Analysis 2020 North apparel

Remove this Banner Ad

Strange on the day but really noticeable on the replay. Have you got a vhs copy of the '96 season ?

no, i don't, haven't seen the game. it probably would've been worn more but it was our only home game for the first 4 rounds, by round 5 we were wearing the classic 3 stripe design
 

Log in to remove this ad.

yes, according to Mero

sounds to me like it was probably the manufacturer not understanding how the jumper was supposed to look. I've never seen footage of the game where we wore this so i don't know
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

In all seriousness, it should be easy;
View attachment 779758View attachment 779759
They won't do that because the Dark jumper has to get work with Dark Shorts and the Light jumper has to get worn with Light Shorts.
Everyone else except Geelong wears Dark at Home and Light Away.
The only way around it is to wear White shorts at Home and have the Away team wear Dark shorts.
But anyone who watched footy between 1924 and 2007 got used to Dark shorts at Home and White Away.
 
Looks like a child drew it on MS Paint and used the wrong drawing tool.

Yep. Just awful. No chance I'll buy a jumper this year to add to the collection - maybe the indigenous one will recoup them a sale... Just no need to be screwing around with the classic jumper. The extra lines make it look weak IMO.
 
Well, that looks s**t.


I dunno why they have to constantly mess with the home jumper. Leave that alone and play graphic artist with the away/indigenous ones.

They're certainly not in touch with the rusted ons.
 
Yeah its loose but isn't the point with Latin translations?

For me, personally, its easily close enough.
Yeah there's a saying "The Latin means whatever you need it to mean". That motto is usually rendered as "Amat Victoria Curam", btw. Someone at NM decided to redo it in English word order for some reason.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top