- Sep 4, 2003
- AFL Club
- Other Teams
- Balmain, GreenBay, Edmonton, Celtic
I'm going to be a bit careful on Freo in the 1st game. They suffered a number of injuries in the warm up game this weekend to key players.All over Port line, I got it at -24 but still like it at -27.5 at 365. North are a rabble and Port should destroy them.
Also a fan of Freo +14.5, Walters likely to miss is a big loss but I really like what they are building and they have some seriously impressive depth through their midfield and half-back lines. Melbourne have not been able to score for 2 seasons and I personally think Freo are a good chance of winning this game so happy to take over a two goal handicap
Just curious why you didnt include the Tigers and Eagles in your multi? You have doubt about them and or their opponents may push them all the way?Three leg lock multi
3u - Geelong, Brisbane, Port - $1.90 - 365
Confident in wins from these three side. Locking them in and riding them home.
I like the two of them. Just waiting for the right time to bet them. Waiting for other markets to appear and see what there is on offer.Just curious why you didnt include the Tigers and Eagles in your multi? You have doubt about them and or their opponents may push them all the way?
I’d have to actually look into it, but I think teams are leased inclined to thump their opponents in round 1. It’s a long season, and the best players won’t over exert themselves and risk injury demolishing a team. You can probably make even more of a case for it this year with the shortened pre season and the high amount of injuries that have been cited so far.Isn’t there always upsets round 1? Port last year was it against Melbourne? Or was that 2 years ago, think Essendon are value, if we can’t beat this hawthorn side we never will.
will wait for teams, but port 39+ looks good also
One team has significantly improved while one has lost some key depth imo.I wouldn’t be underestimating Collingwood. I thought they weren't too bad against the tiges & will get Mihocek back up fwd. If Naughton doesn’t get up, the dogs are at a massive disadvantage & are chips in on Bruce.
Pies absolutely towelled them up Rd 1 lst year too.
Port, Cats & Tiges lines look the goods to me & Ess 6.5 dogs looks pretty solid too.
If Sidey & Adams don’t get up I’ll be all over the dogs, but other than Treloar how have the dogs significantly improved from the side that lost an elim final to Stk? I just don’t get the hype.One team has significantly improved while one has lost some key depth imo.
Collingwood have a stout defence, but Dogs have a clear edge in the midfield and Collingwood just don't have a threatening forward line. Sidebottom was apparently a 50/50 chance only a couple of days ago, so that's a further big loss if he misses.
How have Dogs improved? Bruce and Keath with another year in the system. Should benefit greatly from the new rules. Stef Martin in so Grundy doesn't destroy English + Dunkley isn't the 2nd ruck and Treloar makes a fantastic midfield even better.If Sidey & Adams don’t get up I’ll be all over the dogs, but other than Treloar how have the dogs significantly improved from the side that lost an elim final to Stk? I just don’t get the hype.