I think there's enough risk in your team without adding TMac to the mix
Fair enough! Where do you see the other risk lie?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I think there's enough risk in your team without adding TMac to the mix
I know the question isn’t to me but the risks I see:Fair enough! Where do you see the other risk lie?
Thanks, any food for thought this time of year is great, so much to change as of yet, dawson so easily interchangeable with the likes of Steven, Greenwood, wingard who we all need to see play in matches, love the different structures this yearI know the question isn’t to me but the risks I see:
- batting one less premium in midfield compared to most, although I understand why you’ve gone this route
- outside of Whit and Dev, the whole forward line is quite risky. I like the Dawson pick but we’ve got a tiny sample size from him as research so could be safer to play the wait and see game. But don’t let that persuade you into not picking him if you’re keen on him. Uniques are what make this game interesting
I like the team and the way you have structured it. But I personally wouldn't go near Selwood, he's done, I understand that you've gone for a mid pricer but he's not going to make any cash, he's not a keeper and you're better off with a rookie or downgrading somewhere else and getting a season long keeper. JMO of course.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Nope, none of them. I would rather down grade somewhere else and at least have a speculative mid at M5, someone like a Lyons or Curnow? It's bloody difficult trying to find an ideal starting team, just cos there;s so many permutations and combinations, but it's important to start those players that you see as keepers for the year.Cheers for the feedback. Definitely do not wan't to have four rookies on field in the mids. Would you consider any of Gibbs, Ward, Wingard or Andrew Brayshaw in place of Selwood?
How annoying is it that Houston is so popularThe most vanilla team in fantasy (via AFL fantasy Twitter)
View attachment 818092
How annoying is it that Houston is so popular
Similar to my ownThe most vanilla team in fantasy (via AFL fantasy Twitter)
View attachment 818092

Similar to a lot of teams Ive seen on twitter tbh!Similar to my own![]()

I'm being a smarta*** but the number of permutations are irrelevant, you only need to consider the number of combinations.Nope, none of them. I would rather down grade somewhere else and at least have a speculative mid at M5, someone like a Lyons or Curnow? It's bloody difficult trying to find an ideal starting team, just cos there;s so many permutations and combinations, but it's important to start those players that you see as keepers for the year.
Oh man!! The last time that I looked at differential calculus was in 1977, Gimme a break!I'm being a smarta*** but the number of permutations are irrelevant, you only need to consider the number of combinations.
So, actually, if there are 44 players on each squad (792 total player pool), there are 1.98E+54 combinations, which is the same as the number of permutations (unless you are considering the bench as different permutations, but I'd say in PS that's irrelevant.
![]()
Nope, none of them. I would rather down grade somewhere else and at least have a speculative mid at M5, someone like a Lyons or Curnow? It's bloody difficult trying to find an ideal starting team, just cos there;s so many permutations and combinations, but it's important to start those players that you see as keepers for the year.
I cant see him playing inside early with the elbow issue...Thoughts on Angus Brayshaw as a speculative M5 then?
Did a few rookie tweaks and was able to get Fyfe to Dunkley and Selwood to Brayshaw.
Macrae, Dunkley, Mitchell, Coniglio and Angus Brayshaw would be M1-M5.
Can understand why people would not touch him, but he’s young, underpriced for what we have seen him do when not being played on the wing.
I cant see him playing inside early with the elbow issue...
I don't think it's differential calculus...it's ways been classified as counting since Ive learnt itOh man!! The last time that I looked at differential calculus was in 1977, Gimme a break!
Just be careful you don't downgrade too mich with the rooks and are left with your hands tied behind your back come selection nightThoughts on Angus Brayshaw as a speculative M5 then?
Did a few rookie tweaks and was able to get Fyfe to Dunkley and Selwood to Brayshaw.
Macrae, Dunkley, Mitchell, Coniglio and Angus Brayshaw would be M1-M5.
Can understand why people would not touch him, but he’s young, underpriced for what we have seen him do when not being played on the wing.
Ok, I'm going to throw it out there
Rocky
Discuss
Ok, I'm going to throw it out there
Rocky
Discuss
Same was in and now out... reckon he'll go bang with some big scores as per usual but then applying the durability filter it all comes unstuck.I have had him in and out. Currently out
Nice team.At a point now where I'm tired of chopping and changing. I think I'll call it here and keenly await the MCS for more clarity.
Here's my current side, feedback appreciated.
View attachment 818988
At a point now where I'm tired of chopping and changing. I think I'll call it here and keenly await the MCS for more clarity.
Here's my current side, feedback appreciated.
View attachment 818988
Nice team.
That Jacobs pick really allows the extra mid...hmm, something for me to think about, but I just can't trust him not to go about 70-80 this year