- Aug 12, 2017
- 3,957
- 7,092
- AFL Club
- GWS
No early bid on Fahey so banked points for next year
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
SOABPlease get Howes AND Fahey
Because he’s a beatnik?Draper didn’t interview well.
They are a bit slowHaha ... bulldogs get their sweet revenge for the Darcy bid ... albeit 40 picks later
Do tell?Draper didn’t interview well.
Not sure. The BF spreadsheet seems to have removed all of our picks except #89, which isn't right.What’s our next pick after we matched?
Ahh cheersNot sure. The BF spreadsheet seems to have removed all of our picks except #89, which isn't right.
The bid at #42 needed 198 points to match, and we had #47 which was 316 points, so we should have a surplus of 118 points, which would be #63. We previously had #63 - so we should still have a pick at that point (even if one disappears because we only have the one list spot remaining).
Do we need another KPD? I'd have said we're OK having picked up Leek Aleer - I'd only consider picking up another KPD in the PSSP to cover the two LTIs as a short-term measure.How about Dean as a mature agent?
Anyone have a preferance for which small forward we should go after tomorrow?
Not a huge preference, no.Anyone have a preferance for which small forward we should go after tomorrow?
Gibbons, Lonie and Hanrahan I think for the most partWhat are the options?