Lore
Moderator ❀
- Dec 14, 2015
- 48,919
- 73,331
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Moderator
- #203
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
This would drop Mac Andrews stocks.According to SEN next years draft a cracker for 200cm plus talls. 12 players already on recruiters radars
Yeah not sure how far he drops (if at all) but I wouldn’t be reaching for a tall early unless they rate Gibcus best available at our first.This would drop Mac Andrews stocks.
might mean he could fall to mid teens. Makes trading up 26&28 potentially very valuable.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Richmond chasing St Kildas pick 9 according to a mate of mine. He reckobs Saints have no picks after 9 and need to get some depth in their picks for the draft.
do they agree to 26+28 for 9? probably not I reckonour two seconds for aints first is the only way I see that getting done
do they agree to 26+28 for 9? probably not I reckon
do they agree to 26+28 for 9? probably not I reckon
They’ll want 15 or a future first + one of the 20’s picks
11 for 28 & 30 (after bids) is pretty close on points (1329 vs 1306)Richmond chasing St Kildas pick 9 according to a mate of mine. He reckobs Saints have no picks after 9 and need to get some depth in their picks for the draft.
He was right about balta
Also ranked Reece McKenzie in his top 10.
i feel points are only relevant for F/S and the drop in quality players from 11 to 28,30 is big in some drafts.11 for 28 & 30 (after bids) is pretty close on points (1329 vs 1306)
i feel points are only relevant for F/S and the drop in quality players from 11 to 28,30 is big in some drafts.
i feel points are only relevant for F/S and the drop in quality players from 11 to 28,30 is big in some drafts.
I would chuck in 38 as well to make it worthwhile for them. Give them 3 shots at it we get 9 to take
7 9 15 and 26 on draft night night. Saints get 3 picks inside 40 which is much better than what they have now.
I would chuck in 38 as well to make it worthwhile for them. Give them 3 shots at it we get 9 to take
7 9 15 and 26 on draft night night. Saints get 3 picks inside 40 which is much better than what they have now.
They have 2 NGA players who they need points for this year also.Saints will want an extra 1st rounder next year to make a play for King.
I reckon they would go for something like the below,
Pick 9 to us
Pick 28, next years first and maybe a token late pick this year
Not sure if I would do it, probably would, but I am a deal whore.
According to your mate you say? Well lock that shit in then.Richmond chasing St Kildas pick 9 according to a mate of mine. He reckobs Saints have no picks after 9 and need to get some depth in their picks for the draft.
Why the angst? No need to get angry. Just passing on what he said. Itll be hilarious if it happens tomorrow.According to your mate you say? Well lock that sh*t in then.
Richmond chasing St Kildas pick 9 according to a mate of mine. He reckobs Saints have no picks after 9 and need to get some depth in their picks for the draft.
I would do that in about 3 seconds11 for 28 & 30 (after bids) is pretty close on points (1329 vs 1306)