Remove this Banner Ad

Discussion 2021 Fixture Changes , including Byes

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I tend to agree on no extra trades, but I'd rather it stays best18 and just accept that I may end up playing 1 short that week than to give those who have burnt through all their allocated trades any trade relief.

I think you have to do extra trades or best 16, all keeping the status quo does is reward those who have catered towards one bye round out of sheer luck. There's no skill in one fixture being changed and that massively benefitting someone.

Best 16 > Daylight > Extra Trades though imo. Extra trades as you said gives relief to those who burnt through trades, best 16 keeps the season's scoring structure relatively normal as Richmond/WCE dont have that many high ownership players.

Dusty/Short//RCD/NicNat/Bolton are the only playing players above 5% ownership.

I'd say there would be very few people with more than 3 of those, and anyone who brings in CCJ willingly not knowing when the fixture is going to be played shouldn't be accounted for in any potential decision.

I'm not entirely sure they have the ability to change to Best 15 though, so I'd imagine extra trades are coming if the match gets moved.
 
I think you have to do extra trades or best 16, all keeping the status quo does is reward those who have catered towards one bye round out of sheer luck. There's no skill in one fixture being changed and that massively benefitting someone.

Best 16 > Daylight > Extra Trades though imo. Extra trades as you said gives relief to those who burnt through trades, best 16 keeps the season's scoring structure relatively normal as Richmond/WCE dont have that many high ownership players.

Dusty/RCD/NicNat/Bolton are the only playing players above 5% ownership.

I'd say there would be very few people with more than 3 of those, and anyone who brings in CCJ willingly not knowing when the fixture is going to be played shouldn't be accounted for in any potential decision.

I'm not entirely sure they have the ability to change to Best 15 though, so I'd imagine extra trades are coming if the match gets moved.
Short?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Nope. Followed up with this:


How is that pencilneck even employed? Any time he's put under even the slightest pressure his go to response is to get defensive, make feeble excuses, play the victim and deflect. Pathetic.
 
They would avoid all abuse if they simply published what WOULD happen if the game was moved.

It was rumoured Monday this week wasn't it? A whole working week to make a decision on how they would handle it if it happens. Doesn't lock them into doing it unless the game is actually changed.

No different to the precedent they've published at the start of this season with any fixture change = Best 18.

They could then publish that and give people ample time to plan their trades before lockout tonight.
 
They would avoid all abuse if they simply published what WOULD happen if the game was moved.

It was rumoured Monday this week wasn't it? A whole working week to make a decision on how they would handle it if it happens. Doesn't lock them into doing it unless the game is actually changed.

No different to the precedent they've published at the start of this season with any fixture change = Best 18.

They could then publish that and give people ample time to plan their trades before lockout tonight.

Whatever they decide won’t be perfect and will piss people. That said they should still give a rationale as to why the made the choice they did

i bet they won’t

dumb kents
 

Remove this Banner Ad

They would avoid all abuse if they simply published what WOULD happen if the game was moved.

It was rumoured Monday this week wasn't it? A whole working week to make a decision on how they would handle it if it happens. Doesn't lock them into doing it unless the game is actually changed.

No different to the precedent they've published at the start of this season with any fixture change = Best 18.

They could then publish that and give people ample time to plan their trades before lockout tonight.
You speak a lot of sense. Perhaps you should apply for this job?

 
Whatever they decide won’t be perfect and will piss people. That said they should still give a rationale as to why the made the choice they did

i bet they won’t

dumb kents
A decision that isn’t perfect is eased if it’s made well in advance and people know. Like right ****ing now. Before tonights game.

That was the prob with the Melb vs Ess decision. They made it at 8:30pm on Sat night after playing players were locked on the bench.

Smart move was to work all this out preseason and publish it. If this happens, we’ll do this.
 
Make round 13 & 14 a combined round?
Best 36 split into 2 best 18 scores.
the 12 teams byes are then still spread over two rounds.
 
Probabaly already been discussed, but when do bye players get locked out? At the start of the last game?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Don’t know if this has been mentioned but here’s my little suggestion.
Richmond west coast played in round 13. Players scores don’t count towards round 13 scores but those scores for that match get added in like normal for round 14 scores? Seems simple?
 
Don’t know if this has been mentioned but here’s my little suggestion.
Richmond west coast played in round 13. Players scores don’t count towards round 13 scores but those scores for that match get added in like normal for round 14 scores? Seems simple?

It would seem simple if Richmond/WCE is the last game of the round and we could have a lockout/new round start before their game, but the Monday game makes this impossible. How would this even work? You select non-playing Richmond players in R13 and they take up spots in your line-up that could theoretically go to 28 playing R13 players? How do you have a lockout and the ability to trade in R13 Richmond/WCE players?

You would have two separate states within the game, one where R14 is active and one where R13 is active, with changes being able to be made to one that doesn't affect the other. Not even Fantasy Premier League has the ability to do this and they have 100x the resources of Champion Data.

Seems fine on paper but in practice would never work.
 
If a R14 game is shifted to R13 how about R13 is best 20 players score and R14 is best 16?

Will certainly throw the cat amongst the seagulls.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom