News 2020 St.Kilda Media Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

StCicatriz

Brownlow Medallist
Aug 3, 2016
20,516
40,091
AFL Club
St Kilda
GWS might be forced to offload one of their stars in the upcoming trade period as their salary cap tightens.

Superstar midfielder Josh Kelly is among the names generating speculation given his mega contract, with Saints and Dockers coach Ross Lyon stating the Giants ‘“have to make some really hard decisions” on their list.

Kelly comes out of contract at the end of 2021, with GWS having the option to trigger an extension of his reported $1 million-a-season deal.

It would see him stay with the Giants for a further eight year, while if the clause isn’t triggered, Kelly would be a free agent at the end of 2021.


Star duo Jeremy Cameron and Zac Williams have both been linked to several rival clubs, with the key duo out-of-contract at the end of the season.

Earlier this week coach Leon Cameron said the Giants were “confident he (Williams) is going to be a Giant for life” after “really good dialogue” between the club and Williams’ team.

He also indicated that his club could keep both Williams and Cameron.

“History says … their top five players, we will keep them, a free agency list. Look after the top and then just get role players in,” Lyon told Channel 9’s Footy Classified. “But Kelly sits in the star category, doesn’t he?

“They have to make some really hard decisions. Both Williams and Kelly, you wouldn’t want to lose either of them. I’m not sure how they’d make the decision.”

Kelly’s season has been inconsistent compared to previous years, which goes along with how GWS have performed in 2020.

The star Giant has averaged 22.2 disposals and 3.8 clearances per game, but will miss his side’s clash with Carlton on Thursday after suffering a heavy concussion after colliding into teammate Shane Mumford’s knee last week.

“He’s clearly playing more of an outside role on the wing, half forward, more than he previously has been when he was a Brownlow Medal contender as a midfielder,” Footy Classified co-host Sam McClure said on Channel 9.

“He’s an interesting part of their make-up for the list going forward.

“They’re so far over the salary cap, more than any other team. If Zac Williams doesn’t go and they keep him, they’re going to have to lose several – and one’s going to have to be a big fish.”

North Melbourne was very keen on signing Kelly back in 2017 before he eventually recommitted to the Giants. Kelly’s dad played 61 games for North in the early 1980s.

“There was talk about him going to his father’s club, North Melbourne,” Eddie McGuire said.

“They have more money than they can pay anyone at the moment, North, they have a great pick, Pick No. 2, in this draft, which is a pretty good draft.

“Would that be where they go to try and save some salary cap and get a young player in that doesn’t cost much who’s going to be a future star?”
Yes to Kelly but I suspect his pay cheque is massiveky inflated for his output now and GWS are onto it.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

NarklesHelmet

Premiership Player
Sep 17, 2010
4,797
16,533
AFL Club
St Kilda
Other Teams
Manchester City, AIK, Raiders
Why does this journo keep saying the following in the article:
“If the Saints beat the Giants in Round 18, they just need the Bulldogs to lose at least once to be sure of a return to finals.

They can also afford a loss to the Giants if they beat the Eagles, while seeing the Bulldogs lose at least once.

Am I missing something? We have a massive percentage advantage over the Dogs, why, if we win 1 game do we need them to lose one as well?
 

George

Moderator
Aug 17, 2015
20,117
65,029
Victoria
AFL Club
St Kilda
Other Teams
Philadelphia Eagles Liverpool
Why does this journo keep saying the following in the article:
“If the Saints beat the Giants in Round 18, they just need the Bulldogs to lose at least once to be sure of a return to finals.

They can also afford a loss to the Giants if they beat the Eagles, while seeing the Bulldogs lose at least once.

Am I missing something? We have a massive percentage advantage over the Dogs, why, if we win 1 game do we need them to lose one as well?
Because journalism.
 

Armitage2Riewoldt

Premium Gold
May 23, 2008
14,914
14,205
Melbourne
AFL Club
St Kilda
Why does this journo keep saying the following in the article:
“If the Saints beat the Giants in Round 18, they just need the Bulldogs to lose at least once to be sure of a return to finals.

They can also afford a loss to the Giants if they beat the Eagles, while seeing the Bulldogs lose at least once.

Am I missing something? We have a massive percentage advantage over the Dogs, why, if we win 1 game do we need them to lose one as well?
it’s far from enough to bank on. Eagles beat is by 8 goals tomorrow and dogs win by 6 goals it basically evaporates.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Winmar2Lockett

Norm Smith Medallist
Sep 14, 2008
5,885
18,529
The Bear Cave
AFL Club
St Kilda
Other Teams
Chicago Bulls
Kelly was choosing between GWS and North last time. We might have been in there, but ultimately his final choice was North vs GWS. No reason to think anything has changed there.
I don’t believe that was the case at all.

Besides would Kelly choose a club set for a long rebuild or a club that is on the verge of something special?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

jwikked

Premiership Player
Sep 20, 2009
4,079
11,560
NSW
AFL Club
St Kilda
“If I wasn’t in quarantine then I would probably put my hand up to play Round 18,” Hannebery told reporters at The Mercure Hotel.
That's a relief, for some reason I thought he'd reinjured himself somehow.

“The surgeon said there was a bit of funky stuff when he went in there. Fingers crossed that is the end of it. It has been that same area and same spot the whole time.”
Fingers crossed indeed.
 

Top Bottom