- Sep 6, 2005
- 145,004
- 94,851
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Thread starter
- #2,426
So to summarize....there mist be a material restriction otherwise a hold cannot be called....MR means deviating the players momentum from where it was going. And....if a defensive players first move is to rip which thus causes the OLman to be in a holding situation, then it is not holding and the OLman can basically continue hooking/restricting/holding the player, he earned that right by the defenders premature use of the rip. Those two points seem to be the most salient to consider. You can hold a little, you can have arms out or in, you can grab, but soon as you restrict the defenders momentum, the angle hes going, causing it deviate, thats a hold. Also important in the article...that if a ref didnt see the whole action he cannot throw a flag. A good indicator of a hold and material restriction for officials to see is if the linemans FEET ARE BEAT. If the defender skillfully got to a position where his feet are advanced veyond where the linemans feet are, then usually a lineman will resort to holding. As he is beat and thus any attempt to thwart the rusher will cause him to be materially restricted.
This is why they constantly preach about footwork and good technique as a lineman.
The only thing im still confused by tbh is youre not allowed to take a defender down to the ground, and yet they always talk about how good lineman have pancaked a defender. Will have to find an article and video to explain that.
This is why they constantly preach about footwork and good technique as a lineman.
The only thing im still confused by tbh is youre not allowed to take a defender down to the ground, and yet they always talk about how good lineman have pancaked a defender. Will have to find an article and video to explain that.