- May 26, 2003
- 24,240
- 18,053
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- SFFC, Aussie Women's Cricket, HNK
Langdon?We have lost 3 notable players in recent years; Neale, BHill and Weller. Not a Victorian among them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Langdon?We have lost 3 notable players in recent years; Neale, BHill and Weller. Not a Victorian among them.
You consider Langdon notable?Langdon?
More like it is because we pay crabs like Blakely about the sameAnd that friends is how you finish in the bottom 8 for 5 yrs in a row and still have salary cap problems
Sent from my iPad using BigFooty.com
But we'd have a prime Neale who just won a brownlow....
The club has been taking a risk in recent years in selecting non WA talents.
Recently we have drafted Sturt, Brayshaw, Cerra, Young and Serong. All top line talent and all flight risks by dint of being Victorian.
I hope we keep them all but I would be staggered if we did not lose at least one of them over the next couple of years.
One has to be realistic.
No current season stats available
He might have without Lyon favouring Fyfe/Fyfe forward a lot more this year. Also doesn't make Neale any less of a player he is still capable of it.He wouldn't have won the Brownlow in the same midfield as Fyfe.
He might have without Lyon favouring Fyfe.
I edited my post. He is still good enough to win a brownlow he doesn't become less of a player because he might not win it with Fyfe in the team.In 2016 Lachie Nealehad 737 disposals at Freo and wasn't picked in the All Australian team. This year he had 511 disposals and won the Brownlow.PLAYERCARDSTART9Lachie Neale
- Age
- 30
- Ht
- 178cm
- Wt
- 84kg
- Pos.
- Mid
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 27.0
- 5star
- K
- 11.5
- 4star
- HB
- 15.5
- 5star
- M
- 4.0
- 4star
- T
- 3.7
- 5star
- CL
- 5.9
- 5star
- D
- 28.3
- 5star
- K
- 13.9
- 5star
- HB
- 14.4
- 5star
- M
- 4.6
- 4star
- T
- 4.0
- 5star
- CL
- 5.9
- 5star
- D
- 12.0
- 3star
- K
- 4.6
- 2star
- HB
- 7.4
- 5star
- M
- 2.0
- 3star
- T
- 1.0
- 3star
- CL
- 0.4
- 3star
PLAYERCARDEND
Even when Fyfe was injured Neale was seen as a B grader by many during his time at Fremantle.
Is it "Lyon favouring Fyfe"? Or just Fyfe being the best player in the competition? I mean, who would you select as your premium mid - Fyfe or Neale?He might have without Lyon favouring Fyfe/Fyfe forward a lot more this year. Also doesn't make Neale any less of a player he is still capable of it.
nuthin serong with that...Just meet a first cousin of Serong. Whole family converted to the purple.
Just meet a first cousin of Serong. Whole family converted to the purple.
Fair enough. He was best 22, but I think we are better off without him despite getting a nothing trade.Langdon?
Yes, and even locally I’d be pretty disappointed if the O’Driscoll family aren’t having a purple makeover this Christmas.This is the way
No on is arguing that he hasn't developed. The point is we would like him to be worth a top 5 pick if he does leave and doubtless he would like 900k no matter where he is.Again, he's another player who came equal third in the club's B&F in just his third year. That says he's going more than a little ok as far as his development goes.
Exactly, he said he didn’t want to come to Freo then changed his mind and decided to stay another two years, to me that makes him less of a risk than Serong or Young. Quoting something he said over 3 years ago before he was drafted is irrelevant. I’d be more concerned if his partner declared it was time to start a family, the lure of grandparents helping with a new born far outweighs anything he said as an 18yo.Because people change their minds.
Well as far as always having Fyfe the number 1 hit to mid yes and using Mundy forward instead of Fyfe, this year we saw Mundy in the middle and Fyfe forward so you tell me?Is it "Lyon favouring Fyfe"? Or just Fyfe being the best player in the competition? I mean, who would you select as your premium mid - Fyfe or Neale?
The evidence suggests he's ahead of the normal development curve. It's not really the average standard to put together a top 3 B&F season for the vast majority of 3rd-year players. Likewise, you don't get to be top 5 in the B&F without a reasonable amount of consistency. Brownlow votes can often be a matter of recognition, particularly for players earlier in their careers, so using them as a standard may not be all that reliable.No on is arguing that he hasn't developed. The point is we would like him to be worth a top 5 pick if he does leave and doubtless he would like 900k no matter where he is.
No one should be offering him these on the basis of 6 career Brownlow votes (just 3 in the last two years), 15 touches and 1.4 clearances a game.
Obviously development curves are different for different players. Judd at one end of scale, Gary Ablett jnr at the other, most inbetween: I thinks it's fair to say that unless Cerra is on the Ablett style curve we're heading for a A minus B plus sort of player rather than a superstar. For every Ablett there are 10 Stephen Hill's.PLAYERCARDSTART32Stephen Hill
- Age
- 33
- Ht
- 183cm
- Wt
- 82kg
- Pos.
- Def
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 19.5
- 5star
- K
- 11.7
- 4star
- HB
- 7.8
- 5star
- M
- 3.0
- 3star
- T
- 2.9
- 4star
- MG
- 223.5
- 3star
- D
- 13.5
- 3star
- K
- 8.8
- 4star
- HB
- 4.8
- 3star
- M
- 4.8
- 4star
- T
- 0.8
- 1star
- MG
- 223.5
- 3star
- D
- 11.2
- 3star
- K
- 5.4
- 2star
- HB
- 5.8
- 4star
- M
- 2.2
- 3star
- T
- 2.8
- 5star
PLAYERCARDEND
Obviously I hope I'm wrong.
There's a bit of shifting the goal posts and placing a straw man in between them. Who's said Fyfe is/was "always" the no. 1 goto? In 2015 he'd hoover everything because he could and only injury and dubious tactics slowed him down slightly. But if I had to pick a mid to play for my life between Fyfe and Neale, Fyfe is an easy choice.Well as far as always having Fyfe the number 1 hit to mid yes and using Mundy forward instead of Fyfe, this year we saw Mundy in the middle and Fyfe forward so you tell me?
TBF the "use your eyes" argument is just another way of saying "see it my way".Yeah I'm sure there are stats that could be quoted ad nauseum by either side of the argument to justify why Cerra is and is not going to be an A grader.
I suggest just using your eyes. He's going to be elite. It's like all the nuffies over the years quoting possession numbers as an argument against Cyril Rioli being considered elite. Use your eyes people.
Sounds like your the one shifting goal posts for distraction by throwing out that one liner without any examples at least I provided some vague reason such as Mundy forward and Fyfe mid and now that JLo is coach it's Fyfe forward and Mundy mid.There's a bit of shifting the goal posts and placing a straw man in between them. Who's said Fyfe is/was "always" the no. 1 goto? In 2015 he'd hoover everything because he could and only injury and dubious tactics slowed him down slightly. But if I had to pick a mid to play for my life between Fyfe and Neale, Fyfe is an easy choice.
Mundy played forward when we had no talls to play there, also no mids that weren't either tadpoles or soon to be delisted. If we had another elite mid like Neale then maybe Fyfe would have played foward, I expect they both would have played on ball still.Sounds like your the one shifting goal posts for distraction by throwing out that one liner without any examples at least I provided some vague reason such as Mundy forward and Fyfe mid and now that JLo is coach it's Fyfe forward and Mundy mid.
But yeah Fyfe is a beast the real question was if you had to picka mid to play for your life of Neale and Serong who would it be?