733 pts with pick 40 59 and 60 so its going to pretty much wipe out all our picks for next year.
You would have to suspect Melbourne have told GWS they won't be bidding on Green. I expect they take Jackson at 3 & then GWS take Young at 4 & Green at 5 to match Sydney's bid. A really good result for GWS if it pans out like that.We wouldn't have done this if we weren't 99% confident Green wouldn't get bid on by Melbourne
You would have to suspect Melbourne have told GWS they won't be bidding on Green. I expect they take Jackson at 3 & then GWS take Young at 4 & Green at 5 to match Sydney's bid. A really good result for GWS if it pans out like that.
Haha.Tom green will be a tiger when his contract is up so why are you bothering getting him his grandfather played in 4 flags for Richmond and he is a mad tigers supporter so you can keep him warm for us for 2 years
[emoji848] Ive heard this before. I just can't put my finger on it......Tom green will be a tiger when his contract is up so why are you bothering getting him his grandfather played in 4 flags for Richmond and he is a mad tigers supporter so you can keep him warm for us for 2 years
Tom green will be a tiger when his contract is up so why are you bothering getting him his grandfather played in 4 flags for Richmond and he is a mad tigers supporter so you can keep him warm for us for 2 years
According to the Herald Sun:
Gold Coast 1. Matt Rowell (Oakleigh Chargers, 180cm midfielder)
Gold Coast 2. Noah Anderson (Oakleigh Chargers, 191cm midfield-forward)
Melbourne 3. Luke Jackson (East Fremantle, 199cm ruckman)
GWS 4. Lachie Ash (Murray Bushrangers, 186cm halfback)
GWS 5. Tom Green* (GWS academy, 191cm midfielder)
Sydney 6. Sam Flanders (Gippsland Power, 182cm midfielder)
Adelaide 7. Fischer McAsey (Sandringham Dragons, 197cm defender)
Fremantle 8. Hayden Young (Dandenong Stingrays, 188cm halfback)
Melbourne 9. Demons will trade this pick to another club
Carlton 10. Caleb Serong (Gippsland Power, 179cm midfield-forward)
Fremantle 11. Deven Robertson (Perth, 184cm midfielder)
Hawthorn 12. Brodie Kemp (Bendigo Pioneers, 193cm defender)
Port Adelaide 13. Dylan Stephens (Norwood, 183cm midfielder)
Western Bulldogs 14. Miles Bergman (Sandringham Dragons, 189cm utility)
*GWS matches Sydney’s bid for Green, pushing the order back one