Preview 2021 AFL National Draft | NM - #1, #20, #42, #47,#72, #77, #95

[giantroo]

Spoiler: Lore's 2021 Draft Order

 

[krakouers]

Or throwing one into shark infested waters like Jaws 4: The Revenge.

Your obsession with that movie is obvious, the thing is, does it have to come up in every thread?

 

[krakouers]

Puppies?

Yeah, them too

 

[The Filth Wizard]

Your obsession with that movie is obvious, the thing is, does it have to come up in every thread?

We're gonna need a bigger forum.

 

[krakouers]

We're gonna need a bigger forum.

I'll find them for three, but I'll catch them, and kill the thread, for ten

 

[Shinboner1]

Absolutely, I just wonder if there'd be less attachment to something not linked to position.

Has anyone traded to a pick 2 before?
What's the value like?
I assume we'd have to spend OVERS to get it done if at all possible.

 

[krakouers]

Has anyone traded to a pick 2 before?
What's the value like?
I assume we'd have to spend OVERS to get it done if at all possible.

Have we a Maverick Weller?

 

[The Filth Wizard]

Has anyone traded to a pick 2 before?
What's the value like?
I assume we'd have to spend OVERS to get it done if at all possible.

It's certainly mysterious. I guess the outlier is you're essentially picking at pick 4 if the status quo is kept.

 

[Shinboner1]

It's certainly mysterious. I guess the outlier is you're essentially picking at pick 4 if the status quo is kept.

But its really pick 2 considering darcy and daicos should never have been in your list considerations.

 

[DocSholl]

But its really pick 2 considering darcy and daicos should never have been in your list considerations.

Still the 4th best player in the pool though

 

[shinboner magic]

Still the 4th best player in the pool though

I wonder how the strength of this years players compare to last years

 

[The Filth Wizard]

I wonder how the strength of this years players compare to last years

Well there's only one answer for that.

Strongman contest. And you're going to help me run it.

 

[krakouers]

Well there's only one answer for that.

Strongman contest. And you're going to help me run it.

Oh The Filth Wizard …
You should card yourself for that

 

[shinboner magic]

Well there's only one answer for that.

Strongman contest. And you're going to help me run it.

First will Phillips v JHF intraclub contest

 

[The Filth Wizard]

Oh The Filth Wizard …
You should card yourself for that

I'm not going to feel bad for trying to spend some more time with shinboner magic.

 

[remfan101]

Still the 4th best player in the pool though

Interestingly, I’ve heard a few people (Cal Twomney among them) mention that next year’s crop is seen as stronger at the top than this years, and clubs have been attempting trading into the ‘22 draft.

If that is the case, GWS might be more willing to swap the 4th best player in a weaker pool for what they would anticipate is a top 3 pick in a stronger (and less compromised) draft.

 

[deano28]

Still the 4th best player in the pool though

Depending on where you rate Darcy , opinion on him is variable. Some have him at 3 & others have him in the 6-8 range . Safe to say though he will be bid on at 3 regardless.

 

[DocSholl]

Depending on where you rate Darcy , opinion on him is variable. Some have him at 3 & others have him in the 6-8 range . Safe to say though he will be bid on at 3 regardless.

Yeah it's variable, but saying that father sons don't count when talking about pick trades because they're not available anyway is a bit simplistic. If Adelaide put pick 4 up for trade and a team rated Daicos and Darcy in the top three, then they're effectively trading in pick 6 on their draft board. Another club might rate both outside the top four so the pick is more valuable to them.

 

[Liam Boy]

Interestingly, I’ve heard a few people (Cal Twomney among them) mention that next year’s crop is seen as stronger at the top than this years, and clubs have been attempting trading into the ‘22 draft.

If that is the case, GWS might be more willing to swap the 4th best player in a weaker pool for what they would anticipate is a top 3 pick in a stronger (and less compromised) draft.

are GWS allowed to trade a pick that's already been traded to them as a future pick?

 

[Kangaroos techno]

Could we get Pick 2 so we can on trade to Richmond in a mega pick swap / CCJ deal to get us pick 7 and 15? Might be a way to get the types we want like Gibcus and a HB this year?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Bugger that because it'd get knocked down to 9 and 17 for a pick 2.

If it was Gibcus I'd see adelaide and swap:
4, 23, 37 for 2, 69

- Walk CCJ to the PSD
- Walk into the draft with 1 (Horne), 4 (Gibcus), 20 (NWM) 21 (priority pick - Wilmont), 23 (Alleer), 37 (small forward), 38 (small forward)

I'd prefer we just got Callaghan (meaning we ignore adelaide) and then added Darcy Moore as a free agent next year. Then we don't need Gibcus.

 

[Psicosis]

Would people prefer:

Option 1 - P1 JHF, P20 Bhazzo/Van Rooyen (KPD) & retain 2022 first round pick (no trade)

Option 2 - P1 JHF, P2 Gibcus, Trade P20 & 2022 first round pick

Option 3 - P1 JHF, P2 Callaghan, Trade P20 & 2022 first round pick

 

[DaveyBoy123]

Would people prefer:

Option 1 - P1 JHF, P20 Bhazzo/Van Rooyen (KPD) & retain 2022 first round pick (no trade)

Option 2 - P1 JHF, P2 Gibcus, Trade P20 & 2022 first round pick

Option 3 - P1 JHF, P2 Callaghan, Trade P20 & 2022 first round pick

If you could guarantee me 1 of JVR or RB, then I'd take Option 1.

It's obviously really difficult to judge where the Vic juniors are at in comparison though.

 

[Luke72]

Would people prefer:

Option 1 - P1 JHF, P20 Bhazzo/Van Rooyen (KPD) & retain 2022 first round pick (no trade)

Option 2 - P1 JHF, P2 Gibcus, Trade P20 & 2022 first round pick

Option 3 - P1 JHF, P2 Callaghan, Trade P20 & 2022 first round pick

I’d say option 1, however if we were of the belief we would get a first round compo pick next year I could understand trading. Hopefully Laura Kane can swing her influence inside AFL house.

 

[The Filth Wizard]

Would people prefer:

Option 1 - P1 JHF, P20 Bhazzo/Van Rooyen (KPD) & retain 2022 first round pick (no trade)

Option 2 - P1 JHF, P2 Gibcus, Trade P20 & 2022 first round pick

Option 3 - P1 JHF, P2 Callaghan, Trade P20 & 2022 first round pick

1 and at a stretch 3. 2 should never be a consideration, you don't gamble on defenders.

 

[buttox]

Would people prefer:

Option 1 - P1 JHF, P20 Bhazzo/Van Rooyen (KPD) & retain 2022 first round pick (no trade)

Option 2 - P1 JHF, P2 Gibcus, Trade P20 & 2022 first round pick

Option 3 - P1 JHF, P2 Callaghan, Trade P20 & 2022 first round pick

1.
Pick 20 is to good for steak knives.

 

[Shinboner1]

are GWS allowed to trade a pick that's already been traded to them as a future pick?

yes as long as they dont try to trade it back to collingwood.