List Mgmt. 2021 Draft Picks part deux: 4/33/75

[Deaneus!]

thanks to Lore as always

AFL Draft Pick Value Calculator - Draftguru

 

[Kane Johnson]

Look at the chances he’s had, you can complain about the years on the list but the opportunities and way he’s been treated have been a joke.

Hey, I hope he comes out and proves everyone wrong. No fan should be actively hoping our players fail so good luck to him. IMO ROC had even fewer opportunities and I would have rather seen him given another go if that's the approach we are taking.

 

[Jars458]

We don't have the youngest list at all, let alone by a country mile. North's list is younger, by a massive 0.12 years (average).

Yes, it was flagged early, to prepare us for the bad news. That doesn't make it a good idea, or even a fair idea. It was a bad decision, a dog eating its own vomit.

When did you turn into a drama merchant? Really over the top.

 

[Jars458]

The only thing that re-listing Davis does is cost us a SPP/ mid season draft selection if no one else is on the long term injury list.

Obscure reference, but I remember the scene in Escape to Victory where they broke the current goal keeper's arm so that they could bring Sylvester Stallone. I hope Ben's been asked to watch that movie as part of bringing him back on. We'll make it a clean break, Ben.

Great movie! Bad visuals for poor Ben though.

 

[Thetrader15]

That was 2020 preseason, he played in the preseason matches, played it against Swans rd 1 and earned coaches votes. Only to never get a game after the covid resumption until late 2021. If ever a players been mismanaged it’s Davis. He should have played a number of games by name so we knew one way or another.

Or we can invest in a guy who plays a similar role, is 4 years younger, 10cm taller, just as talented and agile. Josh Worrell.

 

[George Kramer]

Has he been beating the door down at sanfl level? No.

Did he play well enough to get another game after the Sydney game? Yes, he earned coaches votes

 

[CrowinNT]

Thank you all for the laughs last 2 nights especially as the draft occurred
I really did munch the Christmas Cake as it got boring. Prior I had written childish notes on it as hubby is a muncher of the night
I was the culprit that broke the rule haha and wrapped it in alfoil but he spotted it
The Paul’s Brandy custard I don’t recommend

 

[GreyCrow]

Showed something toward the end of season playing in defence, that's why.

Averaged 8.8 disposals *

5/2
1/3
11/3
3/7

 

[ABAB]

Averaged 8.8 disposals *

5/2
1/3
11/3
3/7

He was the medical sub in a few of those games and come on in the last quarter and looked very good when he got the ball.

 

[Jeffcrowe]

He was the medical sub in a few of those games and when he got the ball he looked very good.

Haha exactly , people who are biased will just make stuff up
I’m more concerned Re Billy being on list than Ben

 

[GreyCrow]

He was the medical sub in a few of those games and come on in the last quarter and looked very good when he got the ball.

I guess if looking good was a football criteria *

 

[GreyCrow]

Haha exactly , people who are biased will just make stuff up
I’m more concerned Re Billy being on list than Ben

It's not making stuff up if it's his stats

 

[ABAB]

I guess if looking good was a football criteria *

Looked good in a position he hasn't played, clearly you didn't watch him closely unlike the coaches.

 

[Jeffcrowe]

It's not making stuff up if it's his stats

Check his possession per TOG

 

[Scorpus]

Pedlar

Draftguru had him at 183

 

[Carmo]

Definitely. The list is building nicely. A couple more pre seasons under Burgess and hopefully Hollands next year and things will turn very quickly.

FTFY

 

[adelaidecrows]

Anyone else think that Hamish could have scored a perfect 4/4?

The fact we were able to pick up 3 mids rated in the top 30 plus Nankervis just has a very good vibe about it.

 

[Danger Zone]

Pedlar

Listed at 182 or 183 depending on where you look (split the diff and say 182.5?), so would be right on the edge. He doesn't exactly seem short with the way he plays though so I personally probably wouldn't include him in that list.

 

[adelaidecrows]

We don't have the youngest list at all, let alone by a country mile. North's list is younger, by a massive 0.12 years (average).

Yes, it was flagged early, to prepare us for the bad news. That doesn't make it a good idea, or even a fair idea. It was a bad decision, a dog eating its own vomit.

we probably do have close to the youngest if you remove Walker and Sloane's age. Anyways the average age only really matters if you hit the high 23s and 24s plus. Being we would be one of the lowest, well its not a competition. As long as we develop our players well and pump games into them.

 

[relapse]

We don't have the youngest list at all, let alone by a country mile. North's list is younger, by a massive 0.12 years (average).

Yes, it was flagged early, to prepare us for the bad news. That doesn't make it a good idea, or even a fair idea. It was a bad decision, a dog eating its own vomit.

Actually that's not completely true

You got your info from draft guru, but that hasn't been updated with today's picks where North took Polec which will bump up their average age while we took Nankervis which will further lower ours.

Once it's updated we'll still be the youngest list in the AFL, just not by as much as I thought.

 

[CrowinNT]

We have a really young list and I am grateful that Nicks is leading that
The negative useless incompetent gooses have largely gone
Let’s feel some hope
I do

 

[BRL121]

I guess if looking good was a football criteria *

Criterion, mate: get it right!

 

[1990crow]

I'm not overly interested in getting a list to copycat Melbourne or Richmond. Trends come and go, it's up to a new team to set the standard for other clubs to copy.

By the time we have a list of players at the same body shape as either of these teams in their prime, the trend would be well and truly over.

 

[Crow till I die]

We have a really young list and I am grateful that Nicks is leading that
The negative useless incompetent gooses have largely gone
Let’s feel some hope
I do

posted on the main board - look at our forward line that is building - and ALL young with years ahead of them

Thilthorpe - pick 2 (R1) - key forward
Fogarty - pick 12 (R1) - lead up forward
Rachele - pick 6 (R1) - small x factor forward
Cook - pick 25 (R1) - x factor medium forward
McHenry - pick 16 (R1) - small presure forward / mid
Gollant - later pick - mid size marking forward

Maybe end of next year - Rankine can be added to that

The trick will be getting the quality we have in the middle and on the flanks to be able to match it with the best - then we can be really dangerous.

An open question. With the way our list is building and what we have done back of house culturally and in terms of getting guys like Burgo in etc, how long before we pass port on their way down and correct that showdown imbalance for years to come

 

[Stiffy_18]

Anyone else noticed a high number of absolutely s**t haircuts amongs the draftees this year?

WTF is up with that?!

 

[simmo97]

We currently have only a First and second round Pick in the 2022 draft.

Round 3 pick was traded to Melbourne
Round 4 pick was traded to St Kilda