Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Just no to using a first on Higgins imo.Richmond used pick 17 in the 2017 draft for him and we may have to use ours to pry him off them. We would want Richmonds second rounder back next year.
Was chatting to a mate this morning who knows a fair bit about AFL and Trading and he's advised that trades can and will happen this week - don't be surprised to see some of these trades happen as late as Thursday and most (if not all) will involve current AFL players.
PM me if you want more info.

Just no to using a first on Higgins imo.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
For me, it's important to use pick 17 this year to tick off the first rounder requirement for the AFL.Depends on how you seeing him fit into our list. I see a potential gold mine. Like for like with Gresham at worst.
Is Pick 17 that valuable especially in a compromised draft due to covid? There's pros and cons i guess.
Would love Treloar and the longer it drags on the more likely I think we are.
Warming to the idea of Narkle on the cheap as well.
Really heating up on getting Robbie Muir back to the club to hand him the #32 jumper...
Depends on how you seeing him fit into our list. I see a potential gold mine. Like for like with Gresham at worst.
Is Pick 17 that valuable especially in a compromised draft due to covid? There's pros and cons i guess.
It’s not so valuable in the draft but more so that we have to use a first rounder either this year or next. And next year we are more likely to go for someone else...like Ben kingDepends on how you seeing him fit into our list. I see a potential gold mine. Like for like with Gresham at worst.
Is Pick 17 that valuable especially in a compromised draft due to covid? There's pros and cons i guess.
Not everyone is confident about it.Can i ask why everyone is so confident on Bing coming next year? Seems like its a bit of pipe dream doesnt it? All the reports were that he was going to see out his contract with the Suns and he is on enormous coin.
If we can get Narkle for one of our later picks or like next years 3rd rounder . I think that will be a good get .
We need to use a first to set ourselves up for next year and I certainly don’t rate him as worth a first.Depends on how you seeing him fit into our list. I see a potential gold mine. Like for like with Gresham at worst.
Is Pick 17 that valuable especially in a compromised draft due to covid? There's pros and cons i guess.
We need to use a first to set ourselves up for next year and I certainly don’t rate him as worth a first.
I like him he’d probably be handy for us but you can’t ignore the fact he’s not best 22 at Richmond and probably isn’t in ours just looking at it. If I wanted to trade a first I’d throw it at Stephenson, I really rate him and at 188 and lightening quick I’m backing him in to fire up at a new club especially after glandular fever knocked him around.
There are a lot of trades that need to get done and we don’t have a lot of capital at present so I think we’re in a wait and hope situation now.
PS. If we‘re looking at narkle then I think you can forget Higgins.
You stealing your material from Mr FlamingoWas chatting to a mate this morning who knows a fair bit about AFL and Trading and he's advised that trades can and will happen this week - don't be surprised to see some of these trades happen as late as Thursday and most (if not all) will involve current AFL players.
PM me if you want more info.
gringo2011 ?How long is it since the Saints have actually used our second round pick in the draft? Who was the last player we picked up in the second round?
Both are smallAny word on lonie/hind?
Just no to using a first on Higgins imo.
Im no massive stephenson fan but if higgins isn't coming cheap I'd rather roll the dice and pay a bit more and get stephenson.
The idea of getting higgins is to replace kent- which is ok if higgins comes cheap.
But if he doesn't then we may well be paying good money and trade currency to be bringing in another kent.
Higgins could be a gun or a bust- it's very 50/50.
Stephenson is i think a much higher chance of being an elite upgrade on kent at half forward.