Lore
Moderator ❀
- Dec 14, 2015
- 48,902
- 73,286
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Moderator
- #203
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Would take Rachele in a heartbeat. Would be an upgrade on George.
On what basis could you come to that conclusion? Andrew is rated a top five to ten pick and biggie wasn’t rated anywhere near that.
No its not.LOL - that's racist dude.
Good post.Do I need my sarcasm filter again. I got caught out a few weeks ago with this.
But if you are serious, I also made this comment a while back. I think when commenting on a particular race as having above average athletic skills, I am not sure it is wrong. It is generalising, but these tall African players that reach the State level, have similar traits. We've seen Marbs, but I haven't seen any of Biggie.
I think it's a fair question due to similar physical attributes. The point on Andrew though is his rating as an 18 y.o. Seems he is way ahead of Biggie at the same time. But can Biggie make quick development and reach the Allir Allir level?
I think taking Andrew is a mutually exclusive decision though.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Obviously never heard of racial profiling. Poor comment.![]()
Bigger Faster more agile Dylan Grimes in 2-3 years time![]()
It's totally different, both those players were highly rated juniors so to compare them (as juniors) makes sense. Andrew is way higher rated than Biggie, a better comparison would be to say Andrew is like Tim English.No its not.
Its no different if i was comparing Dusty too Kmart Dusty.
Does English get off the ground?It's totally different, both those players were highly rated juniors so to compare them (as juniors) makes sense. Andrew is way higher rated than Biggie, a better comparison would be to say Andrew is like Tim English.
totally different players. One bad year and we’re throwing out a three time premiership player out for an untested, undrafted 180 cm marking forward
We have Nank;
Soldo coming back from a major knee reco after only just establishing himself as a senior player;
Ryan who has played one game and looked completely out of his depth; and
A basketballer that hasn't played a game for 5 years.
So respectfully to say we don't need another ruck is wrong.
We have 4 rucks on the list. Nank is at least B+ grade. Soldo has shown similar level talent - different style, complimentary with Nank. Ryan is raw as all get out, but the club sees him having a high level talent. Mate is obviously very very raw. But huge and talented by all accounts.
Every ruck beyond your depth position is excess. That is, if you have too many rucks, you basically can't play them.
So I'm happy with 4 rucks on our list.
I think some underrate how hard it is to get absolute guns to your club if you think a prospect has it. We where lucky to get Dusty at three thanks to Melb
Nahhh he's a lap-dog not a spring heeler...Does English get off the ground?
Yea , biggie is a long term investment I sure hope we secure him once again . Has the tools to be a very good player. Will take time thoughGood post.
Andrew may become a better player than Biggie but how much better?
Both have similar traits.Agile/Athletic/Tall/Spring etc.
Both are long term projects.
I just don't think paying for a 1st rnd on a project player that may end very similar to the project player we already have on the list.
Keyser Soze ?
People always say best available yet would overlook Andrews due to 28 year old bank. Soldo off a knee And Ryan? ...
On the Lystics AFL Podcast episode they did an AFL Mock Draft for the 1st round:
#1. North - Jason Horne-Francis
#2. WB - Sam Darcy (Rich Bid)
#3. Coll - Daicos (Rich Bid)
#4. Rich - Finn Callaghan
We traded with GWS:
Rich give: #7,#15 & 2022 Rich 2nd Round
Rich receive: #2 and GWS 2022 3rd Round
We then tried to trade #2 and a pick in the #20s for Freos #6 & #8 but didn't go through.
#5. GC - Josh Gibcus
#6. Crows - Josh Rachele
#7. Hawks - Jye Amiss
#8. Freo - Neil Erasmus
#9. GWS - Mac Andrew
GWS get #10 & #20
Freo get #15 & #17 & #45
#10. GWS - Josh Sinn
#11. Saints - Ben Hobbs
#12. WC - Matthew Johnson
#13. Essendon - Josh Goater
Rich get #14 & #55
Port get #26 & #27
#14. Rich - Josh Ward
#15. Freo - Jacob Van Rooyen
#16. Bris - Nasiah Wanganeen-Milera
#17. Freo - Tyler Sonsie
#18. Swans - Mitch Knevitt
#19. Melb - Arlo Draper
#20. Bris - Darcy Wilmot
If we managed to jag Callaghan and Ward (ward doesnt make it to pick 14 in any world) we would have our midfield set for the next 10 years.
This is pure fantasy and completely jizz worthy
If we managed to jag Callaghan and Ward (ward doesnt make it to pick 14 in any world) we would have our midfield set for the next 10 years.
This is pure fantasy and completely jizz worthy
would love those two but damn we're giving up a lot.
7, 15, 26, 27 and our future 2nd for Callaghan, Ward & pick 55
going by that order an alternative haul might be something like Hobbs, Sonsie, McDonald, Bazzo, Howes and a future 2nd. hmmm
I'd be more inclined to play the numbers game and stick with our current picks. Particularly given that fully proven AFL mids are going for 2 firsts, it seems somewhat ridiculous that we'd trade that currency to move up to select a player that is no guarantee whatsoever to be better than the bloke we draft at 7. If we're going that route, we would have been better off going for Cerra (which I do not advocate for either).The other team doesn't answer the phone unless you've giving up a fair bit
I'd be more inclined to play the numbers game and stick with our current picks. Particularly given that fully proven AFL mids are going for 2 firsts, it seems somewhat ridiculous that we'd trade that currency to move up to select a player that is no guarantee whatsoever to be better than the bloke we draft at 7. If we're going that route, we would have been better off going for Cerra (which I do not advocate for either).
Think we have a great opportunity to get 3-5 really solid contributors that will bring our baseline of talent up and stand us in really good stead to remain competitive now and hopefully avoid a Hawks style cliff edge in a few seasons. I wouldn't want to squander that opportunity.
No its not.
Its no different if i was comparing Dusty too Kmart Dusty.