Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
i dont think he will go there anywayWhat an idiot B Crouch is. Geelong’s offer of 4 years for $800k is now off the table. We had pick 2 in the bag. Then this idiot went and bought a bag for himself.
What an idiot B Crouch is. Geelong’s offer of 4 years for $800k is now off the table. We had pick 2 in the bag. Then this idiot went and bought a bag for himself.
its not true anyway at cats because they dont pay oversI should mention I was told in the vincinity of $800k. And he still might end up at the Cats. But not on that money.
I don’t Geelong see it that way. They cling on to the hope every year that they can snag a flag by topping up.i dont think he will go there anyway
they need a rebuild. have a look at them - they are cooked and brad wont help "top up"
i think you are rightI don’t Geelong see it that way. They cling on to the hope every year that they can snag a flag by topping up.
That is absolutely the Geelong mantra. That is why they have the best win-loss history in the AFL. They have never finished lower than 12th. Despite their dominance, Eagles and Hawks have won more flags.I don’t Geelong see it that way. They cling on to the hope every year that they can snag a flag by topping up.
Where did the $800k for 4 years come from?.. and how do you know it is now off the table?..What an idiot B Crouch is. Geelong’s offer of 4 years for $800k is now off the table. We had pick 2 in the bag. Then this idiot went and bought a bag for himself.
Not sure the geelong football club would care about what their fans want..Go and have a read of the geelong trade board and you get a picture of the despair going on there at the repeated finals failures and then what supporters want. They dont want to keep the status quo of repeatedly topping up
Like north melbourne a few years ago. And we know how that ended upI don’t Geelong see it that way. They cling on to the hope every year that they can snag a flag by topping up.
They are also talking about bringing in Luke Bruest. Chris Scott can't accept that he is actually a s**t coach and they need to rebuild, so he will keep on topping up until the club sack him.I don’t Geelong see it that way. They cling on to the hope every year that they can snag a flag by topping up.
I don’t Geelong see it that way. They cling on to the hope every year that they can snag a flag by topping up.
They are also talking about bringing in Luke Bruest. Chris Scott can't accept that he is actually a sh*t coach and they need to rebuild, so he will keep on topping up until the club sack him.
Personally, I'd be surprised if it had any real impact on his value. I cannot remember Brad ever having an off field indiscretion before.Just wait until they get knocked out in the next week or two, suddenly Crouch will become a massive priority again and the drugs issue will become a "non-event".
Its interesting, Sam Edmund reckons he's spoken to the clubs interested in Crouch and the thought is his incident wont change much, mentioned that the clubs actually reached out to Brad to check on his mental health and reinforce their interest.
Damien Barrett on the other hand reckons it will cost him a lot of money, although doesn't actually claim to have spoken to anyone and is on record as thinking Brad is significantly over-rated (Wouldn't have paid pick 15 last year for him...).
Then you've got Kane Cornes off on his crusade against the Crows, likely to distract from "Jacky-Boys" little "indiscretion".
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. The key players for Brad appear to be Geelong, Richmond and Port, all of whom made top 4 and are likely more focused on finals at present. Just wait till a little panic sets in when 2-3 of these clubs miss finals, suddenly they'll be findings a few extra $100k a year to bring in a midfield free agent...
To be fair.. thats the way the whole system is set up for coaches..They are also talking about bringing in Luke Bruest. Chris Scott can't accept that he is actually a sh*t coach and they need to rebuild, so he will keep on topping up until the club sack him.
Well according to the *in filthy scumbag Purple..Personally, I'd be surprised if it had any real impact on his value. I cannot remember Brad ever having an off field indiscretion before.
That's good news for DMac lolMarc MacGowan on Twitter saying List size reduction will be minimal heading into next year. 42 players (38 and 4 Cat A Rookies), plus 2 Cat B rookies.
edit: I believe the changes gives flexibility to clubs on choosing the makeup of that core list of 42 players, eg I think clubs can have 40 on the main list, and only 2 Cat A rookies (plus 2 Cat B rookies)
Marc MacGowan on Twitter saying List size reduction will be minimal heading into next year. 42 players (38 and 4 Cat A Rookies), plus 2 Cat B rookies.
edit: I believe the changes gives flexibility to clubs on choosing the makeup of that core list of 42 players, eg I think clubs can have 40 on the main list, and only 2 Cat A rookies (plus 2 Cat B rookies)
Marc MacGowan on Twitter saying List size reduction will be minimal heading into next year. 42 players (38 and 4 Cat A Rookies), plus 2 Cat B rookies.
edit: I believe the changes gives flexibility to clubs on choosing the makeup of that core list of 42 players, eg I think clubs can have 40 on the main list, and only 2 Cat A rookies (plus 2 Cat B rookies)
IF...Well according to the fu**in filthy scumbag Purple..
View attachment 975441
The club should “be happy to move him on given his attitude over the PAST YEAR”!!.
WTF???.. one incident apparently now equals a whole year of bad attitude!..
How is this cu in the nt allowed to write this hysterical nonsense without losing his AFL accreditation?..
He probably gets a 2 year deal now, not just 1That's good news for DMac lol
Nah it'll be 1, nothing surerHe probably gets a 2 year deal now, not just 1