- Jul 31, 2017
- 3,099
- 7,521
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Dixon to Hawkins Bonner Full Forward
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Our team defense has worked well all year and shutting off Hawkins leading patterns or cutting off his ability to be 1 on 1 should lead to a big turnaround on the previous result.
If Jonas is on Hawkins, who takes Dangerfield when he goes forward? This seems like such a gamble.
Yep, Clurey’s height isn’t the issue. It’s what we have as back ups now that we don’t have that height.I'm not massively concerned about Clurey being out because of his height (he's not THAT big anyway) but more wtf do we do if Hawkins gets on top of Jonas.
If Geelong can isolate Hawkins again we're f’ed anyway.
If Jonas is on Hawkins, who takes Dangerfield when he goes forward? This seems like such a gamble.
It's funny, my recollections are that Choco knew we where up against it and was just trying to enjoy the week.
There was a reference to the footy show earlier, again that came off to me like Choco saying ”Geelong are the best side but we won't make up the numbers". i.e we'll give it a crack but don't hold your breath.
During the game even, he was counselled to throw numbers behind the ball but didn't think it was in the spirit of the occasion.
Some harsh revisionism on this board.
As head coach, Choco owns that half time decision.
The “don’t lock things down, it’s not in the spirit of the game” idea allegedly came from Phil Walsh during the long break. Sadly he’s not around to dispute the claim.
Sadly *I* can’t recall who it was that said “it was Phil”.
On iPhone using recycled electrons, via BigFooty.com mobile app
The 'he's only 2 - 3 cm shorter!' fallacy is one that annoys me. That's 2 - 3cm body height, add in that'd be another 1 - 2 cm in arm length, then another 1 to 2 cm in vertical leap likely as well and 'only 2 - 3cm' is actually giving away 4 - 7 cm in marking contests.Burton and McKenzie are 2cm shorter than Clurey.
The 'he's only 2 - 3 cm shorter!' fallacy is one that annoys me. That's 2 - 3cm body height, add in that'd be another 1 - 2 cm in arm length, then another 1 to 2 cm in vertical leap likely as well and 'only 2 - 3cm' is actually giving away 4 - 7 cm in marking contests.
The 'he's only 2 - 3 cm shorter!' fallacy is one that annoys me. That's 2 - 3cm body height, add in that'd be another 1 - 2 cm in arm length, then another 1 to 2 cm in vertical leap likely as well and 'only 2 - 3cm' is actually giving away 4 - 7 cm in marking contests.