Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey, I hope he comes out and proves everyone wrong. No fan should be actively hoping our players fail so good luck to him. IMO ROC had even fewer opportunities and I would have rather seen him given another go if that's the approach we are taking.Look at the chances he’s had, you can complain about the years on the list but the opportunities and way he’s been treated have been a joke.
We don't have the youngest list at all, let alone by a country mile. North's list is younger, by a massive 0.12 years (average).
Yes, it was flagged early, to prepare us for the bad news. That doesn't make it a good idea, or even a fair idea. It was a bad decision, a dog eating its own vomit.
Great movie! Bad visuals for poor Ben though.The only thing that re-listing Davis does is cost us a SPP/ mid season draft selection if no one else is on the long term injury list.
Obscure reference, but I remember the scene in Escape to Victory where they broke the current goal keeper's arm so that they could bring Sylvester Stallone. I hope Ben's been asked to watch that movie as part of bringing him back on. We'll make it a clean break, Ben.
Or we can invest in a guy who plays a similar role, is 4 years younger, 10cm taller, just as talented and agile. Josh Worrell.That was 2020 preseason, he played in the preseason matches, played it against Swans rd 1 and earned coaches votes. Only to never get a game after the covid resumption until late 2021. If ever a players been mismanaged it’s Davis. He should have played a number of games by name so we knew one way or another.
Did he play well enough to get another game after the Sydney game? Yes, he earned coaches votesHas he been beating the door down at sanfl level? No.
Averaged 8.8 disposals *Showed something toward the end of season playing in defence, that's why.
He was the medical sub in a few of those games and come on in the last quarter and looked very good when he got the ball.Averaged 8.8 disposals *
5/2
1/3
11/3
3/7
Haha exactly , people who are biased will just make stuff upHe was the medical sub in a few of those games and when he got the ball he looked very good.
I guess if looking good was a football criteria *He was the medical sub in a few of those games and come on in the last quarter and looked very good when he got the ball.
It's not making stuff up if it's his statsHaha exactly , people who are biased will just make stuff up
I’m more concerned Re Billy being on list than Ben
Looked good in a position he hasn't played, clearly you didn't watch him closely unlike the coaches.I guess if looking good was a football criteria *
Check his possession per TOGIt's not making stuff up if it's his stats
FTFYDefinitely. The list is building nicely. A couple more pre seasons under Burgess and hopefully Hollands next year and things will turn very quickly.
Pedlar
We don't have the youngest list at all, let alone by a country mile. North's list is younger, by a massive 0.12 years (average).
Yes, it was flagged early, to prepare us for the bad news. That doesn't make it a good idea, or even a fair idea. It was a bad decision, a dog eating its own vomit.
We don't have the youngest list at all, let alone by a country mile. North's list is younger, by a massive 0.12 years (average).
Yes, it was flagged early, to prepare us for the bad news. That doesn't make it a good idea, or even a fair idea. It was a bad decision, a dog eating its own vomit.
I guess if looking good was a football criteria *
posted on the main board - look at our forward line that is building - and ALL young with years ahead of themWe have a really young list and I am grateful that Nicks is leading that
The negative useless incompetent gooses have largely gone
Let’s feel some hope
I do