Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree. But necessity is the mother of invention.He will be a star as a small forward, he's too important there.
I agree. But necessity is the mother of invention.
With Papley, Gulden, Wicks, Sheather and possibly Cambell rolling through there, it is not an impossible scenario.
I am liking our list more and more each year with its youth and flexibility.
Look at Blakey. Started as FF, then said he was a mid and now is starring at HB.
Never rule anything out.
I think too that there is a risk that too many draftees might not get games early enough. Needs to be considered carefully alongside what is available this year and next year from the Academy.I just don't think we have the list spots to facilitate bringing in more than 3 kids in the draft.
Papley at centre bounces has been tried with success. I just never rule anything out.I guess with Blakey it's different because he wasn't very promising in all the other positions he played in. So we had to try him elsewhere or there was a very good chance he'd have ended up a bust. Whereas Wicks is already in a position and role where he's shown he can be one of the best in the competition. So if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
So sorry rusty, I'm ruling this one out
Sometimes if you don't explore the question out loud you can never arrive at a decision in your mind. I think we do have those players on our list. Our draft capital is better spent elsewhere. We have more pressing needs. It's been a good discussion.Unpopular opinion but I don't think we'd be all that screwed without a specialist small defender in our 22. We have enough generalists who can play small
Ok. I'll rephrase it. In my opinion he fails to hit the target MORE often than not.It’s not an opinion. “As often as not” is 50% of the time...no more no less. You are wrong on this.
If he isn't already I think he is a future star. Him and Paley cause havoc up front. Wicks has that small man mongrel but he also has that bit of class. Some of his lead up to goals are just amazing.
180cm isn't really that short. Draft Central, who I usually regard as the most reliable of draft-related sources (they had Errol at 20 last year, which is where I had him), have Taylor at 25. They also haven't done an extensive overview of him as a prospect, like they normally do, where they cover weaknesses and areas of improvement etc. So as of now it's a mystery to why he would be ranked fairly low despite the rave summary.
The classy smaller midfielder just finds the footy and knows what to do with it. He averaged 26 disposals in Calder's NAB League season and he also produced some big games, including a 37-disposal and 11-clearance outing. His kicking stands out: Taylor rarely misses a target and simply makes good decisions.
Draftcentral overview on Taylor is now up.
Zac Taylor
afl.draftcentral.com.au
It lists his two areas of improvements as strength and inside game.
Just a reminder of Cal Twomey's appraisal;
Obviously at 74kg it would be a step up at AFL level, but he appears to have the tools and understanding to get his hands on the ball.
Yet to see a bad review of him and any indication of a substantial weakness, other than reference to his size (height & weight).
And I'll just post this again.
There is talent on display.
Always a matter of when, not ifWicks commits to the Swans
There's no place like home. Local product and lively forward Sam Wicks has signed a two year contract with the Swans.www.sydneyswans.com.au
Wicks signs on for two more years.
it obviously on the optimistic side of things, but there are examples of key defenders performing at an early stage of their career. Also thinking that hopefully there are slightly older players like Harry Taylor floating around in the vfl/wafl etcNo chance imo, if you want a regular KPD by 2023 you have to trade one in. Most take a minimum of three years.
Yep, I don't get the "I know we have a hole in defence now or very near future (while every other line looks decent at least), but don't worry we'll bring in a big gun or best-22 mature age rookie, so don't need to draft anyone" stance. We have tried and failed with Darcy Moore, we brought in Brand but he's now gone. People have question marks over Melican, BOC, Gould etc making it (I agree). Paddy McCartin is far from a given (not even on the list yet).it obviously on the optimistic side of things, but there are examples of key defenders performing at an early stage of their career. Also thinking that hopefully there are slightly older players like Harry Taylor floating around in the vfl/wafl etc
Not a fan of taking a small forward this year. Would prefer Sheldrick who went to the very next selection
I just don't think we have the list spots to facilitate bringing in more than 3 kids in the draft.
We need to draft one now because in 5 years time we will be in the same position.I don't think we can afford to draft a KPD and wait 5 years for them to develop (unless they're a freak it's going to take that long, at least). Unless they're mature aged, we'll have to trade. Not sure how we ended up in this position, especially considering McCartin was a forward.
Injuries to Melican and probably also the likes of Maibaum, I suspect. We have been pretty sparse back there since Grundy retired though.I don't think we can afford to draft a KPD and wait 5 years for them to develop (unless they're a freak it's going to take that long, at least). Unless they're mature aged, we'll have to trade. Not sure how we ended up in this position, especially considering McCartin was a forward.
I don't think we'll take Van Rooyen with our first pick like a lot here link us to. More than likely we'll use our first 2 to pickup the best midfielder available, pick 3 we can still grab someone like Charlie Dean. Then rookie spot McCartin. We're also resigning Reid and most assume he'll be playing in defence
Would mean our tall defenders are:
Reid
McCartin
McCartin
Melican
Dean