Lore
Moderator ❀
- Dec 14, 2015
- 48,904
- 73,289
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Moderator
- #203
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
15,27,28 for saints pick 9 ?
7,9,26 ?
Keep in mind i'm going of that ESPN post and we land Ward and Hobbs
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
That's massive overs for only a 6 spot increase15,27,28 for saints pick 9 ?
7,9,26 ?
Keep in mind i'm going of that ESPN post and we land Ward and Hobbs
That depends on who your dealing with.As I said unless we got a deal that we can't refuse I would take our picks this year. No point trading a mid 20s pick this year for a possible mid 30s pick next year.
Yeah they do thats why i added another second rounder in 28 so one will getting eaten by NGA and they still have one right ?Don't saints have NGA players to match? not entirely sure where they land but they could make second round picks pretty useless for the saints unless they are short on points.
We give up Pick 15 (17), 26 and future second for pick 9 (11)?
Having picks 9 and 11 would a great result
don't care about "points" if that means us landing a brighter talentThat's massive overs for only a 6 spot increase
Just 15 & 27 should be enough for that
Interesting in that scenario.What would we give up for Pick 9?If we got Ward and Hobbs that would be perfect. Helps out future team rebuild and allows us to have some depth next year that can push RCD and Dow for selection. Hopefully replace Aarts, Pickett
It would be hard to prise 9 from the Saints, they're a bit toey about an early bid for Owens, they might go for 15 and one of our 2nds next year but TBH I think that we'd keep our draft capital for now and see what pans out on the nightInteresting in that scenario.What would we give up for Pick 9?
Food for thought though.Hobbs & Ward.
His partner in crime is Mani Liddy.i've been re-watching the Sopranos, I'm pretty certain Arlo Draper is a gangster out of Newark...
Give them #15 + #28 and tell them to piss off , They need picks more than anybody and wont get a better deal anywhereIt would be hard to prise 9 from the Saints, they're a bit toey about an early bid for Owens, they might go for 15 and one of our 2nds next year but TBH I think that we'd keep our draft capital for now and see what pans out on the night
That injury though was a ten week hammy on an 18yo fast kid. Not a great sign.If Sinn gets through to our second pick I would hope we take a good look even if JVR is still on the board. If not for injury there's every chance he could have had the early games that Callahan did and be a top five prospect (as he was considered coming into this year)
None of the rebuilding sides are going to offer up a deal that is too good to refuse.That depends on who your dealing with.
Let’s get 5 ordinary players and give them a challenge.Let’s get five talented kids with the right attitude and let our culture and our football department do their thing…
Your right i think.It would be hard to prise 9 from the Saints, they're a bit toey about an early bid for Owens, they might go for 15 and one of our 2nds next year but TBH I think that we'd keep our draft capital for now and see what pans out on the night
So you reckon a bloke with the name F.Lakey would be a good bet ? He's all yours dude.What are the chances of Flynn Lakey getting picked up ??
For sure, a similar argument could be made for 26-27-28. All the talk is that the draft is very even around that 10-30 mark with quite a bit of depth after that, so our ability to cherry pick is outstandingYour right i think.
But its so tempting to do a deal of somekind if both were @ 7.lol
Ward, Hobbs and Bazzo. We would make off like bandits. Then do the same again next year.15,27,28 for saints pick 9 ?
7,9,26 ?
Keep in mind i'm going of that ESPN post and we land Ward and Hobbs
Its all about the uncertainty of this year.None of the rebuilding sides are going to offer up a deal that is too good to refuse.
So that takes out North Hawks Crows Pies. Suns traded heavily into next year already so that counts them out as well. Carlton may be desperate enough to do something, but I reckon they have finally worked out trading future picks out is a disaster given their ability to continually fail. Saints will want to keep their picks to launch a run at King. Same with Essendon who are reportedly hunting King as well. That leaves sides that we're thereabouts for the finals this year. Fremantle have steadily improved under Longmuir, so could sneak into the 8. The rest of them should again be in the mix, so trading say 28 for one of their future 2nds isn't a deal that is too good to refuse. Now if one of them offer up their 2022 first you'd think we'd consider it depending on who was available at that time, if there are a couple of first round sliders on the board I'd suggest it is unlikely we trade, however if all our targets are gone then maybe it gets done.
You're trading into a draft where the 16 year olds from 2 years ago have had less development put into them than the kids available this year.Its all about the uncertainty of this year.
Hell even the full time guru's are all over the shop.
I'd trade one of our 2nds for a future 2nd in a heart beat to a side that more than likely will still be around that 28 pick mark next year or if we go out to 31ish then even thats a good deal on the basis we know more of what we're getting next year than this year.
Will be interesting Draft night thats for sure.For sure, a similar argument could be made for 26-27-28. All the talk is that the draft is very even around that 10-30 mark with quite a bit of depth after that, so our ability to cherry pick is outstanding
But they'll get 12 mnths more development next year than the current crop who have had what 6 games amongst their peers in the past 2yrs not to mention the Champs.You're trading into a draft where the 16 year olds from 2 years ago have had less development put into them than the kids available this year.