List Mgmt. 2020 List Management II

[katmanblue]

Eddie Ford, Brayden Cook and Archie Perkins come to mind, and one would be close-ish to our first pick, so within modest trading territory perhaps.

Isiah Winder is another I'd like us to target, but not as a forward. This draft goes deeper than people think, and I'm honestly shocked how readily we cast aside pick 8 for Saad. That was a terrible trade.

It was a terrible trade, but the team is still improved for next year.

It's just a question of how much more it could have been improved.

 

[bmaurizio]

Yup , Moore , Polson and Owies all need to be moved on , 2021 will see more reductions too.
The days of carrying bulging lists are over.

 

[chipzac]

The 44 maximum includes 2 Cat B rookies.

So it's really a 42 maximum, with a maximum of 38 senior players.
As it stands, we need to cut at least one senior player to make our single single required pick in the draft, or 2, if we want to use both our picks.

Not looking good for Polson or Kennedy.

Perhaps, given all the changes made on the fly, the aFL will let Clubs move players onto the rookie list without going through the draft? But who knows.

If Cat B rookies are included in the maximum number, maybe not looking good for Owies, either.

 

[DirkDiggler]

My concerns with Pitto is he is inept as a resting forward

or after the ruck contest. Great physicality but ground work and ability to cover ground non existent. Marking also not a feature. Tends to take two grabs to mark

 

[Stamos]

If Cat B rookies are included in the maximum number, maybe not looking good for Owies, either.

Cat B are included in the maximum number including Cat B. The maximum number not including Cat B is 2 less, ie 42.

I assume (I know, but educated guess) that the reason Owies doesn't have a contract yet is that the Club has been waiting for confirmation of the rules.

 

[Stamos]

Yup , Moore , Polson and Owies all need to be moved on , 2021 will see more reductions too.
The days of carrying bulging lists are over.

Why Owies?

 

[DirkDiggler]

You would think so.

There would also be an option to rookie Macreadie or Kennedy.

Makes no sense that we would re rookie Macreadie given that we rejected Geelong's overtures. We would have made a firm commitment to him. Read somewhere we have already offered Kennedy a one year contract but no club came sniffing for him even though he would have gone cheaply

 

[Stamos]

Makes no sense that we would re rookie Macreadie given that we rejected Geelong's overtures. We would have made a firm commitment to him. Read somewhere we have already offered Kennedy a one year contract but no club came sniffing for him even though he would have gone cheaply

Where did you read about Kennedy?
The last I saw was earlier in the week when his manager said we were waiting for confirmation on list sizes.

 

[scblues]

So exactly how many players are on our list right now? and how many rookies on our list including cat b right now??

 

[The Bighouse]

Makes no sense that we would re rookie Macreadie given that we rejected Geelong's overtures. We would have made a firm commitment to him. Read somewhere we have already offered Kennedy a one year contract but no club came sniffing for him even though he would have gone cheaply

Unless we were getting a future pick, probably doesn’t make sense to offload HM.
35 on the list as we stand (Incl Gibbons upgrade) with HM, MK @ CamPo OOC.
2 spare spots on the rookie list.
Juggling act on who stays & where + number/s to be taken at ND & RD.
Wonder if there’s an unwritten rule re: rookie demotions this year won’t be snagged in the RD if there’s an agreement by club & player.

 

[The Bighouse]

So exactly how many players are on our list right now? and how many rookies on our list including cat b right now??

35 senior
2 rookies (Cottrell, Honey)
1 Cat B awaiting re-contracting in Owies & allowed up to 2

 

[Stamos]

So exactly how many players are on our list right now? and how many rookies on our list including cat b right now??

38/4/1

Of those, Macreadie, Kennedy, Polson/ Phillips, Moore/ Owies haven't had new contracts announced.
As a minimum requirement, we will need cut 1 more senior player.

 

[scblues]

38/4/1

Of those, Macreadie, Kennedy, Polson/ Phillips, Moore/ Owies haven't had new contracts announced.
As a minimum requirement, we will need cut 1 more senior player.

tyvm, so id suggest its Moore (only chance he has of staying is the CC factor, but if they think Kennedy can do it, hes gone..), or its polson or Phillips gone. my 2 c

 

[scblues]

tyvm, so id suggest its Moore (only chance he has of staying is the CC factor, but if they think Kennedy can do it, hes gone..), or its polson or Phillips gone. my 2 c

I forgot it has to be a senior player, so id say its either Phillips or polson..

 

[Stamos]

I forgot it has to be a senior player, so id say its either Phillips or polson..

Phillips is a rookie. We need to cut a minimum of 1 but more likely 2 of Macreadie (who everyone thinks we are keeping), Kennedy or Polson.

 

[DirkDiggler]

Phillips would be stiff to be cut. Not yet tested, has the goal sense to deliver scoreboard pressure and long range goal kicking that we need.

 

[Sheephead]

I agree with Polson. Just hasn't come on for me and the abridged season just gone wasn't enough to evaluate the other rookies/youngsters. Do we keep Moore??

 

[DirkDiggler]

I agree with Polson. Just hasn't come on for me and the abridged season just gone wasn't enough to evaluate the other rookies/youngsters. Do we keep Moore??

Moore or Less... I would settle on Less.

 

[Sheephead]

We only need to draft 1. We have plenty of unknown still to work with.

 

[scblues]

If we cut say a moore, we cant switch polson to rookie right? I mean, he will have to go through the rookie draft set up correct?

 

[katmanblue]

35 senior
2 rookies (Cottrell, Honey)
1 Cat B awaiting re-contracting in Owies & allowed up to 2

Does than include elevating Gibbons?

 

[katmanblue]

So exactly how many players are on our list right now? and how many rookies on our list including cat b right now??

Scroll up

 

[The Bighouse]

Does than include elevating Gibbons?

Yes

Possibility that there could be another trade window opened up...AFL on the run.

 

[Team DJ]

I am 5 ft 8. And haven't played footy since 2009. But I think I am more worth as a KPP than Moore

 

[bigblueboy]

38/4/1

Of those, Macreadie, Kennedy, Polson/ Phillips, Moore/ Owies haven't had new contracts announced.
As a minimum requirement, we will need cut 1 more senior player.

I suspect we will want two national draft picks which means another senior delisting - or movement to the rookie list.
Options are:

38 senior list/4 Cat A/up to 2 Cat B
Delist one of Polson/Kennedy/Macreadie
Add pick 38
Add one Cat B

38 senior list/4 Cat A/up to 2 Cat B
Delist two of Polson/Kennedy/Macreadie
Add picks 38, 48
Add one Cat B

38 senior list/4 Cat A/up to 2 Cat B
Delist one of Polson/Kennedy/Macreadie
Move one of Polson/Kennedy/Macreadie to Cat A rookie list
Add picks 38, 48
Delist one Cat A (Moore/Phillips)
Add one Cat B

This factors Gibbons already being upgraded and Owies being allowed to stay on Cat B list. I suspect we are going with option 3.